ANyhuis
Well-Known Member
Having pandas and koalas is cool, but I would not say they are some of the best exhibits. The only really good koala exhibit I have seen is at Albuquerque and the only good giant panda exhibit at National D.C. It is amazing that an animal as popular and expensive and crowd-drawing as giant pandas are given poor exhibits from the visitor's standpoint. I know they have extensive off-exhibit areas, but the public space at both San Diego and Memphis is below average (I haven't been to Atlanta).
No offense, but I disagree. What, I wonder, makes you call these exhibits "poor ... from a visitor's standpoint"? While San Diego's panda and koala exhibits are not architecturally wonderful, they do offer an unparalleled experience for visitors. That "experience" includes panda cubs (usually) and their vast number of koalas. They aren't perfect exhibits, but they're far from "poor".
I also don't know what makes you say the public space for the panda exhibit in Memphis is "below average". I've heard some complaints (perhaps justified) about the space the Memphis pandas live in, the "public space" (the amazing CHINA exhibit) is wonderful! It's full of authentic Chinese architecture and atmosphere. I ranked it as a Top 10 exhibit in the nation! Did you really mean to say the "public space" in Memphis is bad?