Last time I was there I didn't see any of the Capybara, but otherwise I'm pretty sure I've always seen all four.
Wellington Zoo has imported two young Dingos from Australia, a five-month-old female named Kiah and a seven-month-old male named Blue.
No, sorry. The last two times the zoo imported Dingos (in 2010 and 2012) they phrased it in press releases as simply "from New South Wales", so presumably from a private breeder or something along those lines. The first pair (in 2008) came from the Australian Dingo Foundation in Victoria.Do you know where they were imported from?
That’s a shame.Male Sun Bear, Sean has died. He was 22 years old
Wellington Zoo sun bear Sean dies after health problems
That’s a shame.
This leaves New Zealand with one female sun bear (his daughter).
It was my understanding the the zoos within Australasia phased out brown bears to be replaced with the Sun bear species, so does it now appear even these could also find their way out of collections in the near future!I was hopeful that Wellington Zoo would import a male to breed with Sasa when Sean died, but I don't believe Wellington Zoo has a sun bear maternity den (almost essential for successful breeding) so perhaps breeding is not on the cards. It's a shame because Perth Zoo have been advised not to breed because of a lack of space, so their male could have been imported. Many zoos seem to be phasing them out (Adelaide etc.) which is dissapointing. Wellington Zoo have a relatively long and successful history with this species, rearing two of the four sun bears born in Australasia to survive to adulthood (Arataki in 1999 and Sasa in 2006).
If they can't use her, then hopefully they will offer her to the EEP. The European programme has really struggled over the last few years with a lack of births, few collections wanting to go into them and individuals who aren't capable of breeding (rescued ex-pets) etc. But breeding has now resumed (births in two separate collections this year), a new studbook holder is in place and things are looking up. A relatively young, captive bred female with no known issues would be of great assistance if an export could be arranged from New Zealand
And a non plan in place ..., a real shame they have been put on phase out.Am I correct in saying that there are eight sun bears in the Australasian region?
Perth Zoo- 1:1
National Zoo and Aquarium- 1:1
Taronga Zoo- 1:1
Wildlife HQ- 0:1
Wellington Zoo- 0:1
Eight individuals seems like such a small population for our main bear species.![]()
Am I correct in saying that there are eight sun bears in the Australasian region?
Perth Zoo- 1:1
National Zoo and Aquarium- 1:1
Taronga Zoo- 1:1
Wildlife HQ- 0:1
Wellington Zoo- 0:1
Eight individuals seems like such a small population for our main bear species.![]()
I am all for conservation breeding program and do understand the all the constraints of good husbandry / housing practice and on space, but when it becomes so contrived that breeding recommendations to maintain and develop the population sustainably are not given and/or withheld and the net end result is a bad sex age / ratio pyramid and no long term future perspective ensues and ... then the - and the inevitable final mastered conclusion ... is a phase-out proposal it is a Catch22 self fullfilling prophecy, I cannot help but get the feeling of a a lack of a greater vision for ex situ conservation.That's correct. One of the males (Mr Hobbs at Taronga) has never bred with the females; but the two males at the National Zoo and the Perth Zoo are both part of proven breeding pairs (and indeed each produced one of the last two births in the region in 2008).
It's a shame Perth Zoo haven't been given permission to breed again. A male cub from this pair would be so valuable to the region as Jamran and Bopha are both wild born and their only relative is their daughter, Maly (2008). A male cub could have been paired with Sasa (2006) or Mary (2008) to create a new breeding pair instead of these two females potentially going to waste. Given bears are generally considered post reproductive by their late teens, I'd almost say it'd be too late to breed a mate for Sasa (aged 12) given that males of this species aren't generally successful at breeding until at least 5-6 years of age (usually older).
I am all for conservation breeding program and do understand the all the constraints of good husbandry / housing practice and on space, but when it becomes so contrived that breeding recommendations to maintain and develop the population sustainably are not given and/or withheld and the net end result is a bad sex age / ratio pyramid and no long term future perspective ensues and ... then the - and the inevitable final mastered conclusion ... is a phase-out proposal it is a Catch22 self fullfilling prophecy, I cannot help but get the feeling of a a lack of a greater vision for ex situ conservation.
With sun bears in Australia as well as North America at least it is a dying - literally - and a crying shame. Alas, in all this Europe remains not too ... far behind in this when it comes to sex age / ratio pyramids and the perspective of its total population and future outlook. Allthough, lately ... a new and thankfully more ambitious studbook holder and species manager seems to have woken up to a (possible and future) reality (to avert).
The ZAA (Australasian version) are particularly prone to this idea that they must maintain a sustainable population within the confines of the limited number of spaces within Australian and NZ zoos. Unless they are small species that can be easily maintained in large groups in captivity, or half-captive managed by regular releases into the 'wild', it will never work. How many individuals would ZAA zoos need to keep to maintain sun bears sustainably? And that is for one bear species which are actually popular with the paying visitors. Madness and doomed to failure. Australasian zoos should be able to manage keeping more than a handful of sun bears (alongside a couple of polars and pandas).I am all for conservation breeding program and do understand the all the constraints of good husbandry / housing practice and on space, but when it becomes so contrived that breeding recommendations to maintain and develop the population sustainably are not given and/or withheld and the net end result is a bad sex age / ratio pyramid and no long term future perspective ensues and ... then the - and the inevitable final mastered conclusion ... is a phase-out proposal it is a Catch22 self fullfilling prophecy, I cannot help but get the feeling of a a lack of a greater vision for ex situ conservation.
With sun bears in Australia as well as North America at least it is a dying - literally - and a crying shame. Alas, in all this Europe remains not too ... far behind in this when it comes to sex age / ratio pyramids and the perspective of its total population and future outlook. Allthough, lately ... a new and thankfully more ambitious studbook holder and species manager seems to have woken up to a (possible and future) reality (to avert).
The ZAA (Australasian version) are particularly prone to this idea that they must maintain a sustainable population within the confines of the limited number of spaces within Australian and NZ zoos. Unless they are small species that can be easily maintained in large groups in captivity, or half-captive managed by regular releases into the 'wild', it will never work. How many individuals would ZAA zoos need to keep to maintain sun bears sustainably? And that is for one bear species which are actually popular with the paying visitors. Madness and doomed to failure. Australasian zoos should be able to manage keeping more than a handful of sun bears (alongside a couple of polars and pandas).
Don't get me wrong I agree that it is important that we maintain self-sustaining captive populations, not reliant on regular 'topping up' from wild sources. But I feel that this is only logical on a global stage, particularly for the very large species.