





I absolutely love the more realistic designs!An update we have new renders for the dinosaurs and the official logo
View attachment 506794View attachment 506798View attachment 506796View attachment 506795
These are three of the Atrociraptors appearing and they have names, Tiger, Ghost, Panther, and Red.View attachment 506799
This shoe shows Rexy with her design similar to the one in the original Jurassic park, Blue next to one of the Atrociraptors, the best part they have non-pronated arms(blue is semi-pronated in between), and the best design, a Parasaurolophus different from the ones in the Jurassic park/world movies and it’s much more accurate proper skull shape, thicker neck, bulky tail, and the front toes almost hoof like(not unlike the Edmontosaurus hoof perhaps this was before the discovery when they went into production), and possibly Quadrapedal most of the time and bipedal when standing and running.
View attachment 506797
This is the designs for the allosaurus based on battle of big rock and the broken horn Carnotaurus from fallen kingdom.
These came from Twitter by the way.
As usual, it makes no sense. Species of completely different time periods and locations thrown together. The outdated "egg-eating oviraptor" trope that even my four-year-old objected to while watching. The usual "T.Rex gets beaten up by the new big baddie dinosaur" spiel. Since when did Giganotosaurus have such huge Proc. spinosi?The prologue short.
Yeah I was kind of disappointed with the scene; it also continued the trope of the world being a rainforest during the Mesozoic. The scene seemed to take place at the modern-day Hell Creek Formation. Nasutoceratops was portrayed as living alongside the other Hell Creek Paleobiota despite only having fossils discovered in the Kaiparowits Formation in Utah. The Giganotosaurus also lived in Argentina. Both species also lived long before the Cretaceous-Paleogene Mass Extinction event so the “65 Million Year's Later” doesnt quite work. I thought the modern day part was fine. I just hope that the film is better than the “prehistoric” scene.As usual, it makes no sense. Species of completely different time periods and locations thrown together. The outdated "egg-eating oviraptor" trope that even my four-year-old objected to while watching. The usual "T.Rex gets beaten up by the new big baddie dinosaur" spiel. Since when did Giganotosaurus have such huge Proc. spinosi?
The modern day part is just as foolish and pointless.
Regarding the CGI: nihil novi.
I read both novels; ever since I've felt the movies should use more inspiration from the novels and this would be PERFECT.While not realistic I would love if the carnotaurus were able to change their colors and camouflage like they did in the second novel.
Due to this scene taking place in the Hell Creek Formation; it would likely be an Anzu, not an Oviraptor.Aside from the inaccuracies of time and geography
Oviraptor was an omnivore, so it is a bit plausible and modern-day birds like jays and crows raid bird's nests today
What are your opinions on the dinosaur designs like non-pronated dinosaurs and feathered?
I like the feathered dinosaurs if properly done just like how Jurassic pulled it off on the oviraptor, Moros, and the flashback T. Rex is well done with a combination of scaly and proto-feather fuzzy.