Onychorhynchus coronatus
Well-Known Member
Cotswold is a very good zoo, no question, but it is the categories that should determine who wins, not which zoo is better overall! I am one of ZSL's biggest critics on here, but in these categories even I think it wins, at least fairly comfortably.
Even in ex-situ / in-situ conservation output ? Shouldn't that be the ultimate litmus test ?
I'm not arguing that Cotswold does beat ZSL in that regard but rather what I am saying is does that criteria come into your considerations when you vote ?