The male sea lion went to Artis(Amsterdam, the Netherlands).
I remember the original pair of Giant Otters at the Chestnut Centre being very lively and vocal , perhaps Otter feeding time can repace the very popular Sea Lion feeding .
I saw Giant Otters many years ago at Duisburg Zoo they are indeed very engaging.
John, thank you for the insights, invaluable as always.However, one experienced marine mammal vet did comment to me that they may be better having access to both environments. When I was a Woburn the main pool was fresh water but the sea lion off show holding pool had salt added.
Whey hey!I am sure Chester will be taking all this into account and I wish them well with them- I just wish they weren't replacing the Sea Lions (note spelling)
I remember the original pair of Giant Otters at the Chestnut Centre being very lively and vocal , perhaps Otter feeding time can repace the very popular Sea Lion feeding .
I saw them at Duisburg in the 80's. Feeding time meant half a dozen live trout were dropped into the pool, which was a crystal clear concrete affair. Seeing the otters catch the fish within seconds was quite a sight, although I'm not sure if live feeding would be permitted today.
- the otters may well have too much water and not enough land. Perhaps a solution would be to in-fill one half of the pool (the one nearest the aquarium) and create a stream from there to the open water.
That's exactly what I was getting at-a big water area but only narrow margins of land. Several otter species (e.g. Asian small-clawed) are as terrestrial as they are aquatic and I think Giants fall into that category too. As Alan mentioned, I think some 'set dressing' with tree roots/ tropical plants etc will certainly be necessary and yes, at the end of the day a totally new exhibit might well have achieved things better- and without the Sea Lions having to leave. But its still an interesting development.
This, of course, assumes the sea lions weren't leaving anyway!
My point is, the Sea Lions didn't need to leave... If Chester chose to get rid of them that's a different matter but why should they want to, except becuse they wanted to replace them with something else. I do think the Zoo will be poorer for their loss. Up the road at Blackpool they are upgrading their Sea Lion pool and I think it will be an excellent exhibit for the public.
Up the road at Blackpool they are upgrading their Sea Lion pool and I think it will be an excellent exhibit for the public.
I can understand wanting giant otters (great addition) but surely, if the sea lion pool requires the amount of work we think it might, then the zoo would have been a better place with a purpose built exhibit for the otters, and the retention of the sea lions.My point is, the Sea Lions didn't need to leave... If Chester chose to get rid of them that's a different matter but why should they want to, except becuse they wanted to replace them with something else.
If the decision was made to dispense with the sea lions before the advent of the otters, then I'd be interested to know the reasoning why, given that they're a hugely popular species. "Feeding time at the giant otters" doesn't have the same ring, and nor will they make the same noise.
I understand your point completely, but I don't think I'd be comfortable labelling the enclosure as unsuitable. Certainly it could be bigger and better, but the same could be said for many of them.Surely you can see the point of view the enclosure is not really suited to Sea lions?