Obviously, as a zoo fan, I think that public money going into zoos is a good thing (even if the zoo in question is private and the richest in the country). What troubles me is the message this project sends. In 2016, Beauval’s lagoon project was rejected. In 2021 a law was passed to end cetacean captivity in France. Now, the same state and NGOs that pushed for that same law are supporting the construction of a brand-new dolphin facility.
I imagine many people who supported the 2021 law won’t be thrilled to see millions of euros redirected into building another dolphin enclosure. To me, it feels less like progress for animal welfare and more like a sign of weakness or compromise from both the government and NGOs, an uneasy outcome where Beauval ends up looking like the big winner. Furthermore, the irony of the ecological problem I pointed out is amplified by the fact that the ministry responsible for this project is called the “Ministry of Ecological Transition, Biodiversity, Forests, Sea and Fishery”... To sum up, my problem is more with the form than with the substance.
I don´t understand your point. I think is wise to take a backward stepe when things require it. Nine years ago there were several projects for different dolphin sanctuaries, was reasonable for NGO and government to expect them to be finished once the law come into effect, but that have not been the case. The Beauval project will in fact be that sanctuary. Late, but better than never. Those animals need a place to live.
About the ecological problem, are you worried about it with any other new zoo enclosure? Because I´m pretty sure the impact won´t be worse that the dome construction and energy needs for its maintenance, for example.