What is your favourite subspecies/race of a particular animal?

Tapirus Lar

Well-Known Member
What is your favorite subspecies/race/variant of a particular animal? It can be your favorite for any reason. Only one rule, it has to be naturally occurring, not a man-made variant/ a variant selectively bred by man, and shouldn't be domestic. So no 'my favorite canis lupus familiaris is a Rottweiler' or something like that
 
What is your favorite subspecies/race/variant of a particular animal? It can be your favorite for any reason. Only one rule, it has to be naturally occurring, not a man-made variant/ a variant selectively bred by man, and shouldn't be domestic. So no 'my favorite canis lupus familiaris is a Rottweiler' or something like that

I love Quaggas and mourn the fact that they were driven to extinction by man.

At least we have Rau "quaggas" nowadays. They aren't the real thing, obviously, but they’re an interesting recreation.
Quagga Project - Wikipedia
 
I love the Espanola Marine Iguana(Amblyrhynchus cristatus venustissimus) above the other Marine Iguana subspecies due to the much brighter pink and blue coloration

another would be the Thai Mountain Bamboo Racer(Oreocryptophis porphyraceus coxi) as I prefer the two black stripes down the back over the bands
 
Hmm let me think.
There are so many to cover but I guess I'll start with my favorite animal in general. The Sumatran Tiger is likely my top choice among tiger subspecies. They just seem so much more "Wild" than their mainland counterparts. Their mane is more noticeable, and their darker colors give them a fierce look that I find really cool. It is such a shame that they are the only remaining island subspecies.
 
For some context, listed below is what I consider to be an up-to-date classification of the living (and extinct) subspecies and “populations” (aka, previously valid subspecies) of tiger; and while this classification has been contested by some. This list should hopefully clear some confusion into what us ZooChatters consider to be their favorite tiger subspecies:

1. Mainland Tigers / Panthera tigris tigris
  • P. t. tigris - Bengal
  • P. t. tigris (altaica) - Siberian / Amur
  • P. t. tigris (jacksoni) - Malayan
  • P. t. tigris (virgata) - Caspian - {extinct}
  • P. t. tigris (corbetii) - Indochinese
  • P. t. tigris (amoyensis) - South Chinese

2. Sunda Tigers / Panthera tigris sondaica

  • P. t. sondaica (sumatrae) - Sumatran
  • P. t. sondaica - Javan - {extinct}
  • P. t. sondaica (balica) - Balinese - {extinct}

As for what some ZooChatters call “generic” tigers (which I personally find to be a slightly negative connotation). I propose that we should just call them tigers, regardless of their genetic background; and that they should be labeled as just Panthera tigris.

Now what does this all have to do with my favorite subspecies of tiger? As this point, I should probably tell you that in short, it’s going to be a tie between the Malayan population of the Mainland Tiger and the Sumatran population of the Sunda Tiger. Why? well, it all comes down to what I personally consider as my all time favorite; and frankly, I’ve come to enjoy them equally. Especially, after seeing both populations across numerous facilities here in the states (including my local zoo, which used to have both).
 
As for what some ZooChatters call “generic” tigers (which I personally find to be a slightly negative connotation). I propose that we should just call them tigers, regardless of their genetic background; and that they should be labeled as just Panthera tigris.
"Generic Tiger" is still a helpful term to specify that the animals are not a specific subspecies. If I just say a zoo has "Tigers", that could mean Sumatran, or Amur, or Malayan, or any other specific subspecies. But if I say they have "Generic Tigers", you know exactly what I'm talking about.
 
Sure, people can have their own take on what a “generic” tiger should be called; and of course, that’s fine by me. It’s just that if I’m going to post future media or perhaps, find myself in a zoo or sanctuary with “generic” tigers. From here on out, I’m going to use the term “non-specific” for those animals.
 
For some context, listed below is what I consider to be an up-to-date classification of the living (and extinct) subspecies and “populations” (aka, previously valid subspecies) of tiger; and while this classification has been contested by some. This list should hopefully clear some confusion into what us ZooChatters consider to be their favorite tiger subspecies:

1. Mainland Tigers / Panthera tigris tigris
  • P. t. tigris - Bengal
  • P. t. tigris (altaica) - Siberian / Amur
  • P. t. tigris (jacksoni) - Malayan
  • P. t. tigris (virgata) - Caspian - {extinct}
  • P. t. tigris (corbetii) - Indochinese
  • P. t. tigris (amoyensis) - South Chinese

2. Sunda Tigers / Panthera tigris sondaica

  • P. t. sondaica (sumatrae) - Sumatran
  • P. t. sondaica - Javan - {extinct}
  • P. t. sondaica (balica) - Balinese - {extinct}

As for what some ZooChatters call “generic” tigers (which I personally find to be a slightly negative connotation). I propose that we should just call them tigers, regardless of their genetic background; and that they should be labeled as just Panthera tigris.

Now what does this all have to do with my favorite subspecies of tiger? As this point, I should probably tell you that in short, it’s going to be a tie between the Malayan population of the Mainland Tiger and the Sumatran population of the Sunda Tiger. Why? well, it all comes down to what I personally consider as my all time favorite; and frankly, I’ve come to enjoy them equally. Especially, after seeing both populations across numerous facilities here in the states (including my local zoo, which used to have both).
I for one will never accept the horrid 2 subspecies lumper model. I am thankful that accredited zoos are still following the 9 subspecies model. How anyone can think and Amur and a Malayan are the same subspecies is beyond me.

also wasn't a living Javan Tiger found and confirmed via DNA testing? so they are technically not actually extinct anymore
 
also wasn't a living Javan Tiger found and confirmed via DNA testing? so they are technically not actually extinct anymore

No; I suspect you are thinking of the Taiwanese subspecies of Indochinese Clouded Leopard.

It's worth noting incidentally that even if one doesn't accept the heavily lumped tiger taxonomy, the evidence for Siberian and Caspian being merged is very solid - they were a single widespread population until the 19th century.
 
@King of Komodo Dragons I should’ve addressed that I never expected my post on tiger taxonomy to be agreed upon by everyone to begin with. So if anyone like you (and the AZA apparently) would like to claim about how many tiger subspecies there are. That’s fine by me, since I too wasn’t a big fan of the two tiger subspecies idea for the longest time.
 
Last edited:
No; I suspect you are thinking of the Taiwanese subspecies of Indochinese Clouded Leopard.
He's almost right, anecdotally at least. Javan tiger hair was believed to have been found and supposedly confirmed via genetic testing earlier this year, but the claims were heavily criticised by just about everyone else and it would be generous to refer to them as dubious.
 
Hello. My favourite subspecies is the giant sable antelope (Hippotragus niger variani). But I also really like the following:

- Blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi);
- Bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus pygargus);
- Fringe-eared oryx (Oryx beisa callotis);
- Southern sable antelope (Hippotragus niger niger);
- White-eared kob (Kobus kob leucotis).

As you can see, I love antelope.
 
Back
Top