For anyone considering a visit to Minnesota Zoo, having been several times in both seasons I can confidently say that visiting in winter is better. Less crowds, the only animals you miss are domestics, and the animals are a lot more active.
I'm very pleased Minnesota was able to make your listMinnesota - Minnesota Zoo
Founded: 1978
Size: 485 Acres (196 Hectares)
Species & Subspecies (On and Off Exhibit): 522
Mammals 63
Birds 112
Reptiles & Amphibians 41
Fish 240
Invertebrates 66
Being one of the northernmost major zoos in the country may limit collection diversity, but if done correctly can be extremely beneficial for exhibit design. With a large rainforest house as an exception, the zoo specializes in animals that can be outdoors year-round in a northern climate and lack many ABC species like elephants, giraffes, rhinos, lions, hippos, and great apes as a result. The enormous entrance building connects all of the indoor attractions under one roof to prevent guests from having to traverse the outdoor loop during a frigid Minnesota winter. Discovery Bay is the zoo's aquarium that’s slightly underwhelming, although Hawaiian monk seals were a neat addition, but now the zoo is down to its last individual, so the future of that habitat is up in the air. The outdoor trails are where the zoo truly reaches its apex. Minnesota Trail has an excellent collection of North American wildlife. Wolverine and fisher are particularly neat highlights alongside an excellent black bear habitat. The main series of outdoor habitats are vast fields and rolling hillsides for ungulates, but no African savannah here. Instead, multi-acre paddocks for bison, moose, takin, caribou and other northern species. The pair of tiger exhibits are absolutely gigantic and can be argued to be the best of their kind on the continent, and nearby is a stunning forest habitat for dholes. An unshowy and easy to miss cabin for native mussel species is a real gem as well. The zoo's most impressive attraction however is Russia’s Grizzly Coast, a spectacular complex themed around the Kamchatka Peninsula with grizzly bears, amur leopards, sea otters and wild boar. It’s a brilliantly designed series of habitats with some fascinating species, incredible detail, and it shows just successful a zoo keeping only cold tolerant species can be.
![]()
Grizzly Bear Exhibit, @Ding Lingwei
![]()
Sichuan Takin Exhibit, @Milwaukee Man
![]()
Tropical Reef Tank, @snowleopard
![]()
American Black Bear Exhibit, @pachyderm pro
Smaller Amur Tiger Exhibit, @pachyderm pro![]()
Zoochat Gallery:
Minnesota Zoo - ZooChat
Zoo Website:
Home - Minnesota Zoo
Zoo Map:
https://mnzoo.org/pdfs/MNZooMap2021.pdf
I know we are a little farther down the alphabet than when it would have come up, but I'm a little surprised that Audubon Zoo in New Orleans wasn't on here. I understand why it might not be that high on the list, as there perhaps aren't as many rarities as other zoos, but in my opinion, I thought a lot of the newer exhibits were fairly top notch. Including those with the very old historical buildings on the site, I found it very much worth the time to visit it.
Wow, New England Aquarium got shafted! With that, practically all of New England is out of the running at this point, except maybe for the Roger Williams Zoo.
Thanks, I think? You may have the wrong must-see thread.Great thread @lintworm I am really appreciate these posts. Keep up the good work! If you don't mind me mentioning this, so far I have personally visited 19 of the 25 facilities presented here.
Thanks, I think? You may have the wrong must-see thread.![]()
Good summary of the current state of the Minnesota Zoo. I do think it's likely to begin a little run of improvements soon, starting with the treetop trail on the old monorail track, after lacking significant renovations or additions since 2015 or so.I'm very pleased Minnesota was able to make your list. Even though the zoo has slightly decreased in quality, ambition, and number of species over the years, I would still rank it as the fifth or sixth best zoo I've visited so far. What it lacks in ABC species and collection diversity, it makes up for with excellent outdoor Exhibitry for the species they have. The Northern Trail has some of the best stand-alone Ungulate enclosures I've seen in a major zoo, coupled with two of the country's best Tiger exhibits. The Minnesota Trail is a solid set of habitats for a nice lineup of native species, and Russia's Grizzly coast is one of the best zoo exhibits on the continent. Although I may have my gripes with the zoo's current state, I would highly suggest you pay a visit to the Minnesota Zoo if you have the means to do so.
Judging by what states are left, I think there are an obvious 20 choices for inclusion in this thread. However, I'm honestly not sure at all what other facilities might make the list in the final five slots. Will be very interesting interesting see!We’ve now reached the halfway point of this thread. So far there’s been traditional zoos, aquariums, theme parks, specialist facilities and everything in between. It happens to work out that the next few consecutive picks will all be juggernauts of the zoo world, lauded as some of the best of the best: Saint Louis, Omaha and Bronx.
Is this because of the pandemic? Last time I checked their prices was in 2020 and they were still $100 a person. Do you think they will lower them after the pandemic is over???I just double checked my e-mail about their pricing, from November. It's $500, not $400. $100 for each additional person over 5.
The facility most similar to White Oak, in terms of species list, exhibit size and type, breeding record, etc is Fossil Rim. They're $25 for self guided tour, $40 for guided. They have a private tour that's also $500, for up to 10 people.
Is this because of the pandemic? Last time I checked their prices was in 2020 and they were still $100 a person. Do you think they will lower them after the pandemic is over???
I just double checked my e-mail about their pricing, from November. It's $500, not $400. $100 for each additional person over 5.
I could be wrong about this of course, but from TinoPup's quote I take it as being that it is $100 per person - but with a minimum of five people (i.e. $500, then $100 for each additional person over five, as in the quote).Is this because of the pandemic? Last time I checked their prices was in 2020 and they were still $100 a person. Do you think they will lower them after the pandemic is over???
So they're only catering to the wealthy now???? They should make a cheap *only* elephant tour option since I can see all those other species at other facilities. Would like to see that huge herd once they finish bringing them all there. Maybe that extra $400 is the elephant upkeep money????No idea why they were raised but I don't think they'll be lowered, since those prices are from only a few months ago.
Well, they don't have prices visible on their site anymore so.....I could be wrong about this of course, but from TinoPup's quote I take it as being that it is $100 per person - but with a minimum of five people (i.e. $500, then $100 for each additional person over five, as in the quote).
Generally places which have minimum numbers will do tours for fewer people, but they need to pay the full group price (of five people in this case).