Hi fellow esteemed forumsters,
Well, here it is then ... my kick-off ... for the ethic and philosophy debate surrounding the entire Australian elephant breeding programme. Whereas this discussion started more or less around Taronga Zoo elephant exhibit, I assume that it has a much wider scope in that it concerns the entire Australian elephant breeding programme as a going concern.
As for Taronga Zoo - personally - I do find that some of the criticism levelled at the zoo, its exhibit and the long-term prospects remains unjustified and based more on personal opinion and outlook on the world than any (non-)professional expertise or in-depth knowledge vis a vis the Taronga elephant exhibit, its keeper care and animal management.
I am no lay-person and I have personally followed the fiery debate in Australia vis a vis the Thailand elephant import with much interest and sometimes outright surprise. That debate had been heavily politicised, it being an understatement of the vehemence and sometimes fanatical criticism levelled at all zoos involved in the elephant import, not just the Taronga Zoo.
I found quite a few of the concerns that had been brought up in the past objecting to any elephant imports into Australia/New Zealand had more to do with a general anthropomorphised and romanticised idealism vis a vis the Asiatic elephant as a species (more worthy than others). It seems to me, those seem notions still exist today among some of our zoo forumsters. I feel unjustiably so, but hell we may and can disagree (and most probably we will never agree, but that is just the human condition

).
I am afraid the romantic notion of wild elephants in the wild expanses of their natural habitat is a thing of the past. Eco-tourism in itself is in no way effective to combat the continuous decline in natural elephant populations (if not a whole set of criteria are met at the local level to promote in situ conservation and local participation and ownership) nor is the frequently suggested native sanctuary mode any conservation added benefit or generates funding for in situ conservation.
I can and will elaborate later, but would first invite others to do their bit.
You are all welcome to it here!
Kindest regards,
K.B.