In addition to this the zoo has an African savanna aviary along the Pheasantry which houses their guineafowl and some passerines.Reviewing what the Bronx Zoo has for these categories. Bronx has a great selection for grasslands, but also has a fairly good desert collection (just spread around the zoo).
- In World of Birds there are 2 African savannah exhibits on the first floor. One holds 2 species of bee-eater, while the other holds a wide variety of birds including vulturine guineafowl, weaver bird, and northern red-bishop .
I wouldn't call this a unique exhibit; the species is list is typical of a South American mixed exhibit and the enclosure, while nice, looks similar to dozens of other SA mixed exhibits.The South American Park is one of my favourite areas in the zoo. The way they manage to present together Brazilian Tapir/Giant Anteater/Capybara/Vicugna/ Greater Rhea and Red-legged Seriema both outdoor and indoor is really unique:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I wouldn't call this a unique exhibit; the species is list is typical of a South American mixed exhibit and the enclosure, while nice, looks similar to dozens of other SA mixed exhibits.
In just the Desert category, or in both categories? For the former I'm inclined to agree with you, but for the latter I'd say that "African Plains" at Bronx eclipses it. Vienna's Desert House must be an exhibit that I'd need to go and see before making an impression because judging from the photos it doesn't look that impressive.I'm voting for Vienna, as the Desert House is beyond anything Bronx has to offer
I'd say it counts; I doesn't really fit into the temperate category, it isn't a tropical forest and it's obviously not aquatic. Bronx's exhibit also gives off a Desert-feel for what it'a worth.which I'm not sure Madagascar! at Bronx actually is?
I'd definitely disagree with this comment. For me Bronx easily has the better Giraffe exhibit. To compare, Bronx's exhibit:the giraffes at Bronx are housed in an enclosure that's worse than the one in Vienna.
In just the Desert category, or in both categories? For the former I'm inclined to agree with you, but for the latter I'd say that "African Plains" at Bronx eclipses it. Vienna's Desert House must be an exhibit that I'd need to go and see before making an impression because judging from the photos it doesn't look that impressive.
I'd say it counts; I doesn't really fit into the temperate category, it isn't a tropical forest and it's obviously not aquatic. Bronx's exhibit also gives off a Desert-feel for what it'a worth.
I'd definitely disagree with this comment. For me Bronx easily has the better Giraffe exhibit. To compare, Bronx's exhibit:
![]()
Now Vienna's exhibit:
![]()
There's no contest really imo.
Ah okay, the Giraffe indoors at Bronx is pretty bad, while Vienna's looks quite nice (and has some fabulous architecture!). Outdoors is a clear win for Bronx though and so I think Bronx still has a slight edge in terms of Giraffe accommodation.For the giraffes, I was mostly pointing to the indoor housing. The Carter giraffe building at Bronx is pretty bad, even if the giraffes don't spend months in there. Vienna on the other hand has a modern and sufficiently big indoor house. Compare:
![]()
Depicts about half the space accessible to the giraffes at Bronx
![]()
Depicts about 2 thirds of the space accessible to the giraffes at Vienna, with the rest being through the door on the right.