Zoos on Paper: An Investigation of Zoo Maps

@Andrew_NZP Overall I think the Smithsonian map is okay. I don't like the animal head icons as much as I would like silhouettes or pictures or something, they don't seem very clear to me. Also I wish they could show the slopes and elevation differences, which is important since the entire zoo slopes down from the top of the map. I do agree on the great color scheme, though, and the paths are easy to follow with this.
 
This is Binder Park Zoo's map, pulled from the Dropbox supplied by @TinoPup. I really like this one for a few reasons. The first is that it features silhouettes AND species labels, the combination of which avoids a lot of ambiguity. I also like that they have distance and estimated completion time for a lot of the paths; I think this gives people a better sense of the zoo's size and terrain. The color coding is good too, with the two separate halves (African and not African) of the zoo clearly distinguished.

My only current complaint would be that, like many maps, it doesn't show individual enclosures, which isn't a big deal but I do prefer it.

p.jpeg
 
What are people's thoughts on cardinal orientation? I've noticed that zoos tend to orient their maps in all different directions with no clear pattern. Sometimes it annoys me a little if they aren't North-East-South-West oriented from top going clockwise as is the standard with most geographical maps I've seen, but I don't think it really makes much difference.
 
I much prefer them to be north-south orientated, although I can't think of any really good reason why I prefer it that way. Partly it might be because my first view if a zoo in map-form is on a road map/Google maps, where it is shown in correct orientation along with all the surrounding roads, route etc. Then, getting to the zoo and it's map having some random orientation is a little confusing.

I know that for London Zoo, the vast majority of their previous maps used north-south orientation, but their most recent ones haven't, and they just don't look quite right! :p
 
Florida really does seem to be where zoo map design goes to die. Behold the monstrosity that is the Brevard Zoo map.

I remember that all too vividly from planning my Florida trip in 2013. A truly appalling map, that manages to make a nice little zoo look like an empty little zoo by not actually labelling any of the animals (to the point it was only photos of the zoo on other sites that reassured me it was worth going..!).
 
What are people's thoughts on cardinal orientation? I've noticed that zoos tend to orient their maps in all different directions with no clear pattern. Sometimes it annoys me a little if they aren't North-East-South-West oriented from top going clockwise as is the standard with most geographical maps I've seen, but I don't think it really makes much difference.

It's a widely observed convention to have north at the top of a map but for example if you see the Detroit map I posted above, the zoo property wouldn't fit on an east-west map. For what it's worth, I don't hear people who are not familiar with the zoo complaining about the map.
 
in terms of functionality they're decent.

Is Jacksonville's really good in terms of functionality. All the paths are semicircles and none of the enclosures are depicted with any degree of accuracy.

Any tips on a route when visiting Colchester? When I visit for the first time in the summer, I don't want to end up walking around and around and exhausting myself.

I've only been there twice myself, but I would suggest going to the leopard and lion keeper talks (much more likely to see them active). The tigers are viewable at the end of the day. Don't really think any of the others need special times, although if you haven't fed an elephant ever, it is fun to do although there is always a queue to do it! Try and follow the sometimes not so helpful path lines on the map and if you do get lost, just walk decidedly in one direction and you will arrive at an enclosure depicted on the map.


Ah, Ok, I was trying to think of a reason why the zoo would have koalas and yet such a terrible map! :)
 
It's a widely observed convention to have north at the top of a map but for example if you see the Detroit map I posted above, the zoo property wouldn't fit on an east-west map. For what it's worth, I don't hear people who are not familiar with the zoo complaining about the map.

Since this thread started I've asked some obviously out of town visitors if they had a problem reading the Detroit map. One guy said it took him a moment to realize that the map was not north south but otherwise people have said they found the map reasonable and easy to follow.
 
I feel like some zoo maps have had serious "downgrades" from previous ones. Here are some examples.
3157e96434675ea24f1a69e1340bd115.jpg
San Antonio - before - Sure the clipart is kind of cheesy, but the map has a good color tone and it is easy to locate the animals.
zoo-map_2020_feb_v1e-page-002.jpg

San Antonio - Now - Overly colorful with very bad color scheme and proportions. What's up with the three elephants when there are one of every other animal?
bc2785e4d5c69aa81a1de39ddccba26d.jpg
National Zoo - before - Nice color tone, easy to understand icons, nicely designed icons, not to cartoonish.
2019-0715-police_health-map_m1-conn-entry-36x37-2018.png
National Zoo - now - We've got neutral navy blue clashing against bright green, purple and orange (Which clashes against itself may I add). The icons are extremely hard to understand (They had to put a key in the back), the animals just represent the attraction, not the animals in the attraction, and the buildings are blocky.
fort-worth-zoo-map.jpg
Fort Worth - before - Number one - The 3D buildings are off yes, but animal icons here are just well done. They look realistic but are surpassingly simplistic, I feel like the icons would work great on this map f362ec225aa7a5635dcc653ada06fdfc.jpg
It has a great color tone and is very realistic, but the silhouettes ruin it.
web_map.png
Fort Worth - now - blocky, boring, silhouettes that are confusing (The Indian rhino could easily be a hippo.) and no way of really knowing where you are with those flat buildings!
806_thumbnail-1024.jpg
Indianapolis - before - yes, silhouettes a bit weird, but the map has a good color scheme (different colors for each zone that don't clash with each other), and is simple, yet had key landmarks like the dome and the dolphin building to help you when you're lost.

IndianapolisZoo_2019Map.jpg
Indianapolis - now - clashing color scheme, flat buildings, blocky enclosures, and of course the silhouettes.

I might do a zoo map upgrade later, but for now I'm done. I don't mean to be harsh to the designers, they're probably better then me, but as a zoo map nerd, I just am not a big fan.
 

Attachments

  • 3157e96434675ea24f1a69e1340bd115.jpg
    3157e96434675ea24f1a69e1340bd115.jpg
    169.6 KB · Views: 49
  • bc2785e4d5c69aa81a1de39ddccba26d.jpg
    bc2785e4d5c69aa81a1de39ddccba26d.jpg
    79.7 KB · Views: 48
  • 2019-0715-police_health-map_m1-conn-entry-36x37-2018.png
    2019-0715-police_health-map_m1-conn-entry-36x37-2018.png
    669.5 KB · Views: 48
  • fort-worth-zoo-map.jpg
    fort-worth-zoo-map.jpg
    105.9 KB · Views: 44
  • f362ec225aa7a5635dcc653ada06fdfc.jpg
    f362ec225aa7a5635dcc653ada06fdfc.jpg
    158.9 KB · Views: 49
  • web_map.png
    web_map.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 49
  • 806_thumbnail-1024.jpg
    806_thumbnail-1024.jpg
    167.8 KB · Views: 47
  • IndianapolisZoo_2019Map.jpg
    IndianapolisZoo_2019Map.jpg
    176.2 KB · Views: 46
Back
Top