Where to visit in Boston?

Hello. It is has been a long time since I posted on Zoo Chat. I miss posting here. I was busy with life, but now I have returned to seek advice on this upcoming trip to Boston, MA. I am planning to visit the New England Aquarium, but which of the zoos should I visit? Thanks in advance.
 
It would be easier to give you advice if you can provide more details on your trip. How many days will you be in Boston? How many zoos do you have time for? Do you have a car?
 
Hello. It is has been a long time since I posted on Zoo Chat. I miss posting here. I was busy with life, but now I have returned to seek advice on this upcoming trip to Boston, MA. I am planning to visit the New England Aquarium, but which of the zoos should I visit? Thanks in advance.
Franklin Park is an amazing zoo; you should probably go there one day.
 
If you are limiting yourself to Boston, then the Franklin Park Zoo is the other main zoo (after the aquarium) in the city to see wildlife. It isn't as strong a zoo as you would expect for such a major city, but the giraffe exhibit, gorilla complex, and bird collection are all pretty strong. There is also a tropic house with some smaller primates, pygmy hippos, bairds tapirs, and other animals. The zoo has rare species like Potto, Kiwi, and Kea, and it takes around 2-3 hours to see everything.

Half an hour outside of Boston, you have the Stone Zoo, which is smaller than Franklin Park but many people also consider it to be higher quality. The best exhibits there are for snow leopards and markhor (they live on an actual natural cliffside!), for gray wolves (who have a great forested enclosure), and there is also a nice central America themed desert complex with jaguars and chacoan peccaries that leads into a great carribean zone with a flamingo aviary and exhibits for jamaican iguanas and bush dogs. The dogs and iguanas are also rare species.

If you are willing to drive an hour, another great but small MA zoo is located in New Bedford. The Buttonwood Park Zoo is in a beautiful well planted location with a natural stream that runs through the park. They have a strong native species section with a great bison exhibit, where the bovids share space with White-Tailed Deer and various waterfowl (including many rare water birds). The zoo also has a great tropics building with rare new world primates like night monkeys, and the primates live in mixed-species enclosures with additional birds, reptiles, and fish who swim in water features below. This zoo also has Asian Elephants, which are engaging to watch.

The last major zoo in Massachusetts is Southwick's Zoo, which some people call the best in New England. It has one of the best mammal collections in the area, especially when it comes to hoofstock and primates. It is not my personal favorite because it has a bad layout, is more commercial, and has lower exhibit quality (and its also not AZA, if that matters to you). But since some people think really highly of it, it would be worth considering.

If you are willing to leave Massachusetts, there are also even higher quality options in neighboring states. Roger Williams Park Zoo in Providence is very popular and it was included in the book "America's Top 100 Zoos & Aquariums". Squam Lake Science Center in NH and Maine Wildlife Park in ME are also great destinations, but those are even more out of the way so it might not be worth making the long drive.
 
For me the aquarium was quite the let down. However I do recommend Franklin Park. I didn’t visit the Stone Zoo. I’m not an expert in this region however. Hope I could help.:)
 

When I went I felt like it was lacking a big exhibit or a “star” animal and I felt it hard to justify the ticket price. The trip was also quite forgettable as well.
I, for one, can certainly understand the sentiment that NEAQ is a let-down, and personally I rank it near the middle of facilities I've visited. @Spike is right that they don't have all of the same "star power" many other aquariums have, for better or for worse. They lack large sharks (except for the new nurse shark!), there are only two species of penguin and they lack underwater viewing, and the only mammals are two common pinniped species housed in exhibits that leave a lot to be desired, one of which located out of the way in the back of the aquarium.

The big issue I have with NEAQ, however, is that it has some of the worst crowd flow and layout of any facility I've visited, and the fact it is always crowded makes it nowhere near as pleasant of an experience as it otherwise would be. While I have nothing but respect for the institution of NEAQ and they do a lot of great work trying to breed aquarium fish behind-the-scenes, I'd personally choose to visit a more enjoyable facility, such as Mystic or one of the zoos, any day of the week.
 
I, for one, can certainly understand the sentiment that NEAQ is a let-down, and personally I rank it near the middle of facilities I've visited. @Spike is right that they don't have all of the same "star power" many other aquariums have, for better or for worse. They lack large sharks (except for the new nurse shark!), there are only two species of penguin and they lack underwater viewing, and the only mammals are two common pinniped species housed in exhibits that leave a lot to be desired, one of which located out of the way in the back of the aquarium.

The big issue I have with NEAQ, however, is that it has some of the worst crowd flow and layout of any facility I've visited, and the fact it is always crowded makes it nowhere near as pleasant of an experience as it otherwise would be. While I have nothing but respect for the institution of NEAQ and they do a lot of great work trying to breed aquarium fish behind-the-scenes, I'd personally choose to visit a more enjoyable facility, such as Mystic or one of the zoos, any day of the week.

My main problem is the crowd flow, as well. I don't think anywhere needs a star to be good, and the amount of shark species they have, especially the rare ones, make up for no large species; I'd much rather see several small, rare sharks than another sand tiger. I liked the sea lion exhibit, and it's way better than the awful harbor seal one out front that I'd forgotten about. In comparison to Mystic, I think it depends what you're looking for. If it's fish or birds, New England is definitely better (unless it's paddlefish ;))
 
My main problem is the crowd flow, as well. I don't think anywhere needs a star to be good, and the amount of shark species they have, especially the rare ones, make up for no large species; I'd much rather see several small, rare sharks than another sand tiger. I liked the sea lion exhibit, and it's way better than the awful harbor seal one out front that I'd forgotten about. In comparison to Mystic, I think it depends what you're looking for. If it's fish or birds, New England is definitely better (unless it's paddlefish ;))
I agree that a star isn't needed to be good, however I do understand @Spike's criticism that it doesn't have any of the typical star species, meaning if someone goes to the aquarium expecting to see these species, then they may be disappointed. I know that I didn't realize they no longer had any large sharks at my most recent visit, which meant it was a little disappointing to not see any. I didn't realize any of their smaller sharks were rare, but I'm also not a big fish person. They certainly have more birds at NEAQ than at Mystic (although even NEAQ only has around five species or so), however I for one still miss the little blue penguins they once had.
 
I agree that a star isn't needed to be good, however I do understand @Spike's criticism that it doesn't have any of the typical star species, meaning if someone goes to the aquarium expecting to see these species, then they may be disappointed. I know that I didn't realize they no longer had any large sharks at my most recent visit, which meant it was a little disappointing to not see any. I didn't realize any of their smaller sharks were rare, but I'm also not a big fish person. They certainly have more birds at NEAQ than at Mystic (although even NEAQ only has around five species or so), however I for one still miss the little blue penguins they once had.

A couple of the downstairs sharks, they might be the only holder of? Certainly the only holder in the northeast, at least. The shorebird exhibit's species are all rare, as well.
 
They lack large sharks (except for the new nurse shark!), there are only two species of penguin and they lack underwater viewing, and the only mammals are two common pinniped species housed in exhibits that leave a lot to be desired, one of which located out of the way in the back of the aquarium.
I feel some of this criticism is completely unwarranted. For instance, if you are going to take into account the recent departure of their northern fur seal, then I think it would be prudent to properly recognize that they do now have a large shark, which isn't an exception. The sea lions really aren't "out of the way." Several aquariums I expect you would rate higher if you visited have even fewer or the same amount of penguin species. I believe the Shedd Aquarium, the Monterey Bay Aquarium, the Georgia Aquarium, and the Mystic Aquarium all have only one or two species. That said, the lack of window viewing is a little disappointing.

You are completely right about crowd flow, which is appallingly terrible.


A couple of the downstairs sharks, they might be the only holder of? Certainly the only holder in the northeast, at least. The shorebird exhibit's species are all rare, as well.
I didn't recognize anything that sounded out of the ordinary, but I'll have to check next time I visit.
 
Even though NEAQ doesn't really have any of the common star species, I think some of their exhibits do stand out. The Giant Ocean Tank is 4 stories tall and is a unique monumental centerpiece for the entire aquarium, and the penguin exhibits are also large with big groups of the birds (even though they don't have underwater viewing).

The ray touch tank is also one of my favorites that I've seen; it is pretty naturalistic with mangrove theming, and is a good size with deep water in the back to give the sharks and rays privacy if they want to avoid all the human hands.


I'd say one of the weakest parts of NEAQ (in addition to congestion) is the marine mammals. The seal exhibit out front is small, and the sea lion exhibit out back is disappointingly unnaturalistic for such a recent addition. The aquarium used to have Northern Fur Seals until very recently which were a big attraction for enthusiasts, and they also had Sea Otters probably 15+ years ago back before the New Balance Marine Mammal Center was ever constructed.

 
I didn't recognize anything that sounded out of the ordinary, but I'll have to check next time I visit.

Coral catsharks and cloudy catsharks are unusual, and I definitely haven't seen Halmahera walking shark anywhere else. Pyjama shark is uncommon, and California horn shark is uncommon on this coast. Not sure if they actually have zebra bullhead shark as I didn't see one, but I've never seen one anywhere else, either.
 
Coral catsharks and cloudy catsharks are unusual, and I definitely haven't seen Halmahera walking shark anywhere else. Pyjama shark is uncommon, and California horn shark is uncommon on this coast. Not sure if they actually have zebra bullhead shark as I didn't see one, but I've never seen one anywhere else, either.
When did you visit, again? I bought a membership on my first of two visits so far this year (in February, I believe), after having not gone in several years. I didn't go downstairs the second time but none of these species are listed in the comprehensive album of photographs I took of the signage at that exhibit. They have an expansive breeding program for small sharks so I suppose it's possible they were just off-exhibit at the time, but they also could be gone.
 
Back
Top