ZSL London Zoo ZSL London Zoo News 2019

Like many of us I’d like it to be something more - extension of the outdoor yard into a hoofstock paddock, revamped into a slightly more dynamic macaque enclosure, even just a facelift akin to the tapir enclosure on the far side and a slightly more unusual suid (babirusa would be lovely) but as it stands Visayan warty pigs swapped in place of the dearly departed beardies seems like the most practical solution. As long as something moves in there and it doesn’t end up another empty space I’ll be pleased!
 
Apologies if this post comes across as particularly negative.

I visited last week and sadly have to echo many of the comments from the past year about the zoo feeling tired, neglected and old. I have a fondness for London Zoo as I love the history, but walked around with someone not familiar with the collection and that afforded a different albeit less than positive perspective.

One of the recurring themes was "why is this closed?", and it dawned on me how many of the houses and major exhibits are no longer accessible or have simply been forgotten. There are the obvious ones; The Mappin Terraces, which only looked like the outback for about five minutes, The Aquarium and The Casson Pavilion, but there are many others too; inside the buildings and lower viewing on the Cotton Terraces, the pathway around the side of the Blackburn Pavilion and its northern half (although the accessible area inside is much improved since the renovation), the Round House... and of course it doesn't help that the zoo currently ends at the Middle Gardens and there is no access over the canal other than for school groups.

There are the tired and forgotten areas such as the old Stork and Ostrich House, the exhibits adjacent to the park under what is now the high-level gallery of Tiger Territory, the aviaries opposite the Casson that are no longer accessible and large dead areas that appear to have become a dumping ground for random unwanted items. The less said about crazy golf the better.

With a casual visitor, I also was made aware of how poor some of the exhibits are. The internal monkey enclosures - a throwback to the remaining parts of the Sobell Pavilion - are horrible to look at and must be really problematic from a husbandry standpoint. Similarly, while there's a great collection of nocturnal animals in the Clore Pavilion (Rainforest Life) the gallery area is long past its best, the route through the building is far from inviting and when we visited, there were mice everywhere.

I'm not sure what the answer is... but perhaps part of the problem (other than the obvious and well documented issues with listed buildings) is the way old buildings and existing areas have been just absorbed into new exhibits rather than starting from scratch. For example, I initially liked the idea of Land of Lions and still think it has a lot of merit, but standing back on a grey day and in an empty zoo, it just looks like a total mess. The 'New' lion terraces aren't listed, nor were the big cat terraces, but many of their viewing windows, walls, steps and shelters are now part of Land of Lions, which must've been a challenging jigsaw project for the architects to say the least! Compare this to B.U.G.S, which is an excellent exhibit, even though parts of it are currently closed.
 
The difference is that the area at Chester was previously just a path, grass and shrubs if I remember correctly, so no animals or exhibits were affected.
The area where Treetop Challenge currently is and Conservation Golf before that, was the site of the old cat house and the circular enclosures at its ends.
 
There are the tired and forgotten areas such as the old Stork and Ostrich House, the exhibits adjacent to the park under what is now the high-level gallery of Tiger Territory, the aviaries opposite the Casson that are no longer accessible and large dead areas that appear to have become a dumping ground for random unwanted items. The less said about crazy golf the better.
I think the enclosures adjacent to the park you refer to are what is now the gibbon enclosure - the path to which is also inaccessible for some reason!
 
I'm not sure what the answer is... but perhaps part of the problem (other than the obvious and well documented issues with listed buildings) is the way old buildings and existing areas have been just absorbed into new exhibits rather than starting from scratch. For example, I initially liked the idea of Land of Lions and still think it has a lot of merit, but standing back on a grey day and in an empty zoo, it just looks like a total mess. The 'New' lion terraces aren't listed, nor were the big cat terraces, but many of their viewing windows, walls, steps and shelters are now part of Land of Lions, which must've been a challenging jigsaw project for the architects to say the least! Compare this to B.U.G.S, which is an excellent exhibit, even though parts of it are currently closed.

One of many problems..with plenty more ahead I’m sure. Another is the increasingly “corporate” face that ZSL seems to want to project, with little afterthought towards the longevity of these big, flashy exhibits at London or the Living Collection as a whole.

Mismanagement and a “kicking the can” attitude was the death-knell for the Aquarium and, if it continues, will ultimately be the undoing of the Regents Park site - and sooner than we think I’m sure.
 
Apologies if this post comes across as particularly negative.

I visited last week and sadly have to echo many of the comments from the past year about the zoo feeling tired, neglected and old. I have a fondness for London Zoo as I love the history, but walked around with someone not familiar with the collection and that afforded a different albeit less than positive perspective.

One of the recurring themes was "why is this closed?", and it dawned on me how many of the houses and major exhibits are no longer accessible or have simply been forgotten. There are the obvious ones; The Mappin Terraces, which only looked like the outback for about five minutes, The Aquarium and The Casson Pavilion, but there are many others too; inside the buildings and lower viewing on the Cotton Terraces, the pathway around the side of the Blackburn Pavilion and its northern half (although the accessible area inside is much improved since the renovation), the Round House... and of course it doesn't help that the zoo currently ends at the Middle Gardens and there is no access over the canal other than for school groups.

There are the tired and forgotten areas such as the old Stork and Ostrich House, the exhibits adjacent to the park under what is now the high-level gallery of Tiger Territory, the aviaries opposite the Casson that are no longer accessible and large dead areas that appear to have become a dumping ground for random unwanted items. The less said about crazy golf the better.

With a casual visitor, I also was made aware of how poor some of the exhibits are. The internal monkey enclosures - a throwback to the remaining parts of the Sobell Pavilion - are horrible to look at and must be really problematic from a husbandry standpoint. Similarly, while there's a great collection of nocturnal animals in the Clore Pavilion (Rainforest Life) the gallery area is long past its best, the route through the building is far from inviting and when we visited, there were mice everywhere.

I'm not sure what the answer is... but perhaps part of the problem (other than the obvious and well documented issues with listed buildings) is the way old buildings and existing areas have been just absorbed into new exhibits rather than starting from scratch. For example, I initially liked the idea of Land of Lions and still think it has a lot of merit, but standing back on a grey day and in an empty zoo, it just looks like a total mess. The 'New' lion terraces aren't listed, nor were the big cat terraces, but many of their viewing windows, walls, steps and shelters are now part of Land of Lions, which must've been a challenging jigsaw project for the architects to say the least! Compare this to B.U.G.S, which is an excellent exhibit, even though parts of it are currently closed.

...but, at least they have 'free' drinking water....
 
are there projects in pdf on new aquarium ?
The 'new' aquarium will be a reconstructed area inside B.U.G.S (the invertebrate building). This does not need planning permission, so no plans have to published. I have never been able to find proper plans for B.U.G.S on-line, so I presume that permission was given on the old paper-based system.
 
If you mean the boarding up in Bugs, it is mostly the aquatic displays which are being upgraded to take corals from the now closed aquarium.

This was referring to the insect enclosures in the Clore
 
Back
Top