One observation from those photos is that the new bear exhibit is not at all naturalistic. Before I get shot down - I fully appreciate the need for mental stimulation for captive carnivores and that bears are particularly prone to stereotypical behaviour. I certainly don't have a problem with the the enrichment provided for the bears - they look adequately suitable.
However... WW's main appeal is that it is a small zoo situated amongst established woodland. You come across exhibits while walking along woodland paths. In fact if the exhibits were not in woodland (say farm paddocks) WW would look downright terrible as most of the fencing is basic wooden posts and mesh. It is the mature trees which make the world of difference. But that bear exhibit could be in any smaller zoo that wasn't fussed with making it look natural. It stands out like a sore thumb. I could be doing it a disservice as I've not seen it in life but even Whipsnade's ancient bear exhibit is better and that is because it looks like a bit of 'wild' that has a fence around it.
However... WW's main appeal is that it is a small zoo situated amongst established woodland. You come across exhibits while walking along woodland paths. In fact if the exhibits were not in woodland (say farm paddocks) WW would look downright terrible as most of the fencing is basic wooden posts and mesh. It is the mature trees which make the world of difference. But that bear exhibit could be in any smaller zoo that wasn't fussed with making it look natural. It stands out like a sore thumb. I could be doing it a disservice as I've not seen it in life but even Whipsnade's ancient bear exhibit is better and that is because it looks like a bit of 'wild' that has a fence around it.