cerperal
Well-Known Member
Or maybe there's no conspiracy and in this case the pointless red tape has been removed in a rare act of 'elf and safety not going mad? The logic being those either interacting or in possession of such creatures are trained and knowledgeable and not going to go out of their way to provoke an interaction that causes the human end of the party injury. Interacting with capybaras is safer than interacting with a housecat, let alone a dog, let alone something like a donkey which I am sure you will not be campaigning to be listed as a dangerous animal any time soon. With supervision of keepers, they are more than just safe - they are probably the most docile animals you can encounter.The ones they published at least...
Perhaps these were the zoos which lobbied for the legislation change?
Surely, the species cant suddenly have become domesticated and changed from 'dangerous' to 'pet' in just a couple of generations.
Or - maybe those zoos which do this have just been lucky, so far?
A random example of dangerous animal listings being either misleading or very subjective - plenty of zoos allow visitors to interact directly with tapirs, and all of them allow keepers to be in with them. They are classed as dangerous animals in this country. They have been known to snap people's arms off, and I believe it was only relatively recently at Bristol someone was killed by one. But provided staff and visitors equally are neither complacent nor incompetent, they are hilariously docile. There have been no incidents in the UK as far as I am aware since the one at Bristol. If you fall into a tapir exhibit, it's not going to be death by a thousand trunks. But they are, quite correctly, labelled as dangerous animals.
Any animal is dangerous if not correctly dealt with. But equally, many dangerous animals pose no threat if handled correctly.
Edit: Should have double checked before posting - I'm conflating several events. The original article by Darren Naish I originally read this all on is here (I stupidly searched for it on the Tetzoo site)
Tapir attacks past, present, but hopefully not future
A keeper lost an arm at Oklahoma City zoo while feeding a mother tapir with a calf. A similar incident resulted in a broken arm at a Japanese zoo, and at Bristol a keeper was bitten on the arm through bars while feeding a tapir. The most recent was a 2-year-old bitten during a feeding encounter at Dublin Zoo. All involved calves. Tapirs without calves are still, however, referred to as dangerous animals.
Last edited:
