All of this nonsense is coming from the state-owned Chinese papers that should not be called "news"papers. They're equivalent to the tabloids that say celebrities have been taken by aliens. If there was actual abuse, China would have demanded the animals back, or at the least sent over their own zoologists to check on them. This BS requires Memphis actively abusing - not just neglecting - their animals for a long time, but then also faking data and images to send to the researchers in China who monitored the daily information.
Does that seem like something Memphis would do? With how popular pandas are, and how rare they are in the USA, does it seem logical that the few that got to work with them would actively do these things? Or that no one would whistleblow about it?
Think about what you read and where it's coming from. Don't support these anti-zoo lies.
Does that seem like something Memphis would do? With how popular pandas are, and how rare they are in the USA, does it seem logical that the few that got to work with them would actively do these things? Or that no one would whistleblow about it?
Think about what you read and where it's coming from. Don't support these anti-zoo lies.