cerperal
Well-Known Member
I just want to say that this isn't really comparable to Paignton's situation. ZSL are financially in a really good position currently, and have fully recovered from the pandemic and the lows of the mid-2010s. This scheme is to shore up that £2 million buffer that gets tapped into for development costs, but even without that they wouldn't be struggling for money. If anything, ZSL struggle to spend it at the moment out of fear of another pandemic/financial crash/meteor strike on Regent's Park etc. I can't say I blame them for it but it seems wrong to me that the all too often sidelined staff are the ones who have to suffer the consequences
That said, I hope that it still gives a boost to the idea of the government providing support of zoos. It's an insult to our history as a nation that pioneered zoological study, and especially to the societies, that they are left to fend for themselves while seemingly every other attraction gets a boost from the coffers
That said, I hope that it still gives a boost to the idea of the government providing support of zoos. It's an insult to our history as a nation that pioneered zoological study, and especially to the societies, that they are left to fend for themselves while seemingly every other attraction gets a boost from the coffers
Unfortunately it's generally the opposite. The main staff who are at risk are those working in retail and doubled up by volunteers (for example the ones who do the talks). The keepers are only slightly higher on the pecking order because you can just retrain them and they're popular enough to have replacements come in on lower wagesalso I'm guessing these redundancies will be at management level as I'm sure they can't afford to lose keepers