So it looks as if,they will all stay but Jaka really should be breed.Before hand has Jaka produced any cubs?
BennettL
Jaka has not bred before, he is one of six siblings:
Nisha (F96) - died in 2006, never bred.
Rokan (M96) - died in 2016, never bred.
Malu (F96) - 2.1 cubs in 2000, 2.1 cubs in 2003.
Molek (F00) - 2.1 cubs in 2008
Mencari (F00) - speyed in 2011, never bred.
Malu's second litter (2003) has not bred and neither has Molek's litter (2008). Of Malu's first litter (all now deceased), one was sent to the UK to breed and another died in 2014 having never bred. The cubs, Setia, has two surviving cubs in the region and two grandcubs.
The reason Jaka is so valuable is because every generation accumulates more genetics.
Eg. Malu and Jaka are siblings...
Malu bred with Calang to produce a litter in 2000 (including Setia)
Setia bred with Hari to produce two litters in 2008 (including Sali)
Sali bred with Oz to produce a litter in 2014 (including Kembali)
Kembali is therefore related to Calang and all of his relations, Hari and all of his relations and Oz and all his relations. Jaka is not.