Is one of these two photos what you saw? You can clearly see the sparse areas of undercoat are normal colored: Save The Tiger Fund | Black Tigers
I don't think white tigers themselves are bad per se, but rather the breeding of them. When animals are just bred for colours, bad things happenThere's horses with nerve issues, pit bulls bred for the "rare" blue colouration are more prone to skin problems, cats who are deaf and as we see with the white tigers too often, deformities.
They even said in the voice-over that tigers were declining in the wild. So why is this zoo going to concentrate on breeding Whites?
It didn't explain why they are concentrating on White, in preference to Normal- coloured Tigers, or the message was lost to me... But there is one important difference here, being in India these will at least be pure Indian tigers, whereas all those outside India are of mixed race nowadays and the pure Indian tigers(of either colour) have been lost.
Just a question does anyone know if any zoos breed only pure bred bengal tigers? I have never seen just oranges exhibited. If a zoo has bengals they usually have a white.
What is disconcerting here is that some Indian zoos are more content to breed white tigers indiscriminately under the pretense that they are endangered in the wild than these very same zoos are for provisioning adequate housing and breeding spaces to their normally coloured and pure-bred counterparts.
There is sufficient potential for a full scale and coordinated breeding programme, but as yet nothing.. not even breeding spaces or allocation of space in general to pure-bred Bengal tigers is even adequate!
Bengal=Indian and I don't think any zoos outside India currently have any purebred Indian Tigers.
being in India these will at least be pure Indian tigers, whereas all those outside India are of mixed race nowadays and the pure Indian tigers(of either colour) have been lost.