csura999
Active Member
What do you guys think of the candidates?
Vote- Best Zoo Nominees: 2017 10Best Readers' Choice Travel Awards
Vote- Best Zoo Nominees: 2017 10Best Readers' Choice Travel Awards
Im surprised by riverbanks and Cleveland and Cheyenne mountain zoo also surprised that la and of course toledo did not make it have been to Brookfield many times as i used to live in Chicago always changing was not impressed by alot of st Louis zoo reptile house was amazing and because of only a little snow rivers edge and 1904 bird cage were closed mediocre hoofstock exhibits with a variety of species and ancient indoor antelope house that looks like a prison insectarium was not bad and i did not visit children's zoo or apes aviary good but repetitive penguins and puffins good and monkeys good but also repetitive the bad part of the aviary is the raptor exhibits inside are just bars and a bare exhibit like the antelope house.What do you guys think of the candidates?
Vote- Best Zoo Nominees: 2017 10Best Readers' Choice Travel Awards
Why shouldn't Cincinnati or Audubon be on theirI voted for Bronx although I love Columbus and San Diego and Bronx might be passed by Saint Louis and/or Omaha for me when I visit in May. IMO of the ones I've visited it is ridiculous Miami, Dallas, Detroit and North Carolina aren't on there while Riverbanks, Audubon, Cleveland, Cincinnati and Memphis should definitely not be on there. Of the ones I haven't seen I think Sedgwick County, Minnesota, Oklahoma City and Kansas City should definitely be on there. Still it is much better than many other similar lists (I've seen Zoo America and Lion Country Safari ranked before).
Cincinnati has a stellar collection but mostly average/subpar exhibits. Audubon's exhibits are mostly average.Why shouldn't Cincinnati or Audubon be on theit5
Toledo zoo should be on there they have amazing exhibits Cleveland and riverbanks noCincinnati has a stellar collection but mostly average/subpar exhibits. Audubon's exhibits are mostly average.
They should have used you as an expert instead since I have utmost confidence you would have not put Reid Park on the list despite your connections with the zoo.Well now I know how Cleveland got on the list (which I think almost every ZooChatter would agree does not belong). If you read the bios of the five experts they used, one worked at Cleveland Zoo for 35 years! No bias there?![]()
It's really ridiculous! My list would go something like this:How is Riverbanks and Fort Worth beating out Brookfield? It's clearly superior in both collection and quality. And where in the world is Minnesota and North Carolina! Don't even get me started on Woodland park being in last place!
The only way anyone can truly qualify to vote in a poll like this is if you've visited them all. I've only visited three of the shortlist. I know which is my favourite of those three, but that's pretty meaningless.
This is just a test of how many click-throughs a zoo can generate.