Do they? All but two people so far have given them a point and I couldn't tell you anything about Wroclaw's standing from this thread.
That's a good point, I've just voted based on the fact that I've actually been so I remember the zoo.
I don't have much time to get in depth or post enclosure photos, but as a basic rundown of their highlights:
-Various rare ungulates such as Golden Takin, Alpine Ibex, Visayan Spotted Deer, and Dybowski's Sika Deer
-A nice newer carnivore complex for Snow and Clouded Leopards
-An Indian Rhinoceros/Pileated Gibbon mixed exhibit
-The only repeated breeding of Sulawesi Bear Cuscus
-Other rare mammals such as Red-and-White Giant Flying Squirrel, Lyle's Flying Fox, and Long-Eared Hedgehog
-Repeated captive breeding of imported Palawan Hornbill
-A few oddball amphibians such as Lake Urmia Newt and Indonesian Floating Frog
While the above makes a strong case for Wroclaw and the species list is mouthwatering, I still believe Omaha's larger collection and much stronger exhibits earn them the win. Wroclaw does also have one huge pitfall which Omaha lacks: they've been using the same house for Asian Elephants since the late 1800s! The house, while mostly closed to the public, is horribly small and in no way comes anywhere close to modern standards of keeping elephants. Additionally, while not awful, I found the soon to be refurbished aviaries lining the outdoors of the bird house to be rather poor as well.
~Thylo