ZooChat Cup Group F: Bronx vs Leipzig

Bronx vs Leipzig: Miscellaneous mammals


  • Total voters
    35
  • Poll closed .
Seems a bit of a pity that such a close-run match with good points made on all sides comes down to a near-tie broken by a single issue voter who hasn't been online for nearly 48 hours.....

That is true.... :(
I guess he loves pangolins sooo much that he will not listen to an argument against them...
:(
 
I don't think anyone in this thread (barring perhaps a small number of us) would be arguing against pangolins anyhow :p

Well...I do remember someone (I think @ThylacineAlive ) uttering a blasphemy in saying that pangolins were not special to see and that once you had seen the once, it wasn't impressive. I think someone else then replied saying the same from platypi. I seem to remember it was @CGSwans but I may be wrong...
 
Well.... look at his username... :)
That is true.... :(
I guess he loves pangolins sooo much that he will not listen to an argument against them...
:(

What is this argument, though? One could easily say, "Well, Leipzig does keep Chinese Pangolins but they don't really do much to conserve them in the wild, whereas Bronx is committing millions of dollars a year to combating the pangolin trade for most, if not all eight species in the wild as well as protecting their native habitat. I love pangolins, and Bronx does more for them despite not currently keeping any, so I'm going to vote for Bronx." Regardless, the user himself isn't actually qualifying his vote.

Seems a bit of a pity that such a close-run match with good points made on all sides comes down to a near-tie broken by a single issue voter who hasn't been online for nearly 48 hours.....

Agreed, especially when they did the same exact thing at the last minute in the Pairi vs Denver match.

Well...I do remember someone (I think @ThylacineAlive ) uttering a blasphemy in saying that pangolins were not special to see and that once you had seen the once, it wasn't impressive. I think someone else then replied saying the same from platypi. I seem to remember it was @CGSwans but I may be wrong...

If I ever said that, I would have been joking (I somewhat remember the Platypus comment, not the pangolin one, though). Pangolins are the main reason I visited Leipzig in the first place and I 100% support zoos working with them, as I said in my initial post on the thread. I've never tried to argue against pangolins, nor do I wish to belittle Leipzig's commitment to attempting to breed them, I've simply tried to argue that Bronx's conservation efforts towards them in the wild outweigh Leipzig simply keeping some in my opinion.

@ThylacineAlive You raise an interesting point concerning the viability of populations of rare animals. Maybe of the rare animals in zoos. Especially if they are rare within the zoo community, don't have viable populations if we look 20 or more years ahead. I recently saw a presentation at Burgers Zoo about breeding and viability of populations within zoos of certain species, it doesn't look good. For many populations the number of animals and genetic variation is simple to low for future sustainable population holding. I believe that something like 75% of bird species and 30% of mammal species, don't score viable for self-sustaining populations at the moment.

Now one can question what to do with populations that don't seem viable in the long run. In Leipzigscase some animals certainly are within this category. Where even the best conservations efforts probably won't deliver us sustainable populations in zoos, let alone reintroducing them for the wild. As it currently stands. Although I do still love to see them and think they could be great ambassadors for their last wild cousins. Personally, I don't know to evaluate this dilemma.

I don't like or think it is ethical to bring wild animals into captivity, even though it could certainly help with the genetics problem. The only for reserve population purposes this might be done if you ask me. Like with the Tasmanian devil.

To conclude I think we should celebrate the rareties we currently have in zoos because in 20 years most animal species in zoos will be relatively common.

Long-term viability in zoos is almost always a sad subject unfortunately. I know in the AZA there are very few species whose genetic populations are large enough to survive the next 50+ years. That's why I support Bronx keeping such large breeding groups of these oddball rodents, though I do agree that we should appreciate the dying off populations while we still have them. I was very happy to see the mole-rats and giant squirrels at Leipzig during my visit.

~Thylo
 
Last edited:
What is this argument, though? One could easily say, "Well, Leipzig does keep Chinese Pangolins but they don't really do much to conserve them in the wild, whereas Bronx is committing millions of dollars a year to combating the pangolin trade for most, if not all eight species in the wild as well as protecting their native habitat. I love pangolins, and Bronx does more for them despite not currently keeping any, so I'm going to vote for Bronx." Regardless, the user himself isn't actually qualifying his vote.

I certainly wasn't defending him/her...

Agreed, especially when they did the same exact thing at the last minute in the Pairi vs Denver match.

When? What happened?

If I ever said that, I would have been joking (I somewhat remember the Platypus comment, not the pangolin one, though). Pangolins are the main reason I visited Leipzig in the first place and I 100% support zoos working with them, as I said in my initial post on the thread. I've never tried to argue against pangolins, nor do I wish to belittle Leipzig's commitment to attempting to breed them, I've simply tried to argue that Bronx's conservation efforts towards them in the wild outweigh Leipzig simply keeping some in my opinion.

OK, ok, ok I know it was a joke....
 
When? What happened?

Last round, as soon as Denver started winning the match, pangolin12 and a couple others randomly switched their votes to 3-0 Pairi and never responded to requests to explain their sudden switch. Makes it a bit obvious in my opinion but that's for others to decide.

OK, ok, ok I know it was a joke....

I know, I was just clarifying for you or anyone else :)

~Thylo
 
Last round, as soon as Denver started winning the match, pangolin12 and a couple others randomly switched their votes to 3-0 Pairi and never responded to requests to explain their sudden switch. Makes it a bit obvious in my opinion but that's for others to decide.

Really? That is shocking! I know I was advocating Pairi, but at the end I kinda felt as if Denver might have deserved it...
Did Pairi win then?

I know, I was just clarifying for you or anyone else :)

~Thylo

OK thx :)
A species that I find slightly underwhelming after 10 seconds is koalas. I'm a disappointing human being, I know, but...
 
I don't think it is at all likely that I am going to change my vote... I really do believe in my vote's scoreline and I certainly am not going to change to either 2-1 Bronx or 3-0 Leipzig unless another compelling argument is put forward either way...

I know that Bronx has done a lot for pangolin conservation, but then again by housing them, Leipzig is allowing the public to see these genuinely cute animals, and therefore it means the general public is able to see a species they almost certainly wouldn't otherwise, which is one of the founding objectives of zoos in the first place. So though Bronx may well be doing more in terms of actual conservation in situ, the conservation and public stimulation ex-situ is also important - after all, it is the public that gives the zoos the money to be able to participate in these programs.
You never know, some random kid in Leipzig may us grow up loving pangolins because of their experiences with them at the zoo and decide to devote their life to saving them... :)
 
Seems a bit of a pity that such a close-run match with good points made on all sides comes down to a near-tie broken by a single issue voter who hasn't been online for nearly 48 hours.....

For what it’s worth, I’m satisfied in the integrity of this outcome. It makes gut-check sense to me that somebody who names themselves after pangolins would consider their presence at the zoo to be an overwhelming point in their favour, which is in fact the rationale Pangolin12 gave for their vote early in the thread. While it’s a shame they weren’t online later in the thread to continue to advocate for their view, that’s sometimes the way it roles: they can’t post if they aren’t online.

Thank you to all who participated in the thread, especially after my post yesterday. I think a great 53-52 tussle is ending on a less sour note than it might have.
 
Back
Top