Sun Wukong
Well-Known Member
Manatees would be great as they are under threat in many places! The don't require as much space and as far as I know, have never been kept in the UK before.
Objection!
1. Just because they are not as agile as cetaceans doesn't mean that manatees do not require much space; quite the contrary, as after all, they are pretty large animals.
2. Amazonian manatees were kept in London in 1875 for 5 weeks and 1889for 5 months; an African manatee was kept in London in 1875 for one month.
ZootierlisteHomepage
3. Just because an animal is "under threat", it doesn't have to be kept in a zoo...
@vs0u2086: Mentioning media-savvy Ric O'Berry is rather a deterrent than a sign of quality...
As a veterinarian, you should know of the benefits gained for the sake of all sick cetacea by the husbandry & treatment experiences of captive cetacea . What was learned by pioneers such as David Taylor or Bernhard Neurohr can now be put to use to help cetacea in need of veterinary treatment. Without this gain of knowlegde, textbooks like the CRC Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine or the apt bits & chapters within the Fowler & Miller copies would have been way shorter and less comprehensive (than they sometimes already are...
Indeed, there are many animal species that can't and shouldn't be kept in zoos due to various reasons (food specialisation, size, special reproduction cycle...). This subject has been discussed again and again on this forum. But some cetacea species like Beluga whales or bottlenose dolphins (especially from inshore populations) seem to do just as fine in captivity as various other popular zoo species, if given the right husbandry. Why should enclosure size be a knock-out criterion for the husbandry of cetacea, but not so for, say, manatees? Cetacea shouldn't get special treatment just because of emotional reasons & current zeitgeist.
Last edited: