Zoological inaccuracies & mistakes

A bit of a less troubling book: Jerry Pallota's Extinct Animal Alphabet Book.
upload_2020-12-24_11-27-57.png

I'm a bit nitpicky that they didn't specify which Akioloa, but based on the imagery I'm going with the Kauai Akioloa. Akioloa could actually indicate any species. It seems that it wasn't just one that died of a non-specific 'bird disease' as the book puts it, but a few disappeared like this. As a side note, some think there may be a possibility that the Kauai Akioloa still exists, albeit in fragmented populations.
upload_2020-12-24_11-31-40.png
Whilst Bluebucks were hunted to extinction, I couldn't find anything specifying dog food as being a root cause of hunting.
upload_2020-12-24_11-32-50.png
I couldn't actually find what species of bat the book was referring to. There are some critically endangered bats of Jamaica, but I couldn't find anything about this extinct one.
upload_2020-12-24_11-34-21.png
This I think is actually a half error, because the book seems to be talking about the Norfolk Kaka specific. However, other Kaka species still survive, despite what may be indicated.
*Error Removed, in name of retroactive fairness*
upload_2020-12-24_11-40-59.png
Yes, but which split-jawed snake species? One of them is still extant.
upload_2020-12-24_11-44-16.png
From what I could find, Urogomphus does not refer to a 'giant extinct dragonfly', and is not even a genus name. It seems to refer to 'a paired structure, in the larvae and/or pupae of certain coleopterans, which grows out of the tergum of the last body segment and projects beyond the tip' as Wiktionary puts it.
upload_2020-12-24_11-50-53.png
Vieraella actually lived ~200 million years ago.
*Error removed, as the study was done several decades later*
upload_2020-12-24_11-54-53.png
Again, I'm not sure what exact species Pallotta is referring to.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2020-12-24_11-27-57.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-27-57.png
    74 KB · Views: 65
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-31-40.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-31-40.png
    147.8 KB · Views: 68
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-32-50.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-32-50.png
    108.6 KB · Views: 64
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-34-21.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-34-21.png
    126 KB · Views: 67
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-35-34.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-35-34.png
    127.7 KB · Views: 3
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-40-59.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-40-59.png
    82 KB · Views: 64
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-44-16.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-44-16.png
    146.2 KB · Views: 66
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-50-53.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-50-53.png
    130.7 KB · Views: 70
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-52-47.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-52-47.png
    120.5 KB · Views: 3
  • upload_2020-12-24_11-54-53.png
    upload_2020-12-24_11-54-53.png
    121.9 KB · Views: 65
Last edited:
Hmm. There were two species of Round Island Boa, the arboreal species is still extant, the burrowed believed extinct. Although one meaning of Urogomphus is the appendage, another meaning is as a generic name for Solnhofen fossil dragonflies. I suspect the bee-eater is a reference to oo species, which I could see being originally classified as bee-eaters based on superficial similarity, and the poor joke is just too tempting to include.
 
I think that this is referring to the Vegas Valley Leopard Frog. That said, whilst this was accurate when the book was printed, it has since become inaccurate as of 2011, as DNA taken from Chiricahua Leopard Frogs seems to be identical to the Vegas Valley Leopard Frog DNA, rendering the species still extant.
I don't think it's fair to criticise a book for zoological inaccuracies if the information was correct at the time of printing. In 1927, Lilian Gask wrote the following in 'All about Animals': "In Java and Sumatra there are so many tigers that some years ago Dutch merchants complained that they interfere with the delivery of coffee by lurking along their routes."
 
A bit of a less troubling book: Jerry Pallota's Extinct Animal Alphabet Book.
I'm a bit nitpicky that they didn't specify which Akioloa, but based on the imagery I'm going with the Kauai Akioloa. Akioloa could actually indicate any species.
The book was published in 1993, when the Akioloa were generally treated as being one species with several subspecies, so the book is correct with the then-current taxonomy.

Whilst Bluebucks were hunted to extinction, I couldn't find anything specifying dog food as being a root cause of hunting.
Pretty much any account of the Bluebuck's extinction will say that while the antelope were being hunted for their skins, the meat was fed to dogs because it tasted too bad to be eaten by people.

Yes, but which split-jawed snake species? One of them is still extant.
Here are you seriously asking "Of the two species, which one is extinct? The extinct one or the extant one?"

From what I could find, Urogomphus does not refer to a 'giant extinct dragonfly', and is not even a genus name. It seems to refer to 'a paired structure, in the larvae and/or pupae of certain coleopterans, which grows out of the tergum of the last body segment and projects beyond the tip' as Wiktionary puts it.
As @Tetzoo Quizzer says, Urogomphus is a genus of fossil dragonflies.

Again, I'm not sure what exact species Pallotta is referring to.
This is the only one of your "errors" which is actually an error. The author means "Yellow-tufted Honeyeater", which is an alternative name for the Oahu O'o. He has mistakenly called it "bee eater" and then compounded that mistake with the joke about the letters of the alphabet.
 
What I intended here was that the name given here could be applied to either snake species, they didn't specify if it was the burrowing one or the arboreal one.
Yes, but the fact is one is extinct and one is not, so if their talking about an extinct species it doesn't matter if its the burrowing one or arboreal one.
 
6 incisors in upper jaw
PKg8qVbC86U.jpg

94686563_samaya-bolshaya-obezyana.jpg
 
The logo of the New Zealand Pet & Animal Expo includes an iguana. Iguanas cannot be kept as pets in New Zealand, nor can zoo staff bring them to these events.
Pet Expo.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Pet Expo.jpg
    Pet Expo.jpg
    624.2 KB · Views: 66
I’m still trying to work out what the hell that bird’s meant to be? A Sulfur crested cockatoo that had it’s yellow crest shaved off?
Given how popular the species is in captivity here, I agree that the bird in the logo is most likely to be a poor depiction of a sulphur-crested cockatoo. To be honest, the first thing that I thought it could be is a white rose-ringed parakeet. It could also be an umbrella cockatoo or a corella, I suppose.
 
Back
Top