Worst Zoo in the U.S. You've Ever Been To

The zoo is heavily controlled by the county and many residents want the place gone, so any sort of upgrade or improvement is a fight.
Nearly everything at the zoo is from the last 20 years, it is amazing what they've managed to do with the place.
With regards to the "residents" who want the place gone and have stifled any form of positive development... What a bunch of antediluvian, addle-pated lumps of anthracite. What a bunch of bathtub brigadiers. What a bunch of clumsy-footed quadrupeds. What a bunch of dictatorial, duck-billed diplodocuses. What a bunch of ectoplasmic entrails. What a bunch of freshwater flat-foots. What a bunch of guano gatherers. What a bunch of hijacking hooligans. What a bunch of iconoclastic ignoramuses. What a bunch of jellied jokers. What a bunch of kooky kleptomaniacs. What a bunch of lily-livered landlubbers. What a bunch of miserable molecules of mildew. What a bunch of nitwitted ninepins. What a bunch of overstuffed, odd-toed ostrogoths. What a bunch of pithecanthropic, pestilential, parasitic, prattling paranoiacs. What a bunch of quivering quitters. What a bunch of raggle-taggle ruminants. What a bunch of suffering seagulls. What a bunch of tin-hatted, tyrannical, two-timing, tantrum-throwing tyrants. What a bunch of unspeakable usurpers. What a bunch of vagabondic vermicellis. What a bunch of whippersnapping weevils. What a bunch of eXcortiating xenophobes. What a bunch of yellow-bellied yeggs. What a bunch of zealous zombies. My point in all of this antiquated rambling is that NIMBYs are some of the most annoying, bothersome, confounding, detrimental, evil, foul, ghoulish, hellish, ignorant, jealous, killjoy, lackadaisical, melodramatic, nitwitted, overbearing, pretentious, quixotic, rude, sycophantic, tacky, unbearable, volatile, wimpy, xeric, yattering zibs that have ever had the pathetic misfortune of polluting everything that can be and has been positive about society. Ever wonder why the phrases "boomer" and "Karen" became popular?

P.S. since I can't curse, this is the next best thing I can do.
 
Last edited:
With regards to the "residents" who want the place gone and have stifled any form of positive development... What a bunch of antediluvian, addle-pated lumps of anthracite. What a bunch of bathtub brigadiers. What a bunch of clumsy-footed quadrupeds. What a bunch of dictatorial, duck-billed diplodocuses. What a bunch of ectoplasmic entrails. What a bunch of freshwater flat-foots. What a bunch of guano gatherers. What a bunch of hijacking hooligans. What a bunch of iconoclastic ignoramuses. What a bunch of jellied jokers. What a bunch of kooky kleptomaniacs. What a bunch of lily-livered landlubbers. What a bunch of miserable molecules of mildew. What a bunch of nitwitted ninepins. What a bunch of overstuffed, odd-toed ostrogoths. What a bunch of pithecanthropic, pestilential, parasitic, prattling paranoiacs. What a bunch of quivering quitters. What a bunch of raggle-taggle ruminants. What a bunch of suffering seagulls. What a bunch of tin-hatted, tyrannical, two-timing, tantrum-throwing tyrants. What a bunch of unspeakable usurpers. What a bunch of vagabondic vermicellis. What a bunch of whippersnapping weevils. What a bunch of eXcortiating xenophobes. What a bunch of yellow-bellied yeggs. What a bunch of zealous zombies. My point in all of this antiquated rambling is that NIMBYs are some of the most annoying, bothersome, confounding, detrimental, evil, foul, ghoulish, hellish, ignorant, jealous, killjoy, lackadaisical, melodramatic, nitwitted, overbearing, pretentious, quixotic, rude, sycophantic, tacky, unbearable, volatile, wimpy, xeric, yattering zibs that have ever had the pathetic misfortune of polluting everything that can be and has been positive about society. Ever wonder why the phrases "boomer" and "Karen" became popular?

P.S. since I can't curse, this is the next best thing I can do.

So, you're enjoying that thesaurus you were given for Christmas?
 
If you're ranking Adventure and Newport Aquariums - two facilities which I have not visited but heard lots of good things about - as 'the worst zoos in the US you've ever been to" then clearly you've never been to even a remotely bad zoo in the US.

That's probably true, to be fair.
 
Worst Zoological Facility Visited - Triangle Metro Zoo
  • It was everything you could expect from a small, unaccredited, roadside zoo. Many animals, including ABC species like Lions, Bears, etc. were kept in small sterile cages with concrete floors and little in the way of enrichment. There was maybe one or two exhibits that were just fenced in lots of woods and pasture that were the best the zoo had to offer. There was this tent/pavilion that had a bunch of smaller animals; there were camel rides, etc. Everything was just haphazardly placed. Additionally, its location, in a rural sparsely-developed community off the main roads and very well hidden, meant that it didn't attract many people at all and the zoo basically struggled for its entire existence until it closed for good in 2006.
  • The Long Island Reptile Museum, which only operated from 1995-2004, may have been even worse, based on an article I linked below*. As I visited this attraction at an even younger age, I have next-to-no memory of what the experience or quality was like, which is the only reason I am not listing it above TMZ. If the article is anything to go by though, this place would have topped a worst zoos of all time list easily.
Worst non-AZA Facility - Gatorland USA (Orlando, FL):
  • Not a truly bad place by any stretch, and may be worth checking out if you are in the area for other reasons and have time to spare, but it's not a place I can ever see myself revisiting again. What they do have is good, but their collection is very limited, exhibit quality is all over the place, and it does give off "roadside zoo" vibes in certain areas.
Worst AZA Facility - SeaLife Orlando (Orlando, FL)
  • I visited this on a Sunday, so this may have impacted my experience. Regardless, I found it to be inferior to the SeaLife facility in Charlotte, NC. The exhibit layout lacks the logical flow that Charlotte-Concord had (which starts from freshwater and works its way out to the ocean; Orlando just throws a bunch of tropical fish at you in the very first room), it was too crowded, and it had too many gimmicky exhibit designs. That said, I did like the 360 degree shark tunnel and the Axolotls.
*Further reading for the Long Island Reptile Museum -> https://www.researchgate.net/public...ed_reptile_zoo_The_Long_Island_Reptile_Museum
 
Worst Zoological Facility Visited - Triangle Metro Zoo
  • It was everything you could expect from a small, unaccredited, roadside zoo. Many animals, including ABC species like Lions, Bears, etc. were kept in small sterile cages with concrete floors and little in the way of enrichment. There was maybe one or two exhibits that were just fenced in lots of woods and pasture that were the best the zoo had to offer. There was this tent/pavilion that had a bunch of smaller animals; there were camel rides, etc. Everything was just haphazardly placed. Additionally, its location, in a rural sparsely-developed community off the main roads and very well hidden, meant that it didn't attract many people at all and the zoo basically struggled for its entire existence until it closed for good in 2006.
  • The Long Island Reptile Museum, which only operated from 1995-2004, may have been even worse, based on an article I linked below*. As I visited this attraction at an even younger age, I have next-to-no memory of what the experience or quality was like, which is the only reason I am not listing it above TMZ. If the article is anything to go by though, this place would have topped a worst zoos of all time list easily.
Worst non-AZA Facility - Gatorland USA (Orlando, FL):
  • Not a truly bad place by any stretch, and may be worth checking out if you are in the area for other reasons and have time to spare, but it's not a place I can ever see myself revisiting again. What they do have is good, but their collection is very limited, exhibit quality is all over the place, and it does give off "roadside zoo" vibes in certain areas.
Worst AZA Facility - SeaLife Orlando (Orlando, FL)
  • I visited this on a Sunday, so this may have impacted my experience. Regardless, I found it to be inferior to the SeaLife facility in Charlotte, NC. The exhibit layout lacks the logical flow that Charlotte-Concord had (which starts from freshwater and works its way out to the ocean; Orlando just throws a bunch of tropical fish at you in the very first room), it was too crowded, and it had too many gimmicky exhibit designs. That said, I did like the 360 degree shark tunnel and the Axolotls.
*Further reading for the Long Island Reptile Museum -> https://www.researchgate.net/public...ed_reptile_zoo_The_Long_Island_Reptile_Museum

Triangle didn't look as bad as I was expecting! It's definitely not good, but the video I found (
) is from 23 years ago and I can name plenty of places that look like this *now*. I'm most surprised by the location, given how rich that area is. According to wikipedia, "Shortly after the zoo opened in 1998, the barn containing the gift shop and restrooms burned down, and was never rebuilt. The owner cited lack of facilities at the zoo due to this fire, which prevented him from putting up a permanent sign on Capital Boulevard, as one of many factors that led to the lack of funds for the zoo and its eventual closure. ... Seibel closed the zoo in February 2006, citing money and personal problems, as well as encroaching development that would require him to fence the entire property."

Reading the article about the LI museum now, thanks for linking it. This font is awful :D Long Island seems to have an abundant amount of lousy animal-related places, with nothing truly decent coming along.
 
The Wild Animal Safari in Georgia, by far! The zoo had typical roadside favorites (African pygmy goats, green iguanas, etc.) and the “Ligers”. However what really shocked me was the amount of rare species on display. The zoo had night monkeys, Eld’s deer, Geoffrey’s cats, and what seemed to be either a Fanaloka, or a Rusty-Spotted Genet, but was labeled a “Linsang”
 
The Wild Animal Safari in Georgia, by far! The zoo had typical roadside favorites (African pygmy goats, green iguanas, etc.) and the “Ligers”. However what really shocked me was the amount of rare species on display. The zoo had night monkeys, Eld’s deer, Geoffrey’s cats, and what seemed to be either a Fanaloka, or a Rusty-Spotted Genet, but was labeled a “Linsang”
a Linsang is a real animal, they also look similar to genets but genetically are closest to felids, but asfaik no linsangs are in the US, but I wouldn't put it pass a bad roadside zoo to illegally import a rare animal like a linsang.
 
The worst major zoo I have been to would be the Kansas City Zoo, circa 2018 (time of my last visit). It is by no means a bad zoo, or at least not at the time (there was a time it probably could have been considered genuinely bad, but by that point they had pretty much fixed their issues). Some of it is really well done, like for example the Africa section. I genuinely love their cheetah and lion exhibits in particular. That being said, the only other zoos I have been to happen to be three of the best zoos in the country (Saint Louis, Omaha, and San Diego) and it just cannot compete with them.
The worst animal facility I have been to would probably be Cedar Cove Feline Conservatory in Kansas about two hours or so out from Kansas City. It was an interesting experience, and I do feel like the people working there had a lot of good information, but the accommodations for the animals, especially the tigers, of which they had many, were just inexcusable. I think the facility is well-intentioned, but I am not sure the rescued animals are in a better situation than the ones they came from. They just lacked the resources needed to care for such large and demanding animals. There's also the defunct World Aquarium inside the City Museum in Saint Louis, that while it had some animals that I was very excited to see at 14 (at the time I was obsessed with genets so I was over the moon when they had one), but the exhibits the animals were being kept in ranged from in inadequate to abhorrent, and were just not well maintained. The genet exhibit was particularly awful. It was literally just a narrow little rectangular room with a couple branches and a stool or step of some kind. Unfortunately that particular exhibit seems to be lost to time but many of the questionable exhibits live on in the zoochat gallery.
 
No pics and don't remember the name, but several times I have seen a traveling zoo at various Michigan fairs that was rather abhorrent. 3 full size alligators in a tiny concrete cell that wouldn't even hold one, a reticulated python that is unable to ever stretch out, maybe 5 ring tailed lemurs in a cramped cage with nothing but a single branch, overworked pony ride ponies with severely overgrown hooves, the list goes on. Can't decide what the worst part is: a bad childhood memory of their aviary where because I didn't buy food all the budgies, sun conures, and an Amazon attacked me until I fainted of stress and heat exhaustion, (they wouldn't give my mom a refund) the fact that I remember them having elephant rides, (its been a while since I've seen them though so I hope those elephants were siezed and are somewhere with actual mental stimulation) the fact that people always flock to these parts of the fair, (more so than the livestock shows, which are the only reason I ever come in contact with this "enterprise" in the first place) or the fact that they always post big signs claiming that they are legal within the USDA, making it even more sad cause now you know nothing you say will work.

As for permanent zoos, can't decide whether Indian Creek Zoo or Timber Creek Petting Farm were worse. The latter made me outright have a talk with my mom about looking for accreditation and not trusting a website that says it's a "sanctuary" (as opposed to some ladies backyard you have to pay 15 bucks to enter where there is no signage hence many other peoples confusion over what animals like the maras were, wet paint in the exhibits that turned a pig blue, a 10x10 foot kangaroo exhibit, and a lone nilgai getting gangraped by a swarm of intact pygmy goat bucks which the lady didn't give a darn about).

With this thread getting resurrected, I want to update this by stating that the past few times I've encountered the traveling zoo at fairs, it has been MUCH better. They still do the pony rides, which I don't know how to feel about, but the ponies have much better hooves. Every "exotic" animal, even the pet ones like the budgies and smaller reptiles, now appear to be gone. Instead, it's firmly farm animal focused now, and to my knowledge everyone - goats, sheep, rabbits, chickens, alpacas, a mini pig, a Dexter steer, and a miniature zebu - looks healthy, a contrast to how that same pasture setup would look before. Indeed, the past few times I actually have been actively checking it out to say hi to the cute and friendly animals. I wonder if it got new owners that went through the effort to greatly clean things up compared to before.

Indeed, the realization of just plain how much better the traveling zoo is now that it is purely domestic has got me thinking. So many roadside zoos would be so much better if they were just farm animal petting zoos instead. Care of farm animals is so much more readily available than care of wild exotics like tigers and alligators. These roadside zoos seem to be cases of petting farms that, perhaps feeling threatened by the AZA zoos having the "cooler" animals, end up feeling like they have to bite off far more than they can chew. In reality, with only farm animals, they'll do just fine! I have not seen a drop in the big crowds around the traveling zoo at fairs at all, permanent publicly-visitable farms I've visited like Wolcott Mill Metropark and The Critter Barn generally have a good amount of people around them when I'm there, and heck, even at large AZA zoos with major ABC species, people STILL go to the farm sections to see the animals - if I remember correctly from being there, the Barnyard at the Toledo Zoo was so popular in its opening week that it was an outright chaotic area. Seriously, people. Think straight before you become an animal abuser. I'm sure many of you are farmers already.

Indeed, the way I've always thought of doing things if I ever started a facility is to start with just small to medium domestics (chickens, ducks, geese, goats, sheep, maybe mini pigs, maybe rabbits, maybe some herding or livestock guardian dogs or some barn cats - absolutely no cattle, horses, or full size farm hogs, at least to start with) and reasonable exotics (wild ducks, especially great lakes native ones for nature education like wood ducks, canvasbacks, and mergansers, pheasants, quail, chukar, maybe some small herptiles and inverts both native and exotic like ball pythons, corn snakes, milk snakes, Kenyan sand boas, painted turtles, red footed tortoises, leopard geckos, bearded dragons, uromastyx, White's tree frogs, poison dart frogs, Madagascar hissing cockroaches, blue death feigning beetles, and whip scorpions, and maybe a community freshwater tank). I would let that settle for a good long while before I made sure that I had absolutely ALL I needed to go more exotic, ideas popping in my brain just now are rescue foxes and birds of prey and muntjacs, maras, kangaroos, wallabies, and nilgai (out of Timber Creek vengeance for the last one, man I loved that poor sweetheart, check my old reply on Neil Chace's old Animal Adventures post for more info) that I'd rescue from other roadsides if possible. There'd be lines I'd never cross, like primates and large carnivores. Heck, I don't even know if I would do raccoons. There would be plenty of space for restored habitat that people could hike on their visit in addition to seeing the animals.

"Hey Prawn, why did you go off on a tangent about your dream job?"

Because I want to make it undeniably clear that you can, in fact, make an interesting, fun, educational, humane non-AZA facility without shoving a tiger in a tiny cage.
 
My worst zoo was definitely the Natural Bridge Zoo in Virginia. That zoo is the reason why I became interested in looking up information about zoos, particularly before i go. I was 10 years old and saw a flier for the zoo at a rest stop while on vacation and asked my parents to take me. They did and I felt guilty about it for years (and had nightmares). I grew up going to the National Zoo and didn't know that there were still zoos like the Natural Bridge Zoo.

This place was grim when I went there as a kid, and it doesn't seem great now, either (though it sounds like they have fewer animals, at least). I think they've had something like 150 citations against them over the years. A lot of the animals were in small metal and concrete cages, there was a single elephant giving elephant rides in a sunny field with no shade, sick-looking animals, and a pig with an open wound in the petting zoo area. They had white tiger cub-petting sessions you could purchase in the gift shop.

Shortly after I went, two Asiatic black bears escaped from their cage and made their way to a local guy's house. They were shot by the police.

Take the Humane Society's angle with a grain of salt if you wish, but they filmed "undercover" at the zoo (had someone get a job there and document with a hidden camera) and there is some pretty disturbing content showing dead or dying animals, people hitting animals, and that kind of thing-- you can watch it on YouTube if you wish.

The other not-so-great roadside zoo I visited as a kid was the Catoctin Zoo, but although I haven't been back in person, that place does seem to have improved from pictures I've seen.
 
My worst zoo was definitely the Natural Bridge Zoo in Virginia. That zoo is the reason why I became interested in looking up information about zoos, particularly before i go. I was 10 years old and saw a flier for the zoo at a rest stop while on vacation and asked my parents to take me. They did and I felt guilty about it for years (and had nightmares). I grew up going to the National Zoo and didn't know that there were still zoos like the Natural Bridge Zoo.

This place was grim when I went there as a kid, and it doesn't seem great now, either (though it sounds like they have fewer animals, at least). I think they've had something like 150 citations against them over the years. A lot of the animals were in small metal and concrete cages, there was a single elephant giving elephant rides in a sunny field with no shade, sick-looking animals, and a pig with an open wound in the petting zoo area. They had white tiger cub-petting sessions you could purchase in the gift shop.

Shortly after I went, two Asiatic black bears escaped from their cage and made their way to a local guy's house. They were shot by the police.

Take the Humane Society's angle with a grain of salt if you wish, but they filmed "undercover" at the zoo (had someone get a job there and document with a hidden camera) and there is some pretty disturbing content showing dead or dying animals, people hitting animals, and that kind of thing-- you can watch it on YouTube if you wish.

The other not-so-great roadside zoo I visited as a kid was the Catoctin Zoo, but although I haven't been back in person, that place does seem to have improved from pictures I've seen.

It's still not a great place but, given the bear escape was in 2003, it's certainly improved a bit in the last 20 years.
 
Hmm, my worst is probably Gatorama in Palmdale Florida near Lake Okeechobee, which to be honest is not that bad. It could be way worse, but with a little effort it could be a lot better too. My trip report from 2021 is here.
 
It's still not a great place but, given the bear escape was in 2003, it's certainly improved a bit in the last 20 years.

The Natural Bridge Zoo? I am glad to hear that. I can't believe they still have that lone elephant, though. I know you've said they don't have bears anymore and that was by far one of the worst exhibits. It sounds like they've maybe eased off on the promoting cub petting, which is good, because they were letting people get photos with tigers that were big enough to do some real harm.

I will say for anyone who visited the Catoctin Zoo recently-- I think I've seen you've posted photos from there-- those larger exhibits with the glass window weren't there during my visits as a child, and neither was the safari area. They had several concrete floored cages with thick metal bars (the worst one was the grizzly bear, who has since passed away-- it sounds like they still have the sun bear cage, but it seems to have more natural substrate and enrichment in it now), and large predators like lions, tigers, mountain lions, and wolves in flimsily fenced in areas. I wasn't shocked to hear that the wolves somehow got under the fence and dragged a mountain lion into their enclosure and killed it, or that the jaguars mauled a keeper.

The keepers always did seem to care about the animals, though, and the grounds were nice with lots of shade, and the place felt way less grim and disturbing than the Natural Bridge Zoo. It just had a weird haphazard vibe to it.
 
The Wild Animal Safari in Georgia, by far! The zoo had typical roadside favorites (African pygmy goats, green iguanas, etc.) and the “Ligers”. However what really shocked me was the amount of rare species on display. The zoo had night monkeys, Eld’s deer, Geoffrey’s cats, and what seemed to be either a Fanaloka, or a Rusty-Spotted Genet, but was labeled a “Linsang”
Are you talking about the Pine Mountain Safari or is it a different Georgia safari park? When did you visit? Because none of those species were there when I visited in January. They do have rarities like Gaur and Grison though.

----

As for my worst, this was visited after the last update to my rankings but its without a doubt Big Cat Habitat Gulf Coast Sanctuary. I've visited my share of stinkers but this is easily the #1 worst place because it fails at all four important zoo aspects - bad quality, poor collection, overpriced and bad conservation/social message. And as an added bonus, also has a terrible name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSO
Back
Top