Dicerorhinus
Well-Known Member
I guess there are some species that are much better viewed in a zoo than in the wild, and others which viewing in the wild is superior.
As an example, Orang Utans are extremely difficult to get a good view of in the wild, so zoo watching is superior, whereas a Kiwi in a nocturnal house is always just going to be a dark blur, while one strutting around a beach on Stewart Island provides an excellent view (and gives a huge thrill).
I guess I'm lazy and impatient, but I would prefer to visit a zoo holding species X than spend ages trying to find it in the wild.
I'm sure it's down to the individual but for me they are in two different leagues. Sure you may get better views in a zoo but how often does a zoo animal actually resemble or behave like it's wild counter part?
It's not even true to say you would always get a closer view at a zoo. I've been on a small motorboat within touching distance of a swimming polar. I could smell it's breath a zoo visitor would never get that experience.
It's a challenge with the potential to be very disappointed but I think the rewards are far greater. Would you rather see a group of India rhinoceros wading in thickly vegetated pool framed against the backdrop of the himalayas from a kayak or the back of an elephant or a pair standing in a quagmire at Chester zoo? In my opinion there's no contest.