Wild animals that could adapt to the captive environment

I created this topic to discuss this subject with you: Which species of animals that have never been seen in captivity could adapt to this type of environment (and maybe reproduce)? I want to see your answers for that question.
 
I created this topic to discuss this subject with you: Which species of animals that have never been seen in captivity could adapt to this type of environment (and maybe reproduce)? I want to see your answers for that question.

Anything probably could (with a few exceptions), it's partly a matter of finding the right conditions, diet, social groupings, individuals etc. It's also a matter of thinking not just can we but should we.
 
I would agree. The challenge is that, for many species being brought into captivity for the first time, there can be high mortality in those early days. Part of it will be due to the likely compromised health of animals brought in from the wild, to say nothing of potential injuries and stress from their transport. Part of it will be due to insufficient knowledge of their husbandry requirements to provide optimal care and promote reproduction. Those hurdles have been overcome with many other species in the past - gorillas used to be considered impossible to keep alive, now they are abundant in zoos. The issue is that ethics and societal perceptions have changed, and losing large numbers of animals while we tinker around with the parameters of their care would no longer be considered acceptable by many people, unless the conservation status of that species in the wild leaves us with no other choice.

You'd mentioned Ethiopian wolves in a different thread. I have no doubt that, if a sufficiently large number of Ethiopian wolves had been exported to Europe and North America one hundred years ago, we'd have them with us in zoos today.
 
I wonder if the monito del monte and shrew opossums could be kept in zoos. I would also like to see a marsupial mole, but I suspect this would be a poor exhibit and wouldn't live young.
 
Along with what others have stated, practicality is an issue. A species might be too expensive or require too much maintenance and monitoring for anyone to want to keep.
 
There are various species kept in laboratories and universities that seem to be rarely kept in zoos.
 
I think the ideal thing would be to have a semi-captive area in the range country of your intended species. Then, acclimate the individuals.

I know it's a lot more complicated than that but that's the gist. Tho I imagine some animals like the indri will just be impossible
 
You're probably right, tigris115. I saw an indri enclosure in the Andasibe Reserve, renowned for its wild indris. It had kept some indris taken from the wild, but they didn't survive long. A few indris were kept at a lemur zoo in Madagascar several years ago, but they didn't survive long either.
 
A lot of animals that are not currently adapted to a captive environment are either animals that stress incredibly easily or animals with extremely specialized diets. Progress n either of those areas could, in theory, making keeping those animals easier, but given the current trend/direction of zoos, don't expect those advances to lead to new species. Some animals with a very specialized diets that are understood enough to keep in captivity still do not flourish.
 
Back
Top