2-1 for Bronx here. Not only a good collection, but being the frontrunner in the conservation of the popular American bison definitely gives extra bonus marks in my book.
I can only post mammals and birds for now as I have to be off to school but I'll come back to post the rest later.
Bronx
-American Bison
-North American Cougar (three wild-rescued orphans)
-Striped Skunk
-Western Spotted Skunk
-California Sea Lion (various wild-rescued animals)
-White-Nosed Coati (found in the United States so should count)
-Grizzly Bear (four wild-rescued animals)
-Sitka Brown Bear (three wild-rescued orphans)
-California Mouse
-Cactus Mouse
-North American Deer Mouse
-North American Porcupine
-Merriam's Kangaroo-Rat
-Eurasian Harvest Mouse
-Western House Mouse
-Harris's Antelope Squirrel
-Yellow-Bellied Marmot (one wild-rescued individual)
-Black-Tailed Prairie Dog
-American Golden Eagle (one wild-rescued individual)
-Bald Eagle (two wild-rescued individuals)
-Ring-Necked Duck
-Canvasback
-Emperor Goose
-Trumpeter Swan
-Hooded Merganser
-Smew
-American Ruddy Duck
-Cinnamon Teal
-Bufflehead
-Eurasian Kestrel
-Tufted Puffin
-American Black Oystercatcher
-Eurasian Oystercatcher
-Forster's Tern
-Common Tern
-Pied Avocet
-Western Capercaillie
-Black-Billed Magpie
-Song Thrush
-Snowy Egret
-Black-Crowned Night-Heron
-Brown Pelican
-Roseate Spoonbill
-American Flamingo
-Monk Parakeet (imagine these don't count but they're heavily introduced to both continents so I included them for now)
-Burrowing Owl
-Eurasian Eagle-Owl
-Snowy Owl
-Great Horned Owl (ssp. heterocnemis)
-Barred Owl (wild-rescued individuals)
-Anhinga
The Bronx is the zoo that saved the American Bison from extinction. Their efforts are what pushed for governmental protection for the species and saw hundreds of animals reintroduced back into the wild all across the nation. Today, they are one of the few zoos still breeding herds of bison (they have over 30) and are committed to breeding genetically pure nominate animals, either through the import of new pure founders or through artificial insemination of impure animals with pure genes. The zoo is also the only one in the US to breed capercaillie, which they specifically imported from European zoos.
As I mentioned before, I'll come back later to finish the species list and post more about their conservation efforts.
~Thylo
But Mexico isn't part of Central America. I left Mexican species out of my original post just in case but ecologically Mexico is mostly more in line with the Southwest United States than with Central America.
Just to be clear, I'm not saying that Mexico isn't physically a part of North America - I'm saying that going by zoogeography as the game is, then there are a whole lot of Neotropical species in Mexico so by including Mexico in North America (for the purposes of this game) it negates putting Central America (which is also physically part of North America) under South America.Tentatively including Mexican species (as I firmly believe they should count)
Just to be clear, I'm not saying that Mexico isn't physically a part of North America - I'm saying that going by zoogeography as the game is, then there are a whole lot of Neotropical species in Mexico so by including Mexico in North America (for the purposes of this game) it negates putting Central America (which is also physically part of North America) under South America.
I'm hoping I also make @CGSwans' head hurt.
Not to get into the debate over what constitutes "North America" or not, but there's really no way this species should have any relevance in this thread at all - within North America they're only present in Costa Rica and Panama.Tentatively including Mexican species (as I firmly believe they should count) and adding in the many birds I missed/forgot about, this is the current Bronx lineup (additions in bold):
Grey-Necked Wood-Rail
Not to get into the debate over what constitutes "North America" or not, but there's really no way this species should have any relevance in this thread at all - within North America they're only present in Costa Rica and Panama.
Interesting! Apparently it's because HBW doesn't split Rufous-naped wood rail, Aramides albiventris (which all other relevant taxonomic entities do split) from Grey-necked wood rail, A.cajaneus (which doesn't occur to the North of Costa Rica). This adds another interesting dynamic of what to do with different taxonomic entities treating certain species differently, and thus having different range descriptions...
Interesting! Apparently it's because HBW doesn't split Rufous-naped wood rail, Aramides albiventris (which all other relevant taxonomic entities do split) from Grey-necked wood rail, A.cajaneus (which doesn't occur to the North of Costa Rica). This adds another interesting dynamic of what to do with different taxonomic entities treating certain species differently, and thus having different range descriptions...
The Bronx bird definitely doesn't have a rufous nape though, as can be seen in this picture, so definitely isn't any of the mexicanus, albiventris or vanrossemi subspecies, which would be the only subspecies counting in a hypothetical "Canada + USA + Mexico" category regardless of whether or not you assign those species to A.albiventris or A.cajaneus.
That's why I suggested earlier that "Palaearctic" species in Mexico (e.g. pronghorns, wolves, etc) could be counted under North America, while the "Neotropical" species (e.g. monkeys, guans, etc) could be counted under South America. I think it'd be pretty easy to determine which species go where, in general.Conversely, there are a whole lot of desert/forest dwelling species in Mexico that live right along the border of the US that no longer cross over only due to Human activities which wouldn't make any sense to exclude. Simultaneously, counting Mexico as South/Central American would be including species like Pronghorn as neotropical, which is also nonsense.
That's why I suggested earlier that "Palaearctic" species in Mexico (e.g. pronghorns, wolves, etc) could be counted under North America, while the "Neotropical" species (e.g. monkeys, guans, etc) could be counted under South America. I think it'd be pretty easy to determine which species go where, in general.
This would be my preference. The logic of including Central America with South, rather than North America is that the local fauna are broadly similar. That holds true for southern Mexico but not really the north, and where species *do* range across the entire country they can be eligible for both regions.
My gut tells me it shouldn't be too hard or controversial to work out when a Mexican species is appropriate for North America, South and Central America or both. Spider monkeys? South & Central America. Black bears? North America. Pumas? Both.
As a more general observation, I would encourage everybody to be less forensically focused on eligibility. At the moment threads are getting too hung up on working out the exact eligibility of given species, and while accuracy is self-evidently desirable, I'm worried that it's being focused on at the expense of broader discussion across other factors. Unless your vote really does hinge on whether the species collection margin is 54 vs 40 rather than 52 vs 39 (which is valid but, I posit, somewhat self-limiting), then to a certain extent you're better off shrugging your shoulders about the grey-necked wood-rail and moving on.
This latter point - a willingness to live with slightly blurred lines of eligibility - is going to be really quite essential in the next format following this one.
With that in mind...
Here are some photos of Bronx's enclosures:
Brown Bear
![]()
I'm not going through every single species that's up for debate, but seriously, Barbary macaques are a definitive European species in my opinion. Don't care if anyone agrees or disagrees but I'm just saying that I personally count them.