A Zoo Man's Notebook, 2025

Compared to the lizards and snakes I’ve worked with, many of the turtles and tortoises that I’ve worked with over the years kind of blend together. Not so much as species, but as individuals – apart from maybe some of the bigger tortoises, I have a hard time remembering many individual chelonians from my career. There is, however, one exception – it helped that she was the only member of her species that I ever worked with, but even I’d worked with 100 of them, I’m pretty sure I’d always remember the Nile softshell that (for purposes of this post) I’ll call Jabba.

Mixing chelonians and crocodilians is a fairly classic combo in zoo exhibits – at the time I started working at the zoo, our crocodile pool already had about a dozen smaller turtles. Everyone seemed to get along well enough – the crocodiles ignored the turtles, the turtles ignored the crocodiles. That peace was shattered when Jabba came along. She was donated by a member of the public, and I really wish I could have seen her in her former home. Mostly, I wanted to know who – and why – and where and how – someone was keeping a voracious aquatic turtle the circumference of a car tire. Jabba was enormous, an giant green, rubbery pancake with feet and a head.

I'm really frustrated with myself that I don't have any pictures of her - this was about 20 years ago, before everyone had cell cameras, and the enclosure - with the poor lighting and the constant fogginess - made taking pics with a regular camera difficult. You'll just have to take my word for it, she was a sight to behold. I've only very rarely seen another member of her species, and none that matched her massive girth.

I got to test Jabba's size myself shortly after her arrival at the zoo. After clearing her mandatory quarantine in the Hospital, Jabba was being carried to her new exhibit in a bathtub carried by another keeper and myself. The last step to getting her into the exhibit was to carry her up the rickety wooden stairs that led to the service door - I, foolishly, offered to go first. About half way up, Jabba decided that she wanted out. The next thing that I knew, I had an enormous turtle climbing onto my shoulder, clawed feet scrambling to find a foothold in my back. Not finding any, she began to try and make some, with painful success. Her weight was almost unbearable as it throbbed up and down my spine, while my colleague in the rear, unable to do anything for fear of dropping the tub, did what I would have probably done in the same situation. He froze - and then laughed.

When we finally got Jabba settled into the crocodile exhibit, it took her little time to establish her dominance. She had no fear of her larger exhibit mates. If anything, they came to fear her. Driven by an overwhelming hunger, she let nothing stand between her stomach and that which could fill it. The crocodile feedings soon became much more daunting, and through no fault of the crocodiles. Jabba would belligerently charge into their midst and take what she considered her due, regardless of our having fed her before. Things could get dicey.

On one occasion that I fed them early on in Jabba's residence, the male crocodile swam up to the shoreline and opened his jaws, patiently waiting for a rat to be deposited as was his custom. Suddenly, there was a flash of bluish-green, as Jabba rammed her flabby neck into his open jaws and snatched the skinned rodent from his very mouth, basically sticking her head down his throat. Crocodilians are thought to have quite a poker face, being fairly fixed of facial features. Nevertheless, in that moment I swear that I saw shock, disgust, and outrage in equal parts on the face of the male crocodile. This was to be typical of Jabba's feeding frenzies.

The turtle was almost suicidal in her hunger. The situation could very well have ended life right then and there, had the horrified croc decided to chomp down anyway. I certainly wouldn’t have blamed him. The tiny nicks that would eventually appear periodically along Jabba's soft shell indicated that the crocs weren’t always so tolerant.

Unfortunately, Jabba's appetites weren't satisfied by fish and rodents. When the female crocodile began to build a nest and lay eggs, it took Jabba very little time to plow into the mound of vegetation and start feasting on the eggs. That was the last straw. We pulled her from the exhibit but, like her former owner, found a giant aquatic turtle wasn’t the easiest animal to house – at least not if you have any considerations for her welfare, which is pretty poor if you’re a big turtle in a metal cattle trough. Every once in a while, someone would relent and put her back in the croc exhibit, convinced that this time, things would be better. Spoiler: they never got better. Jabba continued to be a holy terror. She was promptly placed on the surplus list and banished to another zoo. She lived out her life happily there, perhaps achieving something close to a sated appetite. I must say, I'm pretty sure our crocodiles were much happier too.

Years later, at another zoo, I had a spiny softshell in my section - much smaller animal, of course. Still, there was something about that animal that left me very unsettled. Perhaps it was that she was essentially just a tiny version of Jabba, and, looking at her cool, appraising stare through the glass of her tank, I suspected that, if she was large enough, she would happily have tried to eat me as well.

View attachment 790259
A while ago I happened to see a cartoon called "The Amazing World of Gumball" and an episode or two showed the main characters accidentally buying a Trionyx which acted as an antagonist for a while. Wonder if any of the creators had prior experience with the species as well.
 
Today, here’s the story of two closely-related antelopes that I worked with at one non-AZA facility. The species shared an enclosure, with identical diet and care protocols. One species thrived. The other did not.

Among other species, some of which we’ve already discussed her – bison and zebra, addax and ostrich – the main field exhibit at the zoo was home to a herd of one male, three female common eland. The eland did very well in the exhibit, which was several acres in size of grassy, rolling hills, with a thin strip of woodland hugging one edge of the perimeter fence. Besides grazing opportunities, they were given ad lib hay, as well as grain fed in troughs each afternoon. Much of their diet came from grain (of the same type that they were fed in the troughs) offered by visitors on wagon tours; on busy days, they might have eaten all of their daily ration from wagons. The elands were very personable and approached almost every wagon tour I ever drove, where I must admit they were very well-behaved animals, fairly gentle with kids despite their imposing size. (The bull was only with us for a relatively short amount of time – he was brought in to breed the females, and then was moved out).

upload_2025-5-5_11-48-31.png
A picture I've shared before, but here are our elands spooking (unintentionally) a zebra, a fallow deer, and an addax away from the troughs

In my experience, the common eland is one of the most docile of antelopes – perhaps its large size allows it to feel less-flighty and more confident than many smaller species, but I’m not sure if size is everything – sable are pretty big antelope, and they terrify me, as much as I love them. I don’t think I ever saw them in conflict with another species. Their placid nature has led them to be a semi-domestic species in parts of the world (including Eastern Europe – so it may not surprise anyone when I saw that our elands were also very cold-hardy). When I did field work in Africa in college, the most persistent nuisance I had to deal with were the half-tamed elands that were the pet project of the owner of the game ranch where I was doing my research. I’d be making observations, feel breath on the nape of my neck, and turn around to find myself eye to eye with one of his big, dumb, loveable pets, six inches behind me. This happened all… the… time. It’s hard to be stealthy stalking through the bush when you have a 2000-pound ox-puppy at your heels wherever you go. I digress.

The eland may not have been the brightest, but they were excellent mothers, and not long after the male moseyed off to another zoo, each of the three dropped a calf. The calves were semi-hidden for the first few days (I mean, as best as you can hide in a field), but were soon following the moms up to the wagons, or soliciting treats from us while we cleaned the yard.

It was perhaps the success of our eland herd that led the owner of the zoo to bring in the bongo. Ozzy was a young male, still filling out his frame, when he was brought to us. He was a very shy, lovable, somewhat doofy animal, who, despite our best efforts, clung to the forested rim of the yard, and seldom ventured out into the open. The enclosure was, again, many acres in size, but as far as Ozzy was concerned, it might have just been that thin, shaded strip of woodland. The only animals I ever saw him in an proximity to were the various species of deer, which also preferred the wooded area (but not as exclusively as he did), and they never seemed to interact. It was just as well that I always knew where to find Ozzy, because I was constantly wanting to check up on him. I came to worry about him a lot.

I’d seen big, beautiful bull bongos at other zoos, and looked forward to watching Ozzy as he grew up into a gorgeous beast – but we never quite got there. The problem seemed to be that he wouldn’t eat. Ozzy would’ve starved to death if he was forced to rely on the wagons – he would never have dreamed of approaching them. And even if he would’ve, he was so intimidated by the other animals that I doubt he would’ve gotten a mouthful. For that reason, he wouldn’t go to the troughs, either. Feeding him off by his lonesome in the woods was also a challenge – if we tried doing that, we ran the risk of luring all of the other animals into his sylvan retreat, stressing him out more. Permission to build a separate pen for him was denied.

upload_2025-5-5_11-47-54.png

So, I would often wait until all of the other animals – especially the dominant species in the exhibit, the camels and Watusi – were distracted with wagon feedings being led by someone else, and then I’d sneak over to Ozzy and give him small meals throughout the day. Not just grain, but produce (he loved banana) as well, which I knew I’d get in trouble for if found out – we always had limited produce, and if we were ordered to only give the monkeys one piece a day, I can’t imagine how the boss would have felt about “wasting” fruit and vegetables on a grain eater.

As shy as Ozzy was with the wagons and the public, he was especially affectionate towards us, especially me, who he recognized as the bringer of treats. While he would eat, I’d often give him a vigorous rub down, which would usually leave my hands stained red from the natural pigments in his coat. Of course, those rubdowns also allowed me to access his body condition much more accurately than I could the other antelope in the paddock – which led to me realize how, despite my best feeding efforts, he was really quite thin and bony.

We didn’t have a vet on staff, and were expected to solve and diagnose most things in house. One of the few things we could do was run fecal tests for parasites (this is something I’ve never been good at – for all of my efforts in school, I’m awful with microscopes). It turned out Ozzy had a very high parasite load. The decision was made to send him back to the facility where he came from, a decision I suspect he appreciated, as he seemed to improve markedly when he went back (I’m afraid our reputation – especially our lead hoofstock person – took a hit because of Ozzy. When he was unloaded back at his old zoo, his caretakers there were furious about how raggedy he looked. “What did they do to our baby?!?” was the reaction, I was told).

This really helped hammer home to me the lesson that two species can be very closely related (elands have been used as a surrogate for bongo pregnancy before), but taxonomy isn’t everything. The little differences in species behavior and biology can have tremendous implications for how the species should be managed in zoos. It was a lesson that would be really reinforced down the road with the experience I had with cassowary.

To end on a happier bongo story, I was working in a non-hoofstock role at another zoo, one which had a large herd of bongos. One of the cows was expecting, and was confined to the quarantine building for birthing, with 24/7 watch (I’m not sure why). In the room next to the bongos were some birds that I was taking care of. One day, I was walking into quarantine to check on the birds and was walking past the bongo room, when I saw the keeper was watching them step out to go to the bathroom. As I passed the bongos, I glanced in and saw a calf being nuzzled by the mother. I turned around and called to the keeper, who was only a few yards away, “Oh, I didn’t know she’d given birth. Congratulations!”

The keeper whirled around, shocked. She’d been watching the bongo like a hawk for hours, only for it to drop the calf literally seconds after she left the room. So perhaps the saying about a watched pot never boiling should be a watched bongo never delivers.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-5_11-47-54.png
    upload_2025-5-5_11-47-54.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 169
  • upload_2025-5-5_11-48-31.png
    upload_2025-5-5_11-48-31.png
    925.2 KB · Views: 179
Today, here’s the story of two closely-related antelopes that I worked with at one non-AZA facility. The species shared an enclosure, with identical diet and care protocols. One species thrived. The other did not.

Among other species, some of which we’ve already discussed her – bison and zebra, addax and ostrich – the main field exhibit at the zoo was home to a herd of one male, three female common eland. The eland did very well in the exhibit, which was several acres in size of grassy, rolling hills, with a thin strip of woodland hugging one edge of the perimeter fence. Besides grazing opportunities, they were given ad lib hay, as well as grain fed in troughs each afternoon. Much of their diet came from grain (of the same type that they were fed in the troughs) offered by visitors on wagon tours; on busy days, they might have eaten all of their daily ration from wagons. The elands were very personable and approached almost every wagon tour I ever drove, where I must admit they were very well-behaved animals, fairly gentle with kids despite their imposing size. (The bull was only with us for a relatively short amount of time – he was brought in to breed the females, and then was moved out).

View attachment 791081
A picture I've shared before, but here are our elands spooking (unintentionally) a zebra, a fallow deer, and an addax away from the troughs

In my experience, the common eland is one of the most docile of antelopes – perhaps its large size allows it to feel less-flighty and more confident than many smaller species, but I’m not sure if size is everything – sable are pretty big antelope, and they terrify me, as much as I love them. I don’t think I ever saw them in conflict with another species. Their placid nature has led them to be a semi-domestic species in parts of the world (including Eastern Europe – so it may not surprise anyone when I saw that our elands were also very cold-hardy). When I did field work in Africa in college, the most persistent nuisance I had to deal with were the half-tamed elands that were the pet project of the owner of the game ranch where I was doing my research. I’d be making observations, feel breath on the nape of my neck, and turn around to find myself eye to eye with one of his big, dumb, loveable pets, six inches behind me. This happened all… the… time. It’s hard to be stealthy stalking through the bush when you have a 2000-pound ox-puppy at your heels wherever you go. I digress.

The eland may not have been the brightest, but they were excellent mothers, and not long after the male moseyed off to another zoo, each of the three dropped a calf. The calves were semi-hidden for the first few days (I mean, as best as you can hide in a field), but were soon following the moms up to the wagons, or soliciting treats from us while we cleaned the yard.

It was perhaps the success of our eland herd that led the owner of the zoo to bring in the bongo. Ozzy was a young male, still filling out his frame, when he was brought to us. He was a very shy, lovable, somewhat doofy animal, who, despite our best efforts, clung to the forested rim of the yard, and seldom ventured out into the open. The enclosure was, again, many acres in size, but as far as Ozzy was concerned, it might have just been that thin, shaded strip of woodland. The only animals I ever saw him in an proximity to were the various species of deer, which also preferred the wooded area (but not as exclusively as he did), and they never seemed to interact. It was just as well that I always knew where to find Ozzy, because I was constantly wanting to check up on him. I came to worry about him a lot.

I’d seen big, beautiful bull bongos at other zoos, and looked forward to watching Ozzy as he grew up into a gorgeous beast – but we never quite got there. The problem seemed to be that he wouldn’t eat. Ozzy would’ve starved to death if he was forced to rely on the wagons – he would never have dreamed of approaching them. And even if he would’ve, he was so intimidated by the other animals that I doubt he would’ve gotten a mouthful. For that reason, he wouldn’t go to the troughs, either. Feeding him off by his lonesome in the woods was also a challenge – if we tried doing that, we ran the risk of luring all of the other animals into his sylvan retreat, stressing him out more. Permission to build a separate pen for him was denied.

View attachment 791080

So, I would often wait until all of the other animals – especially the dominant species in the exhibit, the camels and Watusi – were distracted with wagon feedings being led by someone else, and then I’d sneak over to Ozzy and give him small meals throughout the day. Not just grain, but produce (he loved banana) as well, which I knew I’d get in trouble for if found out – we always had limited produce, and if we were ordered to only give the monkeys one piece a day, I can’t imagine how the boss would have felt about “wasting” fruit and vegetables on a grain eater.

As shy as Ozzy was with the wagons and the public, he was especially affectionate towards us, especially me, who he recognized as the bringer of treats. While he would eat, I’d often give him a vigorous rub down, which would usually leave my hands stained red from the natural pigments in his coat. Of course, those rubdowns also allowed me to access his body condition much more accurately than I could the other antelope in the paddock – which led to me realize how, despite my best feeding efforts, he was really quite thin and bony.

We didn’t have a vet on staff, and were expected to solve and diagnose most things in house. One of the few things we could do was run fecal tests for parasites (this is something I’ve never been good at – for all of my efforts in school, I’m awful with microscopes). It turned out Ozzy had a very high parasite load. The decision was made to send him back to the facility where he came from, a decision I suspect he appreciated, as he seemed to improve markedly when he went back (I’m afraid our reputation – especially our lead hoofstock person – took a hit because of Ozzy. When he was unloaded back at his old zoo, his caretakers there were furious about how raggedy he looked. “What did they do to our baby?!?” was the reaction, I was told).

This really helped hammer home to me the lesson that two species can be very closely related (elands have been used as a surrogate for bongo pregnancy before), but taxonomy isn’t everything. The little differences in species behavior and biology can have tremendous implications for how the species should be managed in zoos. It was a lesson that would be really reinforced down the road with the experience I had with cassowary.

To end on a happier bongo story, I was working in a non-hoofstock role at another zoo, one which had a large herd of bongos. One of the cows was expecting, and was confined to the quarantine building for birthing, with 24/7 watch (I’m not sure why). In the room next to the bongos were some birds that I was taking care of. One day, I was walking into quarantine to check on the birds and was walking past the bongo room, when I saw the keeper was watching them step out to go to the bathroom. As I passed the bongos, I glanced in and saw a calf being nuzzled by the mother. I turned around and called to the keeper, who was only a few yards away, “Oh, I didn’t know she’d given birth. Congratulations!”

The keeper whirled around, shocked. She’d been watching the bongo like a hawk for hours, only for it to drop the calf literally seconds after she left the room. So perhaps the saying about a watched pot never boiling should be a watched bongo never delivers.
Common eland and bongo are two species that I have quite a lot of experience with! Bongo, in particular, I have actually worked with my entire career as a full-time keeper (!), and they are one of my absolute favorite species to work with.

Common eland are definitely some of the easiest to manage of the antelope species. They are very hardy, generally quite calm, mix well with other species, and have a no-fuss diet. It is no wonder they are such staples of mixed-species savannas and drive-through safaris, as managing them is really no different than managing beef cattle (also speaking from experience :p).

Bongo are interesting because, in my experience, bongo are much more tractable and easy-going than even common eland are (nearly all of the bongo I have worked with have been comfortable hand-feeding and readily seek out tactile engagement from keepers and are quite easy to train for voluntary medical procedures), but they are much more skittish when it comes to other external stimuli and are quick to flee. While they are absolutely beautiful, they often do not make for the best exhibit animals because of their reclusive nature, like you have described with the male you worked with. They are largely nocturnal, and they are more than content to spend their days tucked away in the farthest, darkest reaches of their exhibits until feeding time or dusk. They often require quite specific diets, compared to the generalist common eland. They are prone to copper deficiencies and high parasite loads (as you also experienced!), and are obligate browsers that can experience gastrointestinal problems without appropriate amounts of browse and alfalfa in their diet.
 
Earlier in this thread, I’ve described my experiences with the Cape porcupine. Today, I’ll talk about their tree-climbing cousin, the prehensile-tailed porcupine (PTP in keeper shorthand). I’ve worked with this species at two AZA zoos and one non-AZA zoo… not one of which had their porcupines on display. While I have seen this species in zoo exhibits before, it is most commonly kept as an ambassador, which is the role that I worked with this species in.

In their wild state, this species is nocturnal, but like many nocturnal mammals in zoos, they tend to adjust their activity schedules under human care and become more diurnal. That being said, the two AZA zoos I worked at had the same rule for the porcupines and other nocturnal ambassadors. If they are asleep, let them sleep. If they are awake when you go to service them, then you can interact/train/etc. It’s part of a broader effort to give the animals more control over their routines. That said, PTPs have tended to strike me as a bit duller, sleepier, and more sluggish than other porcupines, especially Hystrix. Even North American porcupines have typically impressed me as being a bit more active and purposeful in their movements.

upload_2025-5-6_15-35-32.png
A prehensile-tailed porcupine in modular caging behind the scenes

Housing for the species was always fairly limited and basic. At the non-AZA zoo, it was a stall of Corners Unlimited caging in the back of the reptile house, with a few perches. At one AZA zoo, it was an outdoor pen in the mews for education birds of prey. At the other AZA zoo, it was indoor CU caging, along with an outdoor exercise pen that the animal shared on a rotational basis with other species of ambassador animals. The two AZA animals were each lone males, while the non-AZA zoo held a pair. What interested me the most about the housing situation across the zoo was that the animal that was housed primarily outdoors seemed surprisingly uncomfortable in warmer weather – and this was a fairly temperate part of the country, though it could get kind of muggy in the summer. He also showed some allergic reactions to heavy pollen. During the winter, his enclosure was sealed off and heated, though when the weather turned very cold, we always made sure that we identified a potential indoor holding space for him in case things went bad – never trust heat lamps with your animal’s life, they will inevitably fail when you need them the most.

Diet was rodent block, supplemented with lots of produce. Nuts are also enjoyed, and as with other rodents, it’s always good to give them something hard to work their teeth on (though they strike me as a lot less chewy-crazy than many other rodents). Porcupines are some of the most enjoyable animals to feed, mostly because of the very delighted little grunts that they make when eating, which make them sound as if they are in pure ecstasy (I’ve often thought that a person listening to, but not seeing, a porcupine at its breakfast might assume that the animal is up to something else).

Unlike Cape porcupines, I’ve never seen an aggressive interaction between a PTP and a keeper. In fact, I’ve found them to be some of the sweetest, most interactive of animals. The first AZA porcupine that I worked with delighted in climbing up your leg, then your back, then your shoulder, until he was finally sitting atop your head. Then, he would stand on his back legs and sway, waving his front limbs in the air – when I would see him do it to other keepers, it reminded me of King Kong on top of the Empire State Building, beating his chest. When he was doing it to you, you were probably more preoccupied with the smell than the optics – these guys have a pungent aroma, which many people find unpleasant. The nose can only be described as unbelievably boopable.

upload_2025-5-6_15-36-16.png
A young male PTP coming in for the nose boop (very soft and spongy)

Like binturongs, the porcupine’s namesake tail makes a handy leash. The quills of this species are fairly small (compared to the pencil-sized spikes of Hystrix) and rarely seem to be erected. It can actually be fairly easy to forget that they’re there. The only time I ever saw them come into play was with one specimen who was in very poor health, and actually dying. The vet tech who was handling him wore a thick sweatshirt and gloves as she frequently turned him around, trying to medicate him and administer fluid – both garments were filled with short little quills by the time the session was over.

PTPs represent a challenge that was becoming apparent for many species in zoo management about 10 years ago. There are some species that are very sought after as ambassador animals, which have traditionally been hand reared and housed alone – binturong, Patagonian cavy, and the various armadillos have also been in this grouping. You’d read a Breeding and Transfer Plan, and while the population looked like it was in good shape at a glance, you’d soon start looking at the individual animals and see a surprisingly large number were listed as excluded as ambassadors. As a result, there was a heavy demand for animals, and yet no one was breeding them, so the numbers were falling. Realizing this, some of the SSPs and TAGs began to rethink how ambassador animal programs should work. There became a stronger desire to have animals that could multifunction as ambassadors AND breeders AND, in some cases, exhibit animals as well, with priority for placement given to zoos that would commit to trying to breed their animals.

Not only does this boost sustainability of populations, but it helps provide better quality of life for ambassador animals, many of which traditionally were kept in less-exciting housing and without as much conspecific socialization as exhibit animals of the same species. It may still be too early to tell how much these changes have moved the needle on efforts to conserve these species, but it was a positive step towards realizing that trying the same old management strategies weren’t going to improve the dynamics of these populations.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-6_15-35-32.png
    upload_2025-5-6_15-35-32.png
    576.9 KB · Views: 158
  • upload_2025-5-6_15-36-16.png
    upload_2025-5-6_15-36-16.png
    1,007.3 KB · Views: 179
Earlier in this thread, I’ve described my experiences with the Cape porcupine. Today, I’ll talk about their tree-climbing cousin, the prehensile-tailed porcupine (PTP in keeper shorthand). I’ve worked with this species at two AZA zoos and one non-AZA zoo… not one of which had their porcupines on display. While I have seen this species in zoo exhibits before, it is most commonly kept as an ambassador, which is the role that I worked with this species in.

In their wild state, this species is nocturnal, but like many nocturnal mammals in zoos, they tend to adjust their activity schedules under human care and become more diurnal. That being said, the two AZA zoos I worked at had the same rule for the porcupines and other nocturnal ambassadors. If they are asleep, let them sleep. If they are awake when you go to service them, then you can interact/train/etc. It’s part of a broader effort to give the animals more control over their routines. That said, PTPs have tended to strike me as a bit duller, sleepier, and more sluggish than other porcupines, especially Hystrix. Even North American porcupines have typically impressed me as being a bit more active and purposeful in their movements.

View attachment 791356
A prehensile-tailed porcupine in modular caging behind the scenes

Housing for the species was always fairly limited and basic. At the non-AZA zoo, it was a stall of Corners Unlimited caging in the back of the reptile house, with a few perches. At one AZA zoo, it was an outdoor pen in the mews for education birds of prey. At the other AZA zoo, it was indoor CU caging, along with an outdoor exercise pen that the animal shared on a rotational basis with other species of ambassador animals. The two AZA animals were each lone males, while the non-AZA zoo held a pair. What interested me the most about the housing situation across the zoo was that the animal that was housed primarily outdoors seemed surprisingly uncomfortable in warmer weather – and this was a fairly temperate part of the country, though it could get kind of muggy in the summer. He also showed some allergic reactions to heavy pollen. During the winter, his enclosure was sealed off and heated, though when the weather turned very cold, we always made sure that we identified a potential indoor holding space for him in case things went bad – never trust heat lamps with your animal’s life, they will inevitably fail when you need them the most.

Diet was rodent block, supplemented with lots of produce. Nuts are also enjoyed, and as with other rodents, it’s always good to give them something hard to work their teeth on (though they strike me as a lot less chewy-crazy than many other rodents). Porcupines are some of the most enjoyable animals to feed, mostly because of the very delighted little grunts that they make when eating, which make them sound as if they are in pure ecstasy (I’ve often thought that a person listening to, but not seeing, a porcupine at its breakfast might assume that the animal is up to something else).

Unlike Cape porcupines, I’ve never seen an aggressive interaction between a PTP and a keeper. In fact, I’ve found them to be some of the sweetest, most interactive of animals. The first AZA porcupine that I worked with delighted in climbing up your leg, then your back, then your shoulder, until he was finally sitting atop your head. Then, he would stand on his back legs and sway, waving his front limbs in the air – when I would see him do it to other keepers, it reminded me of King Kong on top of the Empire State Building, beating his chest. When he was doing it to you, you were probably more preoccupied with the smell than the optics – these guys have a pungent aroma, which many people find unpleasant. The nose can only be described as unbelievably boopable.

View attachment 791357
A young male PTP coming in for the nose boop (very soft and spongy)

Like binturongs, the porcupine’s namesake tail makes a handy leash. The quills of this species are fairly small (compared to the pencil-sized spikes of Hystrix) and rarely seem to be erected. It can actually be fairly easy to forget that they’re there. The only time I ever saw them come into play was with one specimen who was in very poor health, and actually dying. The vet tech who was handling him wore a thick sweatshirt and gloves as she frequently turned him around, trying to medicate him and administer fluid – both garments were filled with short little quills by the time the session was over.

PTPs represent a challenge that was becoming apparent for many species in zoo management about 10 years ago. There are some species that are very sought after as ambassador animals, which have traditionally been hand reared and housed alone – binturong, Patagonian cavy, and the various armadillos have also been in this grouping. You’d read a Breeding and Transfer Plan, and while the population looked like it was in good shape at a glance, you’d soon start looking at the individual animals and see a surprisingly large number were listed as excluded as ambassadors. As a result, there was a heavy demand for animals, and yet no one was breeding them, so the numbers were falling. Realizing this, some of the SSPs and TAGs began to rethink how ambassador animal programs should work. There became a stronger desire to have animals that could multifunction as ambassadors AND breeders AND, in some cases, exhibit animals as well, with priority for placement given to zoos that would commit to trying to breed their animals.

Not only does this boost sustainability of populations, but it helps provide better quality of life for ambassador animals, many of which traditionally were kept in less-exciting housing and without as much conspecific socialization as exhibit animals of the same species. It may still be too early to tell how much these changes have moved the needle on efforts to conserve these species, but it was a positive step towards realizing that trying the same old management strategies weren’t going to improve the dynamics of these populations.
Hi Aardwolf, a couple of observations that may interest you. During a visit to Exmoor Zoo, I witnessed an animal behaviour whilst looking at a family group of tree porcupines, which was replicated later in the day. We were stood outside their enclosure watching a very laid back group of 7 porcupines. Suddenly, a small group of school children approached the enclosure and it was like a light went on within the group of animals. They started, well the only way that I can describe it, they started to entertain the children, climbing and playing within the group. After the children left ,the porcupines became laid back again. A couple of hours later, on my second tour of the zoo, again back at the porcupines enclosure, another group of children approached and exactly the same scenario occurred. I will never forget this! Have you witnessed a similar occurrence?
Your comment about the ecstatic noises that they make when eating, my Azaras agouti do exactly the same, especially with orange and mango.
 
@Strathmorezoo , how interesting, I've never seen that behavior, perhaps because I've never seen such a large group. I have noticed some animals (and I'm thinking particularly on one young bear I worked with) that seemed to enjoy performing, for lack of better word, because they enjoyed the attention that it brought from visitors. The bear in question had a large, ring-shaped toy, like a life preserver, that she once got around her neck, which quickly attracted a large crowd. While that first incident was an accident (we were worried that it was stuck when we saw it the first time), after that I would sometimes see her very deliberately place it around her head and then trot out to where the public could see her, hamming it up.

From a zoo perspective, the falcons are very interesting birds. They are among the wild bird that we have the longest history of maintaining in captivity, going back thousands of years. As a result, they are also one of the groups of birds that we know the most about managing and have the most techniques – be they husbandry, veterinary, or training – developed for. And yet it seems that they are seldom actually displayed in zoos – when you encounter a bird, it’s probably an ambassador, either a non-releasable rehab case, or a falconry bird (either retired or obtained for use in free-flight shows).

upload_2025-5-7_11-17-58.png
Like most of the falcons I worked with, these peregrine had a wing injury which prevented it from surviving in the wild

My experience with falcons has consisted of ambassador animals at two AZA zoos and at the raptor facility that I’ve mentioned in past posts. The experiences have involved three(ish) species: the peregrine falcon, the American kestrel, and what we generally referred to as a gyrfalcon, but actually a hybrid with a saker. Such hybrids are common in falconry, as you combine the size of the gyrfalcon with the greater hardiness and disease resistance of a more southerly bird species.

As our management of elephants in zoos has historically been based on circus culture, which in turn was influenced by mahout culture, so our management of falcons and other birds of prey has largely been influenced by falconry culture. Falconry has never been widely practiced in North America compared to Europe, the Middle East, and Asia (observe all of the bird of prey centers in modern day Europe compared to the US), but there are still a surprising number of falconers here if you root around for them (including our supervisor/mentor at the raptor center). I’m certain some of our European friends on this forum may have insights to share based on their experiences visiting or working in some facilities. The efforts of Tom Cade and the Peregrine Fund to save the peregrine falcon from extinction through breeding and release into the wild were largely influenced by Cade’s work with falconers.

Though they aren’t as closely related as previously thought, there isn’t an enormous amount of difference in the management between hawks and falcons in zoos and rehab centers that I’ve experienced. For one thing, housing tends to fairly similar. A typical stall in an off-exhibit mews (usually about 8 x 8 x 8 feet in my experience, larger for more flighted birds) consists of pea gravel substrate (easily hosed out – I recommend based on past experience putting some matting down in areas that are likely to be soiled so that they can be easily removed for cleaning), a series of perches of various sizes to prevent bumblefoot, and perhaps a solid partition/roofed area to serve as protection from the elements, though it’s good to have at least some of the roof exposed to the sky to allow in sun and rain for good feather condition. Fencing should be vertical bars.

upload_2025-5-7_11-16-50.png
Peregrine falcon outside sunning herself. You may not see the leash or the perch, off camera, but look in her right talon and you'll see that this bird has retained some hunting instinct.
The falcons spent fairly little time in their mews while we were present, and instead were often taken out and tethered to bow perches on a nearby grassy lawn. Multiple species could be out at the same time, provided they were spaced far enough apart that their leashes wouldn’t let them reach one another, which they figure out quickly enough. The greater cause for concern is wild raptors, and we would never leave our birds out unattended. This was especially true when the kestrels, smallest and most vulnerable of the birds, were out. I have seen some zoos were birds are out tethered constantly, which puts me in a mind of a parrot on a stick, if even more restrictive. I would have liked to have invested in a larger outdoor exercise pen that birds could rotate through, with some on the perches and some having more flight space. For falcons kept indoors, it’s especially nice to have them outside for a while after you clean their living quarters to allow the place to dry thoroughly; as with many birds, Asper is a leading cause of concern.

Whereas we often fed our North American accipters through the baffle holes to reduce disturbance, the falcons were often fed on the glove. Diet was much more bird-heavy for these animals than the Buteo hawks we worked with, with Japanese quail being the main feeder item. The gyrfalcon hybrid, being fully flighted, was often asked to fly short distances for small parts of her meal in order to keep in good condition (our birds were well-conditioned to handling, which allowed us to feel their keels regularly. This, combined with weekly weigh-ins, allowed us to accurately assess weight and body condition, an important component of keeping birds of prey healthy. Like other predators, raptors can be prone to obesity in captive settings).

Personality-wise, the falcons struck me as bolder and more confident than the accipeters, if slightly tenser and warier than the buteos. Each bird was paired with an individual keeper as a primary trainer, and they quickly formed strong bonds, even allowing keepers to clean their faces off by hand (when we fed them day old chicks, yolk sacs had a tendency to explode everywhere). We would occasionally use hoods and body wraps when trimming their beaks and talons, the former with a Dremel, the later with clippers. We also did regular inspections of their jesses and anklets to make sure that they were in good condition, replacing as needed.

All of the falcons regularly used for education programs. While the zoo birds were transported in sky kennels, the raptor center birds had special transport boxes custom made from airport aluminum, some of the best boxes I’d ever seen – very light-weight and well ventilated, while keeping the birds dark and calm inside.

upload_2025-5-7_11-18-53.png
A very young kestrel chick, which one of my co-supervisors is doing her best to keep warm. At least, that's what she told me she was doing when I saw her...
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-7_11-16-50.png
    upload_2025-5-7_11-16-50.png
    362 KB · Views: 170
  • upload_2025-5-7_11-17-58.png
    upload_2025-5-7_11-17-58.png
    890.5 KB · Views: 172
  • upload_2025-5-7_11-18-53.png
    upload_2025-5-7_11-18-53.png
    85 KB · Views: 159
I think of the Amazons as the forgotten parrots. Not as demanding or neurotic as the macaws and cockatoos, not as attention-seeking as the African gray, not as flashy or exciting (with some exceptions) as many other species, these birds are largely just… there. Short, squat, largely green with small highlights of color, not tremendously vocal, not overtly interactive, not inclined to fill up a space with motion and sound like conures or parakeets, these might be the non-entities of the bird world.

With the exception of a previously-managed population of Cuban amazon within AZA, and the ongoing commitment of a few AZA facilities to various Caribbean species (such as Lincoln Park Zoo with the Puerto Rican species), they really are just… there.

So how the heck have I wound up working with so many over the years? Heck if I know. Looking back at my list, I see I’ve worked with about half a dozen species – I wasn’t really keeping track in the early days of my career, when parrots were a closed book to me. Every single one was a surrendered pet (so no Cubans for me), and yet I found myself wondering, why did anyone particularly want a pet Amazon? What was the appeal of them, over other parrots? Maybe it’s because they are so relatively subdued, if in personality as well as color. I’ve never been bitten by one, or had one lunge at me, as frequently happened with macaws and cockatoos. They never struck me as real screamers. They seemed somewhat low energy, so perhaps not needing the space of other species. Or maybe that’s just the impression I’ve gotten from shoddy past pet owners.

Diet was parrot chow with produce at all facilities, some nuts mixed in more for enrichment than anything else – pretty much all parrots I’ve taken care of have the same diet, just variations on scale based on the size of the birds.

upload_2025-5-8_11-24-3.png

At the non-AZA zoos where I’ve worked with these birds, they’ve largely been kept in stereotypical pet store wire cages with newspaper bottoms, a few perches and toys. At the AZA zoo, they were initially kept off-exhibit in an enclosure about 8’ x 8’ x 8’, wooden frame, wire sides, heat lamp, and some perching. These birds – one blue-fronted, one orange-winged – were both surrendered pets which the zoo, not having any other housing options, had tried introducing to a family of cotton-topped tamarins in a large exhibit. The intro went… poorly, with one tamarin riding an amazon as it tried to fly away. The parrots were now lurking in the back for the indefinite future.

I really wanted to move them into a better situation, and settled on our sloth exhibit – much larger, much more complex, with sun (the holding area was in permanent shade), live plants, and other species to interact with. The curator at the time was very resistant, because many zoo managers take it for granted that parrots of all kind are just pruning shears with beaks with feathers that will destroy any exhibit they go in. Fortunately for me (and the birds), she left shortly after, and I was able to appeal to the director, and in the birds went. They did not cause any damage, and seemed much happier – certainly more active – after they moved. Unlike the tamarins, there were no interactions observed between the amazons and any of the other species – sloth, iguana, tortoise, curassow, Orinoco geese – in that exhibit. Since then, I’ve seen amazons in large, walk-through rainforest exhibits at other zoos, which reinforces my belief that the birds wouldn’t have been a problem despite the curator’s fears. This is one of the happier zoo memories, not because I particularly have a lot of interest in amazons, but because it was such a massive improvement in animal welfare a such little cost and such little effort.

For that matter, these two amazons didn’t really seem to interact with each other two much. They seemed like they were always in one another’s company, but I think that’s mostly because they always happened to want to be in the same spot and the other just happened to be there.

upload_2025-5-8_11-24-22.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-8_11-24-3.png
    upload_2025-5-8_11-24-3.png
    998.4 KB · Views: 159
  • upload_2025-5-8_11-24-22.png
    upload_2025-5-8_11-24-22.png
    829.6 KB · Views: 163
I think of the Amazons as the forgotten parrots. Not as demanding or neurotic as the macaws and cockatoos, not as attention-seeking as the African gray, not as flashy or exciting (with some exceptions) as many other species, these birds are largely just… there. Short, squat, largely green with small highlights of color, not tremendously vocal, not overtly interactive, not inclined to fill up a space with motion and sound like conures or parakeets, these might be the non-entities of the bird world.

With the exception of a previously-managed population of Cuban amazon within AZA, and the ongoing commitment of a few AZA facilities to various Caribbean species (such as Lincoln Park Zoo with the Puerto Rican species), they really are just… there.

So how the heck have I wound up working with so many over the years? Heck if I know. Looking back at my list, I see I’ve worked with about half a dozen species – I wasn’t really keeping track in the early days of my career, when parrots were a closed book to me. Every single one was a surrendered pet (so no Cubans for me), and yet I found myself wondering, why did anyone particularly want a pet Amazon? What was the appeal of them, over other parrots? Maybe it’s because they are so relatively subdued, if in personality as well as color. I’ve never been bitten by one, or had one lunge at me, as frequently happened with macaws and cockatoos. They never struck me as real screamers. They seemed somewhat low energy, so perhaps not needing the space of other species. Or maybe that’s just the impression I’ve gotten from shoddy past pet owners.

Diet was parrot chow with produce at all facilities, some nuts mixed in more for enrichment than anything else – pretty much all parrots I’ve taken care of have the same diet, just variations on scale based on the size of the birds.

View attachment 791763

At the non-AZA zoos where I’ve worked with these birds, they’ve largely been kept in stereotypical pet store wire cages with newspaper bottoms, a few perches and toys. At the AZA zoo, they were initially kept off-exhibit in an enclosure about 8’ x 8’ x 8’, wooden frame, wire sides, heat lamp, and some perching. These birds – one blue-fronted, one orange-winged – were both surrendered pets which the zoo, not having any other housing options, had tried introducing to a family of cotton-topped tamarins in a large exhibit. The intro went… poorly, with one tamarin riding an amazon as it tried to fly away. The parrots were now lurking in the back for the indefinite future.

I really wanted to move them into a better situation, and settled on our sloth exhibit – much larger, much more complex, with sun (the holding area was in permanent shade), live plants, and other species to interact with. The curator at the time was very resistant, because many zoo managers take it for granted that parrots of all kind are just pruning shears with beaks with feathers that will destroy any exhibit they go in. Fortunately for me (and the birds), she left shortly after, and I was able to appeal to the director, and in the birds went. They did not cause any damage, and seemed much happier – certainly more active – after they moved. Unlike the tamarins, there were no interactions observed between the amazons and any of the other species – sloth, iguana, tortoise, curassow, Orinoco geese – in that exhibit. Since then, I’ve seen amazons in large, walk-through rainforest exhibits at other zoos, which reinforces my belief that the birds wouldn’t have been a problem despite the curator’s fears. This is one of the happier zoo memories, not because I particularly have a lot of interest in amazons, but because it was such a massive improvement in animal welfare a such little cost and such little effort.

For that matter, these two amazons didn’t really seem to interact with each other two much. They seemed like they were always in one another’s company, but I think that’s mostly because they always happened to want to be in the same spot and the other just happened to be there.

View attachment 791765
Hi Aardwolf, my experience with Amazons.
I obtained a young pair of Blue Fronted Amazon's, 10 years ago, the first year of Strathmorezoo. They were housed in a 16ft×8ft×7ft aviary with heated indoor aviary. For the first four months they were quiet friendly birds and would take grapes, gently from my hand. And then I introduced a barrel for them to breed in. Within days they had changed into screaming ,biting monsters. Even though our nearest neighbours are about half a mile away they could hear them, at all hours of the day. I removed the barrel, hoping this would calm them down, it got worse!! The hen started to attack the cock bird. I split them up and the screaming got louder. I contacted a dealer, who offered to take them . Within a few days with him, they had calmed down enough to be moved to a new collection. I then had to calm my neighbours, the last thing I wanted was for them to object to my zoo. Put me off Amazons for good!!
 
What was the appeal of them, over other parrots?

I have seen Amazons quite often used in parrot shelters as somewhat of calming "replacement characters" to more high-strung birds, such as (asocial / neurotic) cockatoos that have displayed intraspecific aggression. In comparison to such nervous wrecks, they are apparently the chill mellow ones...

parrots of all kind are just pruning shears with beaks [and] feathers that will destroy any exhibit they go in.
To the credit of said zoo managers: some species and individual parrot specimens can be indeed like that, sometimes with a touch of chainsaw & jackhammer. Especially when bored and not properly kept.
 
Apart from the varanids, the giants of the lizard world are the iguanas, and many zoo enthusiasts will be well acquainted both with the green iguana and with the Caribbean rock iguanas. I’ve worked with the green iguana at one AZA and one non-AZA zoo (as well as having kept them as personal pets), and the rhinoceros iguana in one AZA zoo.

Green iguanas in zoos are most often surrendered pets from the public, which means that you don’t always know the backstory of the animal that you’re taking in, or what its health is. Some may come to you with some metabolic bone disease, or stunted growth, or issues from an inappropriate diet. Many of them were kept predominately indoors and fed cheap foods. I know that as a young kid I probably didn’t do the best job taking care of pet iguanas, and I’d hate to know how many little graves are in my parents’ yard… Like with African grays and other exotic pets, zoos that house green iguanas have a special obligation, I feel, to demonstrate ideal standards of care in order to inform visitors of best practices and influence pet care decisions.

At the non-AZA zoo, the iguanas were kept in an indoor exhibit in our reptile house, which they shared with a pair of red-footed tortoises, a few Russian tortoises, and, briefly, a sloth. The exhibit was about 300 square feet, plywood (which made misting it a challenge), with a screen door and walls made of window panels. The floor was mulch, and there were several branches and platforms, with heat and white lamps over some of them. It wasn’t the best lighting, but it helped that the iguanas double-functioned as program animals, so they were brought outside frequently to get sun in warmer months.

(Side note: like many rainforest reptiles, it can be a challenge to get humidity for tropical reptiles right, especially if your exhibit is plywood, doesn't hold humidity, and starts to rot if it gets too wet, so you want to keep an eye on the shedding of your animals. One of the most addictive habits I picked up as a keeper was picking off the sheds from the little spines that ran the back of the male iguana).

At the AZA zoo, the iguanas shared an outdoor exhibit, about 600 square feet, with sloth, curassow, Orinoco goose, amazons, red-footed tortoise, and titi monkeys. This exhibit was lushly planted with lots of real and artificial perching, a small pool, and 24/7 access for much of the year (the iguanas and tortoises were brought into the zoo hospital for the winter). I’ve developed a strong conviction over the years of working with reptiles that sunlight takes care of almost all problems, and it amazed me how much more active and alert the AZA iguanas, with their months of sun at a time, were compared to the non-AZA; I have a particularly vivid memory of one being irritated by a titi monkey and charging/chasing after it for some distance. It reminded me of a dragon. One thing zoo green iguanas don’t do great is stay green (though even in the wild state adults aren’t as green as juveniles) – when I saw this species for the wild in the first time in Central America, I almost didn’t recognize it.

Diet at the non-AZA zoo was chopped salad, mostly romaine, with some fruits and veggies mixed in, calcium powder sprinkled over. The AZA diet was similar, but with more varied greens in place of just romaine, as well as some Mazuri tortoise pellets. Even though the species is largely herbivorous, we did note some incidents of them going after the protein component of the red-footed tortoise and curassow diets, and took steps to prevent that.

As much as reptiles enjoy outdoor access and warm temps, it can sometimes feel tempting to push the envelope on them and let them stay out for a wider window of the year than they should. Don’t do that. You have some wiggle room with birds and mammals, in many cases, but with herps temperatures are one husbandry component that I never mess with. 50 Fahrenheit was my cut off for them.

As with many large lizards, I’ve noticed a tendency for increased sunlight and temp to make iguanas sometimes surly; or maybe they were always surly, and the light and heat just gave them the ability to act on it. Early in the spring they’d be tractable; by the end of the summer, they were hot-blooded and hot-tempered, ready to lash with a tail or scratch with claws, or even lunge at (this observation was also shared by Raymond Ditmars of the Bronx Zoo in the early 1900s, who described monitor lizards being calm and docile in winter holding, savage after time outdoors). A large iguana or monitor can safely be held with one hand at the base of the neck, the other at the base of the tail – but that still leaves the claws, which can rake you as the animal tries to wriggle loose. I learned to always have a long-sleeved shirt in my locker

Husbandry wise, my experience with rhino iguanas wasn’t that different from green in terms of diet and temp guidelines. In the winter, the group lived in an off-exhibit holding building, fairly spartan with rubber matting, a water tub, and lots of deadfall positioned under heat lamps. During the warmer months, they lived in a large, moated outdoor enclosure, a sunken pit with a rocky hill that put them roughly at eye level with guests. It was sparsely planted, very scrubby, and caught the full sun, through there were a few shady alcoves to retreat to. (Coming from a more arid environment, shedding didn't seem to be as big of a challenge for these guys as it did the green iguanas). They were nominally the only species in the exhibit, though some map turtles inexplicably appeared over the years, and the rocks (and sometimes the iguanas themselves) were constantly being scurried over by small Sceloporus lizards. The group consisted of one big male and several smaller females, with the big guy often sitting on the top of the hill, from which he could keep an eye on all of the females with ease.

One of the females was a fairly small individual, somewhat stunted in size, and as such was kept in the reptile house itself, in an off-exhibit cage. She was a particularly sassy reptile, who I dubbed Psycho Laura (a play on the genus name Cyclura). When you opened the door to her cage, which was at eye level, she would launch herself at you, which was somewhat unnerving because the cage was elevated, and therefore her mouth was at face level with you as soon as you opened the door.

The very first week on the job, a senior keeper was training me and had me open the door. Sure enough, the iguana charged my face. I had a split second to react, and side-stepped her neatly. She flew past me and landed on the floor; before she was able to react, I dropped down, grabbed her, and tossed her back in the enclosure. My trainer was very pleased and impressed at the response and told me so clearly, which left me feeling very proud… later, I recounted the story to another keeper, who told me that, according to zoo policy, that would have still counted as an escape which would have gotten me a mandatory 5-day suspension, and that I should probably keep that story to myself.

It was an odd place to work.
 
later, I recounted the story to another keeper, who told me that, according to zoo policy, that would have still counted as an escape which would have gotten me a mandatory 5-day suspension, and that I should probably keep that story to myself.
That sounds like probably one of the worst employee policies a zoo could possibly have.
 
@birdsandbats , I can't say you're wrong about that - I remember being flabbergasted that you could, through ineptitude, kill as many animals as you liked, but if a frog hit the floor, you were in deep trouble. If I had kept my mouth shut, other keepers wouldn't be warned that this is how that animal was likely to respond when her door was opened, and they might not have had the luck that I had. Months later, a coworker and I spent hours secretly searching the back of the reptile house for a monitor lizard he'd let loose, afraid to let our boss know about it, before we finally recaptured her. The reason for this strange zoo culture was that, a year or two before I started, there had been a series of animal escapes, some of them somewhat high profile, and the zoo got a lot of bad press over them. As a result, it led to an institutional culture in which allowing escapes of any kind, any definition became an unforgivable sin. I do know that the culture at that zoo has dramatically changed for the better (on this and many other fronts).

Up to this point, my posts on the felids have been focused on the big cats – tiger, jaguar, clouded leopard, and cheetah. I have worked with lion, leopard, snow leopard, and puma, but each to a fairly limited degree, and don’t really have much in the way of stories or expert knowledge of those species. And so, we’ll scoot on down to some of the smaller cats.

I’ve worked with servals at four zoos – three non-AZA, one AZA – and caracal at two zoos – one AZA, one non-AZA.

My experiences with the servals were much more in depth, not just based on the number of individuals at the number of zoos, but for how closely I worked with them and how much we interacted. My first serval – and one who I did not work with too closely – was the AZA one, an ambassador animal. She lived in some modular caging in our ambassador holding area, a living space that no one would consider adequate for an animal of her size today. Apart from that, she didn’t leave much of an impression on me, and my responsibilities with her were fairly basic – feed, water, and clean, usually while her primary trainer was working with her elsewhere – so not much needs to be said about her.

Servals are among the most abundant of cats in the private sector – so much so that I can actually go quite a while without seeing one on exhibit in an AZA facility (and perhaps as a result have seen fairly few truly great, or even decent, displays of this species. Perhaps it’s because they serve as a decent stand in, as far as visitors were concerned, for any cat that wasn’t a lion or tiger, and we’d frequently hear them called cheetahs, leopards, bobcats, etc.

The first non-AZA serval I worked with was at a very shabby roadside zoo, where he lived in a ramshackle wood and wire cage that had been tacked onto the side of an old mill in a forgotten corner of the zoo. We had no real shift area, so the only way to work with the cat was free contact, which was problematic because a) it was a fairly small space and b) it was a fairly unfriendly cat – the second you opened the door, he was hissing, spitting, and often advancing in a manner that was somewhat intimidating. As a result, most keepers tended to throw the meat (a lump of Nebraska diet), grab what poop they could (the poop in the back of the enclosure tended to mold, untouched), and run – the water bowl was up against the fence, and as such could be filled from the outside, though usually with a lot of spilling.

upload_2025-5-12_9-48-51.png
The male serval I trained, demonstrating his newfound willingness to stay and wait for a meatball

I was new to the zoo and resolved to do better, so I started training the cat (I’d just discovered the concept of training at, like many young keepers, seemed to think that I invented it). And so, because I didn’t want any of the other keepers to half-butt glom onto my program and mess it up, I decided to train the cat using commands in Swahili (I’d studied abroad in college and was still fairly fluent at the time, so in fact I only even spoke to the cat in Swahili). Within a month, the cat was responding to commands for “Come,” “Stay,” “Sit,” “Jump” (to redirect him to an elevated platform, but also for exercise – both servals and caracals are amazing jumpers), and “Go Away.” This experience reinforced in me the belief that aggressive animals can actually be fairly easy to train – they at least want to interact with you, and it’s just a matter of redirecting that energy into a positive manner. By the time I left that zoo, the serval and I were on pretty decent terms, though I still never turned my back on him.

I had much warmer relations with the servals at the other two non-AZA zoos, where I worked with a pair of sisters at each. At one zoo they lived in a Behlen cage, with wood shavings for substrate, a few perches, and a nest box. At the other, a slightly larger, elongated cage of wooden poles with wire, grass and dirt substrate, and some deadfall and platforms, with nest boxes. At the later zoo, there was a small shift area, too small for both cats, but which allowed us to separate them for feeding, at least. In the Behlen cage at the other zoo (which didn’t even have an entry vestibule), we had to go in with both. At each zoo, the cats were out year round with a heat lamp in their nest box. The diet at both zoos was Nebraska feline diet (ground horse), supplemented with chickens, rats, rabbits, and other whole prey.

In the Behlen cage, we would clean and water in the morning; in the late afternoon, two keepers would go in to train the servals. Their behaviors were fairly basic – sit, stay, jump up (onto the roof of the nest box), and present paws. They would take their diet (which for some reason I never understood we mixed with oil and vitamin powder, something I’ve never done with feline diet anywhere else, and which made it smell rancid) in the form of several small meatballs, eating fairly gently from our hands. They were a very affectionate pair of cats, towards each other and towards us, and we talked a lot about leash-training them and taking them for walks, but never got around to it… perhaps for fear that maybe they wouldn’t be so well-behaved once they got outside.

upload_2025-5-12_9-47-51.png
A keeper doing a training session with one of our servals. The cup at the front of her belt holds the meat mixture

Around the time I left the non-Behlen zoo, a make serval was brought in for breeding, and intros were in progress at the time I departed. Perhaps they should have gone slower. I was told by one of my former colleagues shortly after I’d left that the male had killed and partially eaten one of the females not long after I left. I considered myself very glad to not have been present for that experience.

Compared to servals, caracals struck me as very shy, very reclusive cats. My experience at the AZA zoo was with a pair of sisters on exhibit in a cage that had been built for big cats years ago, and was now repurposed for the servals. As a result, it was one of the finer habitats I’ve seen for this species, and I regret that it’s no longer in use – it was a good size, well-planted (you couldn’t have kept so many plants going with a leopard or jaguar in there), lot of deadfall, soil substrate, and a heated den building at the back, which would have been cramped for the bigger cats but was ideal for these guys. They weren’t the best of exhibit animals, and often stayed hunkered down in a little hollow towards the rear of the exhibit, with their tall, tufted ears and their eyes being all that was visible. So, a great habitat for them, but perhaps not the best suited for them as an exhibit.

That being said, they were also one in a row of cages, and we didn’t really interact with them except to give them food and clean, shifting them off exhibit in this case. I wonder what it would have been like if we’d had daily training sessions with them, like we did for the servals at the non-AZA zoo I worked at years after? I’ve heard a zoo professional say that for small cats in zoos, the biggest factor in determining their welfare isn’t the size of the exhibit or the amount of enrichment, it’s the relationship they have with the keeper. If they are calm and comfortable in our presence, they will thrive. If they are not, their lives will be filled with anxiety and neurosis.

At the non-AZA zoo, the lone caracal lived in a decently large but fairly sterile, concrete-floored, wire-fronted cage that ran alongside our giraffe barn. We had to work free contact with her, which stressed her out, as she had nowhere satisfactory to hide from us. She wasn’t a satisfying animal to work with, for reasons which we can largely attribute to the limitations of her habitat. I wanted to bring in wheelbarrow loads of sand to floor the exhibit, then some rocks and logs, but was vetoed by the owners (the owners of the zoo had an annoying habit of bringing in young, AZA trained keepers with lots of enthusiasm and a savior complex, telling them that they could have free rein to turn the place around, and then not allowing them to actually do anything, certainly anything that would cost money, until the keeper left as a burned out husk of who they were. I digress).

upload_2025-5-12_9-46-47.png
Sahara, the caracal. She was never happy to see us

The smaller felids have historically had reputations in zoos of being poor doers, poor breeders, and poor exhibits. It was around this time that I decided it was because we treated them as second-class species, tucked in on the margins and given minimal resources and space. If given exhibits large enough and complex enough that they can feel secure, the chance to develop strong relationships with keepers to build confidence, and encouragement to use enrichment and participate in training, they could be excellent animals to work with and to display.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-12_9-46-47.png
    upload_2025-5-12_9-46-47.png
    244.7 KB · Views: 128
  • upload_2025-5-12_9-47-51.png
    upload_2025-5-12_9-47-51.png
    753.9 KB · Views: 113
  • upload_2025-5-12_9-48-51.png
    upload_2025-5-12_9-48-51.png
    1 MB · Views: 122
@birdsandbats , I can't say you're wrong about that - I remember being flabbergasted that you could, through ineptitude, kill as many animals as you liked, but if a frog hit the floor, you were in deep trouble. If I had kept my mouth shut, other keepers wouldn't be warned that this is how that animal was likely to respond when her door was opened, and they might not have had the luck that I had. Months later, a coworker and I spent hours secretly searching the back of the reptile house for a monitor lizard he'd let loose, afraid to let our boss know about it, before we finally recaptured her. The reason for this strange zoo culture was that, a year or two before I started, there had been a series of animal escapes, some of them somewhat high profile, and the zoo got a lot of bad press over them. As a result, it led to an institutional culture in which allowing escapes of any kind, any definition became an unforgivable sin. I do know that the culture at that zoo has dramatically changed for the better (on this and many other fronts).

Up to this point, my posts on the felids have been focused on the big cats – tiger, jaguar, clouded leopard, and cheetah. I have worked with lion, leopard, snow leopard, and puma, but each to a fairly limited degree, and don’t really have much in the way of stories or expert knowledge of those species. And so, we’ll scoot on down to some of the smaller cats.

I’ve worked with servals at four zoos – three non-AZA, one AZA – and caracal at two zoos – one AZA, one non-AZA.

My experiences with the servals were much more in depth, not just based on the number of individuals at the number of zoos, but for how closely I worked with them and how much we interacted. My first serval – and one who I did not work with too closely – was the AZA one, an ambassador animal. She lived in some modular caging in our ambassador holding area, a living space that no one would consider adequate for an animal of her size today. Apart from that, she didn’t leave much of an impression on me, and my responsibilities with her were fairly basic – feed, water, and clean, usually while her primary trainer was working with her elsewhere – so not much needs to be said about her.

Servals are among the most abundant of cats in the private sector – so much so that I can actually go quite a while without seeing one on exhibit in an AZA facility (and perhaps as a result have seen fairly few truly great, or even decent, displays of this species. Perhaps it’s because they serve as a decent stand in, as far as visitors were concerned, for any cat that wasn’t a lion or tiger, and we’d frequently hear them called cheetahs, leopards, bobcats, etc.

The first non-AZA serval I worked with was at a very shabby roadside zoo, where he lived in a ramshackle wood and wire cage that had been tacked onto the side of an old mill in a forgotten corner of the zoo. We had no real shift area, so the only way to work with the cat was free contact, which was problematic because a) it was a fairly small space and b) it was a fairly unfriendly cat – the second you opened the door, he was hissing, spitting, and often advancing in a manner that was somewhat intimidating. As a result, most keepers tended to throw the meat (a lump of Nebraska diet), grab what poop they could (the poop in the back of the enclosure tended to mold, untouched), and run – the water bowl was up against the fence, and as such could be filled from the outside, though usually with a lot of spilling.

View attachment 792369
The male serval I trained, demonstrating his newfound willingness to stay and wait for a meatball

I was new to the zoo and resolved to do better, so I started training the cat (I’d just discovered the concept of training at, like many young keepers, seemed to think that I invented it). And so, because I didn’t want any of the other keepers to half-butt glom onto my program and mess it up, I decided to train the cat using commands in Swahili (I’d studied abroad in college and was still fairly fluent at the time, so in fact I only even spoke to the cat in Swahili). Within a month, the cat was responding to commands for “Come,” “Stay,” “Sit,” “Jump” (to redirect him to an elevated platform, but also for exercise – both servals and caracals are amazing jumpers), and “Go Away.” This experience reinforced in me the belief that aggressive animals can actually be fairly easy to train – they at least want to interact with you, and it’s just a matter of redirecting that energy into a positive manner. By the time I left that zoo, the serval and I were on pretty decent terms, though I still never turned my back on him.

I had much warmer relations with the servals at the other two non-AZA zoos, where I worked with a pair of sisters at each. At one zoo they lived in a Behlen cage, with wood shavings for substrate, a few perches, and a nest box. At the other, a slightly larger, elongated cage of wooden poles with wire, grass and dirt substrate, and some deadfall and platforms, with nest boxes. At the later zoo, there was a small shift area, too small for both cats, but which allowed us to separate them for feeding, at least. In the Behlen cage at the other zoo (which didn’t even have an entry vestibule), we had to go in with both. At each zoo, the cats were out year round with a heat lamp in their nest box. The diet at both zoos was Nebraska feline diet (ground horse), supplemented with chickens, rats, rabbits, and other whole prey.

In the Behlen cage, we would clean and water in the morning; in the late afternoon, two keepers would go in to train the servals. Their behaviors were fairly basic – sit, stay, jump up (onto the roof of the nest box), and present paws. They would take their diet (which for some reason I never understood we mixed with oil and vitamin powder, something I’ve never done with feline diet anywhere else, and which made it smell rancid) in the form of several small meatballs, eating fairly gently from our hands. They were a very affectionate pair of cats, towards each other and towards us, and we talked a lot about leash-training them and taking them for walks, but never got around to it… perhaps for fear that maybe they wouldn’t be so well-behaved once they got outside.

View attachment 792368
A keeper doing a training session with one of our servals. The cup at the front of her belt holds the meat mixture

Around the time I left the non-Behlen zoo, a make serval was brought in for breeding, and intros were in progress at the time I departed. Perhaps they should have gone slower. I was told by one of my former colleagues shortly after I’d left that the male had killed and partially eaten one of the females not long after I left. I considered myself very glad to not have been present for that experience.

Compared to servals, caracals struck me as very shy, very reclusive cats. My experience at the AZA zoo was with a pair of sisters on exhibit in a cage that had been built for big cats years ago, and was now repurposed for the servals. As a result, it was one of the finer habitats I’ve seen for this species, and I regret that it’s no longer in use – it was a good size, well-planted (you couldn’t have kept so many plants going with a leopard or jaguar in there), lot of deadfall, soil substrate, and a heated den building at the back, which would have been cramped for the bigger cats but was ideal for these guys. They weren’t the best of exhibit animals, and often stayed hunkered down in a little hollow towards the rear of the exhibit, with their tall, tufted ears and their eyes being all that was visible. So, a great habitat for them, but perhaps not the best suited for them as an exhibit.

That being said, they were also one in a row of cages, and we didn’t really interact with them except to give them food and clean, shifting them off exhibit in this case. I wonder what it would have been like if we’d had daily training sessions with them, like we did for the servals at the non-AZA zoo I worked at years after? I’ve heard a zoo professional say that for small cats in zoos, the biggest factor in determining their welfare isn’t the size of the exhibit or the amount of enrichment, it’s the relationship they have with the keeper. If they are calm and comfortable in our presence, they will thrive. If they are not, their lives will be filled with anxiety and neurosis.

At the non-AZA zoo, the lone caracal lived in a decently large but fairly sterile, concrete-floored, wire-fronted cage that ran alongside our giraffe barn. We had to work free contact with her, which stressed her out, as she had nowhere satisfactory to hide from us. She wasn’t a satisfying animal to work with, for reasons which we can largely attribute to the limitations of her habitat. I wanted to bring in wheelbarrow loads of sand to floor the exhibit, then some rocks and logs, but was vetoed by the owners (the owners of the zoo had an annoying habit of bringing in young, AZA trained keepers with lots of enthusiasm and a savior complex, telling them that they could have free rein to turn the place around, and then not allowing them to actually do anything, certainly anything that would cost money, until the keeper left as a burned out husk of who they were. I digress).

View attachment 792367
Sahara, the caracal. She was never happy to see us

The smaller felids have historically had reputations in zoos of being poor doers, poor breeders, and poor exhibits. It was around this time that I decided it was because we treated them as second-class species, tucked in on the margins and given minimal resources and space. If given exhibits large enough and complex enough that they can feel secure, the chance to develop strong relationships with keepers to build confidence, and encouragement to use enrichment and participate in training, they could be excellent animals to work with and to display.
Hi Aardwolf
Like you, I have also worked with. Caracal and I agree ,the pair that I knew never seemed happy to see me. I have also worked with three other species, Ocelot, Leopard cat and European Lynx. Out of these my favourite were the Lynx. The pair and the three cubs were really friendly, particularly the male. Never showed any hostility even when being in the enclosure with them. The Ocelot pair ,were the opposite, quite aggressive. The Leopard cats would usually try and hide away. All of their enclosures were a good size and had plenty of planting. Although, I have never worked with Serval, a friend at another zoo had a tame female who I would go and play rough and tumble with. With regard to your comment that historically small cats were bad doers,I have never seen that. However, I agree that giving the animals good enclosures, enrichment and keeper would be much better for the animals. The one species that I always wanted to work with was Pumas, sadly never have and not likely to now.I have worked with African lions,a male and three female pride. When people looked at the male, they would be mystified by the plaits in his mane.Yup,being a silly lion, he used to come close to the mesh to have his ear tickled, hence the plaits.
 
Last edited:
I had been switching these posts up taxonomically to keep things fresh, but I think I’m going to plug along with the rest of the small/mid-sized cats; we'll call this part 2 of 3. Today, I’ll look at lynxes and bobcats. I’ve worked with bobcats at two AZA facilities, Canada lynx at one non-AZA facility, and a bobcat/Eurasian lynx hybrid at one non-AZA zoo. Husbandry between the two species is fairly similar in my experience, with the main difference being that the Canada lynx is typically less tolerant of heat (the SSP has encouraged the more northerly zoos in the US to switch from bobcat to Canada lynx, where practical. Bobcats are managed as a studbook, but breeding within AZA is not recommended). Despite the differences in diet in the wild state – the bobcat being a generalist, the lynx more of a specialist – diet was very similar.

My first bobcats were at the same AZA zoo as the caracals I described yesterday, in an identical enclosure, built for larger carnivores, repurposed for smaller ones. They were a sibling pair, managed protected contact. I worked much more closely with the bobcat at the other AZA facility. He was an older male, the last of three siblings which the zoo had acquired together years ago, living in a mesh-enclosed exhibit about 600 square feet, including a few small trees and some deadfall, and a very small pool as a water source. The exhibit did have a small shift area built into it, but we only ever used it for something that would involve the exhibit doors (both the door to the keeper area and to the exhibit) being opened at the same time. Otherwise, we just went in with him.

He was a very friendly cat that we all loved giving back scratches to, though we were all mindful of not doing so when we were open to the public, so as not to encourage inappropriate visitor behavior. Some of us got a little too friendly with him – the wife of a new keeper let slip to us one day that her husband had been letting her come by and play with him after hours. Likewise, some of our volunteers took liberties that I didn't especially approve of. I actually tripped more than once in that exhibit when he would force himself between my legs as I tried to clean, rubbing up against me enthusiastically.

upload_2025-5-13_8-40-29.png

This cat was afflicted by a series of abscesses on his back which were long-lasting and never quite healed up, despite the best efforts of our vet. They were special cause of concern for us in the summer months, what with the flies. It was a good thing that this animal was so friendly towards us, as it allowed us to apply ointment to his back regularly. If he’d been a less tolerant animal, I think his back would have turned into a maggot-infested mess, and we would have lost him years earlier.

Diet consisted of Nebraska horse meat, supplemented with a rotation of fish, chicken, rat, and rabbit. We provided enrichment daily – toys, bison shed, scent enrichment, etc – though as a fairly old cat he didn’t show too much interest in much of it. For that reason, he also seldom used any of the climbing opportunities in the exhibit and stuck to the floor (between a love of food and a disdain for activity, he would up being a somewhat portly fellow in his later years). Mostly he liked to nap in the sun when we weren’t around. There was a nest box for shelter, unheated – being a native species, there was never a need for supplemental heating, and like many cats he seemed more uncomfortable with the summer heat than the winter cold.

The Canada lynx was at the same non-AZA zoo as the caracal I described yesterday; they were actually neighbors in identical exhibits (though unlike the caracal, the lynx did not have an indoor holding area), which shared a keeper area in between the two. One thing I did NOT realize my first day at that zoo was that, perhaps as a concession to the small size of the exhibit, the lynx was given access to the keeper area as well as its main exhibit. I went into the keeper area, closed the door to the outside, and was about to open the door to the caracal exhibit, when I suddenly felt something furry brushing the back of my legs. Sure enough, I turned around very slowly, and there was the lynx, nuzzling against me. Almost 20 years later, I’m still surprised by how bizarrely run that zoo was.

upload_2025-5-13_8-41-13.png
The Canada lynx in easily the sorriest cat exhibit I've ever seen

That same zoo also had the bobcat-lynx hybrid. Whereas all other Lynx I’ve worked with have been fairly docile, often friendly animals, this cat was an absolute spitfire, always hissing and spitting, and had the distinction of being the first cat to draw blood for me with a quick swipe. She was fairly small – much closer in size to a bobcat than a Eurasian lynx and her face struck me as more bobcat, but the pattern of the coat was much closer to a Eurasian lynx. She was in a wood-and-wire exhibit about 300 square feet, which unfortunately kept us in pretty close quarters during servicing. How close in personality or temper she was to a pure Eurasian lynx I can’t say, never having worked with one, though I concede it’s possible that having to be kept in such close proximity to humans (and many of her keepers lacked basic animal sense) may have contributed to her overall foul mood.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-13_8-40-29.png
    upload_2025-5-13_8-40-29.png
    674.4 KB · Views: 122
  • upload_2025-5-13_8-41-13.png
    upload_2025-5-13_8-41-13.png
    431.6 KB · Views: 119
Rounding out the small cat series, we’ll wrap things up with the ocelot. I’ve worked with two ocelots at one AZA facility, one replacing the other after the original animal’s passing.

The ocelot (as we only had one at a time) was housed in an outdoor enclosure about 600 square feet in a wooded section of the zoo. The enclosure was a tangle of deadfall; the cat could probably go the entire length of the exhibit without touching the ground. At one end of the exhibit was a fake rock wall which concealed the entrance to the indoor holding building (off exhibit), as well as a small waterfall, barely a trickle, really, that fed a small pool. Running along the back of the exhibit were a series of shift pens that had, in the past, been used for holding and introductions, though I never used them for either ocelot while working with them, as there was no need. I'd always be up for making enclosures larger (I could happily have doubled the size of this one), and I would have liked an indoor exhibit area too, but overall this was one of the better ocelot exhibits I've seen - too often I see them shoehorned into glassed-in boxes in rainforest buildings.

upload_2025-5-14_9-47-36.png

The first ocelot, an older male, was a fairly calm animal, who could become downright friendly at feeding time. He’d often be at the exhibit door waiting for me in the late afternoon, and I often fed him by playing “catch.” His usual diet was a base of Nebraska feline diet, with a few chicks, mice, or a rat, fish, or chicken quarter as an accompaniment (sometimes a rabbit or small carcass as well). I’d open the door and then throw a rat or other prey item towards the back of the exhibit, and he’d race after it, then come back for another. Sometimes I would plop the meat down in its bowl and leave him with it. Sometimes I’d break it into a series of small meatballs and leave them scattered across the branches of the enclosure for him to find, rubbing it around to create scent trails.

As you will have surmised from the above statement, we worked free contact with him with never a problem. Apart from occasionally wanting some scratches (usually associated with feeding times), he mostly kept to himself and gave us distance; in the mornings, when I cleaned the holding building (modular caging inside a block building), he’d dutifully trot outside. When I cleaned the yard (you could expect to find one pile of poop daily, which I usually smelled before I saw), he’d either go inside or keep his distance. Very rarely did we have to lock him inside – usually only if the weather was below 20 Fahrenheit, as his building stayed fairly toasty and he exercised good judgement about going in when he needed to. On occasions when he was locked it, it was usually for such a short duration that we passed over cleaning until he could be outside again (the indoor holding area allotted to him was only about 36 square feet, with a few ledges and platforms, built with the understanding he’d seldom be locked in).

Besides prey items, enrichment was bags and cardboard boxes (he loved things he could tear), bison or alpaca fur, kongs, and scents. We didn’t do any training with him, but that was more of a staffing issue than a belief that he wouldn’t be receptive to it.

Ocelots are a solitary species, but you still need to breed them. Our boy was occasionally transferred to other zoos for breeding purposes (he also participated in a semen extraction for artificial insemination). He didn’t like those road trips, and it showed in his temper – I went to pick him up from one zoo after a stay, and was surprised to see that the staff there were all terrified of him, as he was a snarly mess while he was there, and worked him protected contact. They were equally surprised when I stepped into the holding cage with him and, far from ripping my face off, he came up to take a chick from my hand.

upload_2025-5-14_9-45-49.png
A close up view of our handsome boy's teeth while he was sedated for a medical procedure. As is often the case in zoos, when you have an animal knocked down for one reason, you usually take the opportunity to do a lot of other minor jobs while you're at it, in this case a dental cleaning

When the old man passed away, we brought in a young female. She was a much less satisfactory animal to work with, because no matter what we did, she was just so painfully shy. Maybe it was because she was young, maybe it’s because females are smaller than males. No playing catch or scratches behind the ears for her – I most often saw her sitting in the doorway leading to her outdoor exhibit, peering out at me with wary eyes. One night we put a nocturnal trail camera on her exhibit, and were amazed to see how active and energetic she was at night. Not only did she eat the diet that she refused to touch while the zoo was open to the public (and as a result, we began feeding her as the last thing before heading out), she vigorously played with all the enrichment, climbed all over the place, and made a splendid show of herself. If visitors could have seen that, she would have been the most popular animal in the zoo, I’m sure.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-14_9-45-49.png
    upload_2025-5-14_9-45-49.png
    1 MB · Views: 120
  • upload_2025-5-14_9-47-36.png
    upload_2025-5-14_9-47-36.png
    889.4 KB · Views: 120
Folks have been a bit quiet lately, I’m starting to wonder if I’m losing folks and should start wrapping this up…

Today, a short post about three related species that I worked with at one AZA facility with essentially identical husbandry – the black-crowned night heron, the yellow-crowned night heron, and the cattle egret.

No one ever seems to build an exhibit specifically for these species, and each of these birds was part of a mixed-species exhibit at our zoo. An advantage of this system is that it results in the birds have much larger exhibits than they might get if the enclosure was built for them alone – I enjoyed watching them fly the lengths of their aviaries on a regular basis as they moved from perch to perch.

upload_2025-5-15_9-45-45.png

A lone yellow-crowned night heron shared an exhibit with a wide variety of North American ducks – as the sole non-waterfowl in that exhibit, it occupied a plane of existence completely separate from the other birds. The exhibit was a series of pool in a long, thin aviary, with perching at various points along the perimeter. I rarely saw it on the ground of the exhibit, while the perching in the exhibit wasn’t well-suited for accommodating the perching ducks in the exhibit (such as wood ducks) so I never saw the birds interact. That may have been a shyness issue concerning keepers, though – whenever I did see the yellow-crown on the ground or at the pools, it was always either first thing in the morning, or when I was at the zoo late in the evening, when I was there after hours.

A pair of black-crowned night herons lived in a mixed exhibit with more ducks, as well as beavers, turtles, and a screech owl. A second pair of black-crowns, as well as a pair of cattle egrets, shared an aviary with a large pair of female American alligators, in one of the more unique mixed-species exhibits I’ve encountered. The exhibit was meant to replicate the natural tendency of these birds in the American south to build their nests over alligator-filled waters as a means of deterring predators from approaching their nests (visitors to St. Augustine Alligator Farm will have a very good idea of what I’m talking about, with wild birds instead of captive). This combination had been going on for several years before I started with no predation issues reported, though we did field lots of questions from visitors who thought that the birds were the gators’ food. I will say, I didn't see the alligator-exhibit birds on the ground nearly as often as I did the birds in the beaver exhibit, which I can only attribute to the alligators themselves.

upload_2025-5-15_9-44-44.png

Each species had a diet that consisted of Nebraska bird of prey (ground horse), chopped fish (smelt or capelin), and occasionally some hard-boiled egg or mealworms. We often fed the diets in the morning in the cooler months, but in the evening in the summer, so they weren’t sitting out in the sun, drying out and attracting flies (as with many birds, their appetites decrease with heat, and it wasn’t uncommon to find fly-covered bowls in the morning). Also, pro-tip – build a covered area for your meat-eating birds to have their diets kept. There are few zoo smells I find half as revolting as a night heron diet that’s been left outside on a summer night in a heavy rain. Diets were fed in hanging feeders to keep other species out of them (in the duck exhibit especially, if I put the bowl on the ground for even a second, the ducks would come charging over for the meat). In the beaver exhibit, the black-crowns would, in turn, steal mice for the screech owl if we weren’t careful. Black-crowns always struck me as much stronger and more robust than yellow-crowns, so maybe they just felt more confident in being jerks (by which I mean standing up for themselves).

Both species were kept outdoors year round with some supplemental heat lamps, though we did pull them in once for an unusually long period of bitter cold (in the case of the birds that lived with the alligators, we just pulled them into alligator winter holding. They were even safer inside than they were outside, the gators being fairly dormant in the winter, though cleaning their feces off the walls after they back outside was a major struggle).

The black-crowns and cattle egrets regularly built nests, and while they'd breed successfully in the past (most of them were actually born at our zoo, and the beaver exhibit night herons were the offspring of the alligator exhibit herons), we were not trying to raise anymore at the time of my employment, so eggs were pulled.

If you are a night heron keeper, you will have to resign yourself to a lot of comments from visitors who think that they are penguins, who will then get very confused should they see your bird either in flight or in a high-up perch. With the nocturnal nature of this species, it’s not a surprise that many visitors (especially those who aren’t too inclined to look for birds outside of a zoo) don’t recognize this fairly common species which is local to pretty much everywhere.

upload_2025-5-15_9-47-18.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-15_9-44-44.png
    upload_2025-5-15_9-44-44.png
    692 KB · Views: 97
  • upload_2025-5-15_9-45-45.png
    upload_2025-5-15_9-45-45.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 99
  • upload_2025-5-15_9-47-18.png
    upload_2025-5-15_9-47-18.png
    790.8 KB · Views: 100
Back
Top