San Diego's lion grotto opened up in 1923, while Bronx' lion habitat opened up in the 1940s.
Right you are! That's good to know, thanks.
~Thylo
San Diego's lion grotto opened up in 1923, while Bronx' lion habitat opened up in the 1940s.
I think this reason is why I'm not sure if it is a good idea, a damage in reputation could cause more harm than good in some circumstances. Though, further education in and outside the zoo could potentially alter public perception.It’s a win-win for all except the zoo’s marketing and communications department.
Yeah that will go over well.Zoos should let herbivore species breed without restriction and feed the surplus to carnivore species.
The most recent issue of AZA's magazine has an article calling in part for more cultural awareness in planning themed exhibits and incorporating native voices. An example of what not to do that they mentioned involved putting up totem poles in Arctic/polar bear exhibits, even though indigenous peoples from those regions don't use totem poles.I got another hot take coming up exhibit-designwise, I think temple-themed exhibits aren't a bad idea - if you're only focusing on a certain region and the temple architecture is culturally sound. The best examples of this would be Jacksonville's Range of the Jaguar, which utilizes temple-theming tastefully (along with Audubon's Jaguar Jungle as an honorable mention), as well as Fresno Chaffee Zoo's upcoming Kingdoms of Asia, which involves a heavy collaboration with Fresno's Khmer community (giving a significant boost authenticity-wise and PR-wise to boot). Malayan tigers make sense in an Angkor-Wat themed area, as there were populations of Malayan/Indochinese tigers living in Cambodia around that same time. So do animals like sun bears, clouded leopards, banteng, dhole, Siamese crocodile, Asian elephant, etc. That said, the temple facade shouldn't take up 100% of the habitat, and there should still be a predominant focus on nature. Again, going back to Jacksonville, the temple theming doesn't take up 100% of the complex, with the Emerald Forest aviary highlighting, well, a forest. Fresno also seems to be maintaining the "forest" environment for their orangutans, babirusa (and presumably Malayan tapir/muntjac), komodo dragons and rhinoceros hornbill, with the only predominant temple theming being present in the tiger and sloth bear habitats.
To sum up, temple theming good, only if authenticity/predominant focus on nature is present.
The most recent issue of AZA's magazine has an article calling in part for more cultural awareness in planning themed exhibits and incorporating native voices. An example of what not to do that they mentioned involved putting up totem poles in Arctic/polar bear exhibits, even though indigenous peoples from those regions don't use totem poles.
Simply calling them this is a hot take...They're literally the worst big cat
Didn't a zoo cause some controversy a while back by having a boma setup? I don't know the whole story but seem to remember reading that somewhere. Cultural awareness is good but needs to be handled carefully.The most recent issue of AZA's magazine has an article calling in part for more cultural awareness in planning themed exhibits and incorporating native voices. An example of what not to do that they mentioned involved putting up totem poles in Arctic/polar bear exhibits, even though indigenous peoples from those regions don't use totem poles.
Sometimes an older woman can be nice. Oh wait, you weren't talking about that kind of cougar were you?I literally cannot stand cougars. They're literally the worst big cat. Cheetahs are ten times better than any other big cat anyways.
Or South American in the case of some European zoos.Cougars are awesome, they may be common but they are an iconic part of the North American fauna.
Or South American in the case of some European zoos.
Since I've never seen them in the wild I don't mind seeing them in captivity.Cougars are awesome, they may be common but they are an iconic part of the North American fauna.
I've never seen them in the wild either, and I think if I did I still wouldn't have a problem with captive ones.Since I've never seen them in the wild I don't mind seeing them in captivity.
The most recent issue of AZA's magazine has an article calling in part for more cultural awareness in planning themed exhibits and incorporating native voices. An example of what not to do that they mentioned involved putting up totem poles in Arctic/polar bear exhibits, even though indigenous peoples from those regions don't use totem poles.
Seen their tracks several locations Yosemite National Park. Keeping pulse actively to see one in the wild. Felix Concolor- cat of one color. Ranging from north America. down central n south america!Since I've never seen them in the wild I don't mind seeing them in captivity.
FYI, the Cougar’s scientific name is no longer Felis concolor, but Puma concolor (monotypic genus). “Felix” is a misspelling of the genus Felis, which now contains only the wildcats (specifically the Asian, African, and European) and the domestic housecat.Seen their tracks several locations Yosemite National Park. Keeping pulse actively to see one in the wild. Felix Concolor- cat of one color. Ranging from north America. down central n south america!
Shadow cat, they see you long before one even knows they are there. Must seem youtube video out of utah. Female cougar bluffing trail runner on trail. Incredible footage.