Yes I know that is what is on the notices but there must be a reason for that .The deer are under veterinary observation so the area probably won’t be open until the veterinary team are happy.
Yes I know that is what is on the notices but there must be a reason for that .The deer are under veterinary observation so the area probably won’t be open until the veterinary team are happy.
My assumption has been fawns/calves being born. It may not be what they've done other years, but maybe they've decided it's a better idea. There's definitely young deer in there.
I don't think just the birth of fawns would close the area, it hasn't previously afaik.
There is, of course, one scenario to consider regarding the Common hippo area:
The zoo deem the Common hippo part of the house, including the outdoor hard standing, redundant, partition it off and use it for storage. The Pygmy hippo side and both indoor on-show pools remain unaffected and operational. Outside, the pools become nothing more than ornamental or used as a rewilding excercise. The zoo then either puts some swanky sheds in the Common hippo paddock, ultimately giving them greater options of what to house there, or nets over the area to create an aviary (similar to the penguin set up)
So when they said there would be a new species it was a flat out lie? Why would they bother, in the past they simply said nothing or that it would be a picnic area. I can't see the point of lying on social media or the zoo website, it really would be too much effort. I get every piece of news is now regarded as a disaster but there's no point in lying at the zoo, it's an utter waste of their time.
I don't think just the birth of fawns would close the area, it hasn't previously afaik. If it was the reason I think they would say so.
There were a few injuries to the Sika deer when I was in there a little while ago, I assumed the stags had been fighting as one was quite cut up so perhaps it had something to do with it. I had assumed PTA was just closed to settle in the Banteng tbh and ensure they didn't dive under cars before the sign went up.
I mean, you'd know about it if a banteng dove under your car
Yes, I completely forgot about the Banteng. That might be the obvious reason, to allow them to settle, see how they react with the deer etc and accustom them to vehicles being driven past them. Likely that is the main reason.There were a few injuries to the Sika deer when I was in there a little while ago, I assumed the stags had been fighting as one was quite cut up so perhaps it had something to do with it. I had assumed PTA was just closed to settle in the Banteng tbh and ensure they didn't dive under cars before the sign went up.
I was up there the day the Banteng were let into the area for the first time and I'm almost certain it was the same day Passage Through Asia closed, therefore I think the under veterinary care is there term for letting the Banteng settle in.Yes, I completely forgot about the Banteng. That might be the obvious reason, to allow them to settle, see how they react with the deer etc and accustom them to vehicles being driven past them. Likely that is the main reason.
And, given the entire site works off of a very archaic plumbing network, the costs involved in creating a high quality exhibit coupled with a filtration system that can manage the output from a group of hippo would be astronomical.
I was thinking duiker might be an option as well, but the one at London has spent the past part of 2 years finding its confidence both with guests and the okapis so that one likely won't move. I certainly wouldn't say no to Whipsnade gaining a slightly more exotic subspecies though - it would certainly fit in very well.This statement made me realise that I'd been operating under the (perhaps mistaken) assumption that Whipsnade intends to bring in a large species to replace the common hippo which will make full use of the existing water areas. As always, the simplest solution is usually the most plausible one - especially where ZSL's notoriously unambitious budget is concerned!
With that in mind, I wonder if the plan is to give the house itself over entirely to pygmy hippo, allowing two complete, adjoining enclosures for a breeding pair (a la London's current pygmy hippo setup), and then add a purely terrestrial species in the outdoor paddock, with the moat acting as just that - a moat.
In which case, I wonder if we could see the duiker move from London to Whipsnade - they would certainly fit with the geographical theming of the area, and would likely benefit from the separation provided by the existing stand-off barriers and moat across the bottom.
All complete speculation, of course - I'm just having fun pondering!![]()
With that in mind, I wonder if the plan is to give the house itself over entirely to pygmy hippo, allowing two complete, adjoining enclosures for a breeding pair (a la London's current pygmy hippo setup), and then add a purely terrestrial species in the outdoor paddock, with the moat acting as just that - a moat.
I was up there the day the Banteng were let into the area for the first time and I'm almost certain it was the same day Passage Through Asia closed, therefore I think the under veterinary care is there term for letting the Banteng settle in.
If they stick with African species aside from Cape or Dwarf Buffalo I can’t think of many that would use the pools properly (even Sitatunga prefer much shallower water no?), so selecting a species like Gelada or Okapis, and leaving the ponds as a moat seems more obvious to me.
My local zoo kept sitatungas for decades and had an end of exhibit pool with shallow and deeper water at the fenceline. The sitatungas just loved it and often stood there or half submerged in it.Sitatunga will swim but possibly only as an escape measure or when crossing deeper water etc. So I don't know how much they would actually use those pools. We are all very interested on here to see what does materialise as the replacement.