zooboy28
Well-Known Member
We can easily define some types of specialist collections, such as aquaria, falconry centres, bird gardens, but it gets tougher when we try and differentiate between zoos and wildlife parks. Wildlife parks are a specific genre of zoos, but whether they can be regarded as more respectable I am not so sure. In the 1970's there was a proliferation of wildlife parks and many were run on a shoe string, were poorly run and failed to thrive. The same can be said about many small zoos. There are some wonderful wildlife parks and zoos, and it is the larger zoological institutions, with their research and conservation programmes that are the more prestigious.
These are just my views, it would be good to hear how others feel.
At least in Australasia, zoos are generally urban animal attractions, while wildlife parks are more typically rural, and often smaller, with a greater focus on domestic and/or native species, with fewer exotics. But there are many exceptions, so I don't think here there is any reason you would expect a "zoo" to differ from a "wildlife park" or even a "sanctuary". The definitions are essentially identical, and quite different to how you describe the UK situation.