I know this is an oldish post, but this is just a tiny fraction of the nonsense this book features. Among other things, it lists mousebirds (Coliiformes) as part of the Ciconiiformes!National Geographic Animal Encyclopaedia
View attachment 469414
American Badger labelled as Wolverine
View attachment 469415
Uuhh...






I don't think it's fair to criticise a book for zoological inaccuracies if the information was correct at the time of printing. In 1927, Lilian Gask wrote the following in 'All about Animals': "In Java and Sumatra there are so many tigers that some years ago Dutch merchants complained that they interfere with the delivery of coffee by lurking along their routes."I think that this is referring to the Vegas Valley Leopard Frog. That said, whilst this was accurate when the book was printed, it has since become inaccurate as of 2011, as DNA taken from Chiricahua Leopard Frogs seems to be identical to the Vegas Valley Leopard Frog DNA, rendering the species still extant.
A bit of a less troubling book: Jerry Pallota's Extinct Animal Alphabet Book.
The book was published in 1993, when the Akioloa were generally treated as being one species with several subspecies, so the book is correct with the then-current taxonomy.I'm a bit nitpicky that they didn't specify which Akioloa, but based on the imagery I'm going with the Kauai Akioloa. Akioloa could actually indicate any species.
Pretty much any account of the Bluebuck's extinction will say that while the antelope were being hunted for their skins, the meat was fed to dogs because it tasted too bad to be eaten by people.Whilst Bluebucks were hunted to extinction, I couldn't find anything specifying dog food as being a root cause of hunting.
Here are you seriously asking "Of the two species, which one is extinct? The extinct one or the extant one?"Yes, but which split-jawed snake species? One of them is still extant.
As @Tetzoo Quizzer says, Urogomphus is a genus of fossil dragonflies.From what I could find, Urogomphus does not refer to a 'giant extinct dragonfly', and is not even a genus name. It seems to refer to 'a paired structure, in the larvae and/or pupae of certain coleopterans, which grows out of the tergum of the last body segment and projects beyond the tip' as Wiktionary puts it.
This is the only one of your "errors" which is actually an error. The author means "Yellow-tufted Honeyeater", which is an alternative name for the Oahu O'o. He has mistakenly called it "bee eater" and then compounded that mistake with the joke about the letters of the alphabet.Again, I'm not sure what exact species Pallotta is referring to.
Umm.........Yes, but which split-jawed snake species? One of them is still extant
What I intended here was that the name given here could be applied to either snake species, they didn't specify if it was the burrowing one or the arboreal one.Yes, but which split-jawed snake species? One of them is still extant.
Yes, but the fact is one is extinct and one is not, so if their talking about an extinct species it doesn't matter if its the burrowing one or arboreal one.What I intended here was that the name given here could be applied to either snake species, they didn't specify if it was the burrowing one or the arboreal one.
The logo of the New Zealand Pet & Animal Expo includes an iguana. Iguanas cannot be kept as pets in New Zealand, nor can zoo staff bring them to these events.
View attachment 471677
Given how popular the species is in captivity here, I agree that the bird in the logo is most likely to be a poor depiction of a sulphur-crested cockatoo. To be honest, the first thing that I thought it could be is a white rose-ringed parakeet. It could also be an umbrella cockatoo or a corella, I suppose.I’m still trying to work out what the hell that bird’s meant to be? A Sulfur crested cockatoo that had it’s yellow crest shaved off?