Bronx Zoo Bronx Zoo review 2025

snowleopard

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Premium Member
Bronx Zoo review:

This is not going to be a definitive, comprehensive review of the Bronx Zoo, as I've done with hundreds of other zoo reviews, but instead a general overview because this is already a zoo that is well known on ZooChat. I visited the Bronx Zoo in 2008, and it was eerie to come back 17 years later, and my tour of the zoo's grounds was almost identical!

My biggest stressor beforehand was the time limits imposed by the zoo itself, as opening at 10 a.m. and closing at 5:00 p.m. meant that I had to show some pace in order to squeeze it all in within a single day. I was with my wife and therefore didn't make exhaustive lists of species in each building, as that would have meant a second day for sure. I still took a ton of photos and recently uploaded more than 120 images to this site. We saw everything except the animatronic dinosaurs (only a temporary summer display anyway), the butterflies and the budgies, which I would have likely skipped anyway. Boring. Everything else was seen, done and photographed by me and it was a wonderful day at a legendary zoo.

The zoo is able to be seen in a day, at a reasonable pace, by chunking it up into time slots and it worked out well on August 12th. We were first in line at the Asia Gate at 10:00 a.m. and we spent 30 minutes inside JungleWorld, then hit up the Wild Asia monorail right when it opened and that was approximately another 30 minutes. Then it was 30 minutes inside World of Darkness, 30 for Congo Gorilla Forest, 30 for lunch, 30 for the World of Reptiles, etc., and we left the zoo exactly 7 hours after we entered it.

Here are some cursory thoughts and highlights, in the order that we did the zoo:

JungleWorld - This has some spectacular moments (Gharials, the curving pathway, the different primates), but also some lows (Small-clawed Otters, Matschie's Tree Kangaroos and Malayan Tapirs all have puny enclosures). I loved seeing all the small jungle creatures represented, and it's good to see the Leopards are gone, but this building could use a slight renovation in places. It's very good, but with some obvious flaws.

Wild Asia Monorail - Seeing animals for seconds is of course always an issue for any zoo nerd, but the expansive exhibits make up for the speed of the ride. Other than the Asian Elephant and Red Panda enclosures, everything else is exemplary and the Markhor herd is impressive.

World of Darkness - A fun time was had by us in here, as Nocturnal Houses are such a rare sight these days. I saw every species except for the tarantula, which is a little alarming as some of the exhibits could be larger for their occupants. One of the Aye-ayes was badly pacing, wretchedly spinning round and round for ages, and the exhibit is quite narrow and so that was sad to see. Do the Sand Cats and Cacomistle have enough space? It's no Omaha or Frankfurt, but this is still a very good building and pretty much as I remembered it from 2008 except for the updated graphics. I particularly enjoyed the Broad-snouted Caiman exhibit with the mist wafting out into the swamp. Very cool.

African Plains - Lions is too small, Carter Giraffe House is the same because those Giraffes are inside for most of their lives, but the rest of the exhibits are all top-notch. The big Nyala field is gorgeous.

Congo Gorilla Forest - Still a classic exhibit, although I was a bit shocked at the copious amount of hotwire that is absolutely everywhere. Just like with JungleWorld, there's some megafauna and then a great representation of smaller critters, plus the educational component is wonderful. The signs and interpretative material throughout the zoo are world-class.

Pheasantry/Flamingos/Dancing Crane Cafe - Pheasants and other birds are solid, flamingos need to be netted, and the cafe is ultra-expensive for what you get. Very basic food offering, and the Somba Village Cafe (by the Geladas) was where we ate in 2008, but it was closed this time around.

Mouse House - A joy but of course a bit dated. Black and Rufous Giant Elephant Shrews in a small space, with several adjoining enclosures, is a highlight. The Northern Luzon Giant Cloud Rats are also a bit cramped, but the rest is delightful and how many zoos have a building such as this one? Long may it remain.

World of Reptiles - Pleasant enough but also showing signs of age much like every structure at the Bronx Zoo. Exhibits for the larger species (Cuban Crocodile, Dwarf Crocodile, Reticulated Python, Burmese Python, Green Anaconda) wouldn't look out of place at a roadside zoo in Arkansas or a privately-run Indonesian zoo, far below the Bronx's usual high quality, but the terrariums for smaller lizards and snakes are nicely landscaped.

Gelada Reserve/Himalayan Highlands/Dholes/Grizzlies/Tiger Mountain - All very solid exhibits. Gelada/Ibex/Rock Hyrax hillside enclosure is excellent, the Snow Leopard complex is superb, bears are just okay, Dholes tight on space, Tigers are terrific.

World of Birds - Better than I remembered it to be, especially the first floor. Lots of beautiful murals, brilliantly designed aviaries, and an older building that holds up nicely. Great Hornbills lack space, it was great to see an active Kagu, and I can fully understand why bird nerds adore this complex. It's no Singapore Bird Paradise, but nowhere else is.

Aquatic Bird House/Sea Bird Aviary/Birds of Prey - The house is not as strong as World of Birds, but much smellier! Sea Bird Aviary is packed with Inca Terns pooping everywhere and is an iconic structure. The Lesser Adjutant aviary is splendid. Birds of Prey a slight afterthought and not very memorable. It's a bit like the row of antiquated monkey cages near the Mouse House...they could be torn down and no one would complain.

Madagascar! - Better than I remembered it to be, with some outstanding landscaped exhibits. Lots of active animals, tainted a little by the Bronx Zoo TV series showing how the lemurs spend 17 hours a day in little, off-show metal cages. From a public viewpoint, it's all fantastic, but it's tough for me to compliment it too highly when I've seen huge outdoor lemur walk-throughs in European zoos that probably offer the animals a much better life.

Children's Zoo - Skipped this in 2008 (ran out of time!) and so it was great to tour it this time around. Lots of smaller creatures (Coatis, Squirrel Monkeys, North American Porcupines, Striped Skunks) and it's an okay experience without ever being anything more than average.

Zoo Center - Komodo Dragons, some monitor lizards, White Rhino exhibit, lots of historic architecture in this general area. A nostalgic zone and we watched the California Sea Lion feeding presentation in the late afternoon.

OVERALL:

It's kind of crazy that I visited Bronx Zoo in 2008 directly after Madagascar! opened and then I came back 17 years later just after World of Darkness reopened. The Rare Animal Range, Monkey House and Skyfari ride all closed in the interim, and so it was genuinely odd to stroll around a major zoo from open to close and it was nostalgic in many ways. It's probably fair to say that Bronx has regressed since then and the closure of those 3 attractions helped me squeeze everything into a single day.

If you look at Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, that place since 2008 has opened the Butterfly & Insect Pavilion, Skyfari, Expedition Madagascar, Scott Aquarium renovation, the enormous 28-acre African Grasslands, the Alaskan Waterpark, the 5-acre Children's Adventure Trails, Asian Highlands, Glacier Bay Landing, Sea Lion Shores, and even updated their Gorilla, Orangutan and Simmons Aviary complexes. It's like an entirely new zoo!

San Diego Zoo has opened (again since 2008) Elephant Odyssey, Outback, Africa Rocks, the enormous Bashor Bridge walkway, Reptile Walk, Komodo Kingdom, Hummingbird Habitat and added 80 species to the zoo after the opening of Wildlife Explorers Basecamp.

For me, my personal opinion from visiting more than 600+ zoos in my lifetime is that San Diego and Omaha are clearly the top two zoos in North America with no one else challenging them. Bronx and Saint Louis would be my next two, still excellent facilities but not at the same level as San Diego or Omaha.

I had an amazing day at the Bronx Zoo, and for my money it is clearly the #3 or #4 best zoo on the continent, but there is definitely a sign of stagnation. Is that too strong a word? JungleWorld, the Mouse House, World of Reptiles, the Children's Zoo (even with the renovation from around a decade ago), several of the aviaries here and there, etc., all need a little more TLC than they've received in recent years. It's such a great zoo, but a little freshening up in places wouldn't go amiss and for me to have almost an identical experience 17 years later is just not how a major zoo should be. I fully realize that it all comes down to funding, as the Wildlife Conservation Society has its hands full with 5 facilities and its conservation projects, but the Bronx Zoo could definitely use a lick of paint in a few zones and why not reopen the Monkey House as some kind of new complex as the next big addition?

Thoughts on my review?
 
Last edited:
I think I overall agree with your review, though I think it's a bit harsh on the otter and tree kangaroo exhibits, as while they aren't amazing, I find them average instead of being too small. The rest yeah, there can be a bit of TLC, but honestly I still think it's my favorite zoo, though I haven't been to Omaha or San Diego in more than a decade so I really need to go back. Each exhibit might have a few nitpicks in small exhibits, but there are so many amazing exhibits in each complex that they overshadow any complaints.
 
The zoo is able to be seen in a day, at a reasonable pace, by chunking it up into time slots and it worked out well on August 12th. We were first in line at the Asia Gate at 10:00 a.m. and we spent 30 minutes inside JungleWorld, then hit up the Wild Asia monorail right when it opened and that was approximately another 30 minutes. Then it was 30 minutes inside World of Darkness, 30 for Congo Gorilla Forest, 30 for lunch, 30 for the World of Reptiles, etc., and we left the zoo exactly 7 hours after we entered it.
Very interesting. I've been trying to plan a Bronx trip (now delayed) so this is useful to know. I am hoping to set aside multiple days anyway as I like being able to cover exhibits more than once but it's good to know it could all be done in one if necessary.

Wild Asia Monorail - Seeing animals for seconds is of course always an issue for any zoo nerd, but the expansive exhibits make up for the speed of the ride. Other than the Asian Elephant and Red Panda enclosures, everything else is exemplary and the Markhor herd is impressive.
What is wrong with this Red Panda enclosure? I'm not familiar with this one.

Madagascar! - Better than I remembered it to be, with some outstanding landscaped exhibits. Lots of active animals, tainted a little by the Bronx Zoo TV series showing how the lemurs spend 17 hours a day in little, off-show metal cages. From a public viewpoint, it's all fantastic, but it's tough for me to compliment it too highly when I've seen huge outdoor lemur walk-throughs in European zoos that probably offer the animals a much better life.
I am particularly glad that you had a better time in this exhibit on this go-around as I knew you were not a fan of it.

It's kind of crazy that I visited Bronx Zoo in 2008 directly after Madagascar! opened and then I came back 17 years later just after World of Darkness reopened. The Rare Animal Range, Monkey House and Skyfari ride all closed in the interim, and so it was genuinely odd to stroll around a major zoo from open to close and it was nostalgic in many ways. It's probably fair to say that Bronx has regressed since then and the closure of those 3 attractions helped me squeeze everything into a single day.
What were your thoughts on the Rare Animal Range and Monkey House on your previous visit? Do you remember them fondly?

If you look at Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, that place since 2008 has opened the Butterfly & Insect Pavilion, Skyfari, Expedition Madagascar, Scott Aquarium renovation, the enormous 28-acre African Grasslands, the Alaskan Waterpark, the 5-acre Children's Adventure Trails, Asian Highlands, Glacier Bay Landing, Sea Lion Shores, and even updated their Gorilla, Orangutan and Simmons Aviary complexes. It's like an entirely new zoo!
Very well said here! This list includes probably three-quarters of the facility; the zoo has been able to reinvent itself almost completely, and I think this is a huge reason it can maintain its dominance as one of the country's top zoos. While some zoos have spent much of this period struggling and unable to develop more than one or two new exhibits, Omaha has been able to reinvent almost the entire campus in this time, and made some smart updates to its older structures, and is still exploring a half-dozen future projects such as North America expansions and a renovation to Lied Jungle, showing no sign of slowing down.

I had an amazing day at the Bronx Zoo, and for my money it is clearly the #3 or #4 best zoo on the continent, but there is definitely a sign of stagnation. Is that too strong a word? JungleWorld, the Mouse House, World of Reptiles, the Children's Zoo (even with the renovation from around a decade ago), several of the aviaries here and there, etc., all need a little more TLC than they've received in recent years. It's such a great zoo, but a little freshening up in places wouldn't go amiss and for me to have almost an identical experience 17 years later is just not how a major zoo should be. I fully realize that it all comes down to funding, as the Wildlife Conservation Society has its hands full with 5 facilities and its conservation projects, but the Bronx Zoo could definitely use a lick of paint in a few zones and why not reopen the Monkey House as some kind of new complex as the next big addition?
There are lots of words I can consider harsh when judging zoos, but I think "stagnation" is an appropriate word, and it is not the only zoo affected. While the zoo is about to turn a dramatic page, many would agree that Brookfield stagnated for fifteen years (from 2010 until 2025) and I think it would be not controversial to say Minnesota has been suffering a period of stagnation as well, although there are rumblings of a step in a positive direction there as well. Milwaukee has had developments but also looks to be on the cusp of more serious change in the future. I'm hopeful that WoD's reopening will also be a first step and an opportunity for WCS to turn a new page.
 
Bronx Zoo review:

This is not going to be a definitive, comprehensive review of the Bronx Zoo, as I've done with hundreds of other zoo reviews, but instead a general overview because this is already a zoo that is well known on ZooChat. I visited the Bronx Zoo in 2008, and it was eerie to come back 17 years later, and my tour of the zoo's grounds was almost identical!

My biggest stressor beforehand was the time limits imposed by the zoo itself, as opening at 10 a.m. and closing at 5:00 p.m. meant that I had to show some pace in order to squeeze it all in within a single day. I was with my wife and therefore didn't make exhaustive lists of species in each building, as that would have meant a second day for sure. I still took a ton of photos and recently uploaded more than 120 images to this site. We saw everything except the animatronic dinosaurs (only a temporary summer display anyway), the butterflies and the budgies, which I would have likely skipped anyway. Boring. Everything else was seen, done and photographed by me and it was a wonderful day at a legendary zoo.

The zoo is able to be seen in a day, at a reasonable pace, by chunking it up into time slots and it worked out well on August 12th. We were first in line at the Asia Gate at 10:00 a.m. and we spent 30 minutes inside JungleWorld, then hit up the Wild Asia monorail right when it opened and that was approximately another 30 minutes. Then it was 30 minutes inside World of Darkness, 30 for Congo Gorilla Forest, 30 for lunch, 30 for the World of Reptiles, etc., and we left the zoo exactly 7 hours after we entered it.

Here are some cursory thoughts and highlights, in the order that we did the zoo:

JungleWorld - This has some spectacular moments (Gharials, the curving pathway, the different primates), but also some lows (Small-clawed Otters, Matschie's Tree Kangaroos and Malayan Tapirs all have puny enclosures). I loved seeing all the small jungle creatures represented, and it's good to see the Leopards are gone, but this building could use a slight renovation in places. It's very good, but with some obvious flaws.

Wild Asia Monorail - Seeing animals for seconds is of course always an issue for any zoo nerd, but the expansive exhibits make up for the speed of the ride. Other than the Asian Elephant and Red Panda enclosures, everything else is exemplary and the Markhor herd is impressive.

World of Darkness - A fun time was had by us in here, as Nocturnal Houses are such a rare sight these days. I saw every species except for the tarantula, which is a little alarming as some of the exhibits could be larger for their occupants. One of the Aye-ayes was badly pacing, wretchedly spinning round and round for ages, and the exhibit is quite narrow and so that was sad to see. Do the Sand Cats and Cacomistle have enough space? It's no Omaha or Frankfurt, but this is still a very good building and pretty much as I remembered it from 2008 except for the updated graphics. I particularly enjoyed the Broad-snouted Caiman exhibit with the mist wafting out into the swamp. Very cool.

African Plains - Lions is too small, Carter Giraffe House is the same because those Giraffes are inside for most of their lives, but the rest of the exhibits are all top-notch. The big Nyala field is gorgeous.

Congo Gorilla Forest - Still a classic exhibit, although I was a bit shocked at the copious amount of hotwire that is absolutely everywhere. Just like with JungleWorld, there's some megafauna and then a great representation of smaller critters, plus the educational component is wonderful. The signs and interpretative material throughout the zoo are world-class.

Pheasantry/Flamingos/Dancing Crane Cafe - Pheasants and other birds are solid, flamingos need to be netted, and the cafe is ultra-expensive for what you get. Very basic food offering, and the Somba Village Cafe (by the Geladas) was where we ate in 2008, but it was closed this time around.

Mouse House - A joy but of course a bit dated. Black and Rufous Giant Elephant Shrews in a small space, with several adjoining enclosures, is a highlight. The Northern Luzon Giant Cloud Rats are also a bit cramped, but the rest is delightful and how many zoos have a building such as this one? Long may it remain.

World of Reptiles - Pleasant enough but also showing signs of age much like every structure at the Bronx Zoo. Exhibits for the larger species (Cuban Crocodile, Dwarf Crocodile, Reticulated Python, Burmese Python, Green Anaconda) wouldn't look out of place at a roadside zoo in Arkansas or a privately-run Indonesian zoo, far below the Bronx's usual high quality, but the terrariums for smaller lizards and snakes are nicely landscaped.

Gelada Reserve/Himalayan Highlands/Dholes/Grizzlies/Tiger Mountain - All very solid exhibits. Gelada/Ibex/Rock Hyrax hillside enclosure is excellent, the Snow Leopard complex is superb, bears are just okay, Dholes tight on space, Tigers are terrific.

World of Birds - Better than I remembered it to be, especially the first floor. Lots of beautiful murals, brilliantly designed aviaries, and an older building that holds up nicely. Great Hornbills lack space, it was great to see an active Kagu, and I can fully understand why bird nerds adore this complex. It's no Singapore Bird Paradise, but nowhere else is.

Aquatic Bird House/Sea Bird Aviary/Birds of Prey - The house is not as strong as World of Birds, but much smellier! Sea Bird Aviary is packed with Inca Terns pooping everywhere and is an iconic structure. The Lesser Adjutant aviary is splendid. Birds of Prey a slight afterthought and not very memorable. It's a bit like the row of antiquated monkey cages near the Mouse House...they could be torn down and no one would complain.

Madagascar! - Better than I remembered it to be, with some outstanding landscaped exhibits. Lots of active animals, tainted a little by the Bronx Zoo TV series showing how the lemurs spend 17 hours a day in little, off-show metal cages. From a public viewpoint, it's all fantastic, but it's tough for me to compliment it too highly when I've seen huge outdoor lemur walk-throughs in European zoos that probably offer the animals a much better life.

Children's Zoo - Skipped this in 2008 (ran out of time!) and so it was great to tour it this time around. Lots of smaller creatures (Coatis, Squirrel Monkeys, North American Porcupines, Striped Skunks) and it's an okay experience without ever being anything more than average.

Zoo Center - Komodo Dragons, some monitor lizards, White Rhino exhibit, lots of historic architecture in this general area. A nostalgic zone and we watched the California Sea Lion feeding presentation in the late afternoon.

OVERALL:

It's kind of crazy that I visited Bronx Zoo in 2008 directly after Madagascar! opened and then I came back 17 years later just after World of Darkness reopened. The Rare Animal Range, Monkey House and Skyfari ride all closed in the interim, and so it was genuinely odd to stroll around a major zoo from open to close and it was nostalgic in many ways. It's probably fair to say that Bronx has regressed since then and the closure of those 3 attractions helped me squeeze everything into a single day.

If you look at Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, that place since 2008 has opened the Butterfly & Insect Pavilion, Skyfari, Expedition Madagascar, Scott Aquarium renovation, the enormous 28-acre African Grasslands, the Alaskan Waterpark, the 5-acre Children's Adventure Trails, Asian Highlands, Glacier Bay Landing, Sea Lion Shores, and even updated their Gorilla, Orangutan and Simmons Aviary complexes. It's like an entirely new zoo!

San Diego Zoo has opened (again since 2008) Elephant Odyssey, Outback, Africa Rocks, the enormous Bashor Bridge walkway, Reptile Walk, Komodo Kingdom, Hummingbird Habitat and added 80 species to the zoo after the opening of Wildlife Explorers Basecamp.

For me, my personal opinion from visiting more than 600+ zoos in my lifetime is that San Diego and Omaha are clearly the top two zoos in North America with no one else challenging them. Bronx and Saint Louis would be my next two, still excellent facilities but not at the same level as San Diego or Omaha.

I had an amazing day at the Bronx Zoo, and for my money it is clearly the #3 or #4 best zoo on the continent, but there is definitely a sign of stagnation. Is that too strong a word? JungleWorld, the Mouse House, World of Reptiles, the Children's Zoo (even with the renovation from around a decade ago), several of the aviaries here and there, etc., all need a little more TLC than they've received in recent years. It's such a great zoo, but a little freshening up in places wouldn't go amiss and for me to have almost an identical experience 17 years later is just not how a major zoo should be. I fully realize that it all comes down to funding, as the Wildlife Conservation Society has its hands full with 5 facilities and its conservation projects, but the Bronx Zoo could definitely use a lick of paint in a few zones and why not reopen the Monkey House as some kind of new complex as the next big addition?

Thoughts on my review?
While the Bronx is still my favorite zoo (although I’ve still never made the trek to San Diego or Omaha,) I do agree it has been pretty stagnate. I’m hoping that in the next 15 years they are able to pick up the pace (hopefully the WCS doesn’t need to do major renovations on their sister facilities after a flood again :p) I also agree that there are many subpar exhibits, however now that the Leopard is gone I believe that exhibits for animals such as the Gorillas, Tigers, Geladas, Asian Hoofstock, and much more outshine the bad ones. I also generally agree with the feeling of nostalgia I get from the zoo and honestly I haven’t really though about it before. A majority of the zoo has remained unchanged with some minor renovations since I was a kid with the only major change being the fact the Polar Bear is gone, and I don’t get that same feeling of nostalgia at any other zoo, including Bergen County and Turtle Back, both of which have changed a lot since I was little, the latter especially.
 
Did you see the fat-tailed dwarf lemurs in World of Darkness as well? I'm just curious because you said you saw every species except for the tarantula, and some other people seemed to be saying the dwarf lemurs weren't on exhibit yet.
 
It's gratifying to see so many questions and comments, along with 500+ "likes" and remarks on the photos I uploaded. The Bronx Zoo is a hot topic on this forum. ;)

Time to answer some questions:

I had zero plans for any kind of zoo trip this summer, but out of the blue my sister-in-law offered to come out to British Columbia (from Alberta) and watch our 4 kids for a week. Almost immediately I began planning a trip to New York City and my wife and I had an amazing, kid-free vacation where we saw more than 15 ticketed attractions and walked 20,000 steps every day. It was epic. We ended up visiting all 5 Wildlife Conservation Society zoos, so we completed the set. Bronx Zoo was an open to close type day (7 hours) on August 12th, Queens Zoo was literally one hour and done on August 13th, and on August 15th it was two hours at New York Aquarium in the morning, lunch on the brilliant Coney Island boardwalk, one hour at Prospect Park Zoo in the early afternoon and 1.5 hours at Central Park Zoo before leaving that place when it closed at 5:00 p.m. The NYC subway system is fast and efficient, and we rode the subway everywhere all week long. I was obviously with my wife and so I didn't take exhaustive lists of species or go at an ultra-slow zoo nerd's pace, plus these zoos are all very well covered on ZooChat anyway.

I had been to Bronx Zoo once before (2008), Central Park Zoo once before (2008), New York Aquarium once before (2012), but both Queens Zoo and Prospect Park Zoo were first-time visits, and they were zoos #611 and #612 all-time. I've also toured the Long Island Aquarium (2012), but Staten Island Zoo is one I've never been to before and it's the most awkward to visit due to its geographical location.

If someone is reading this and planning to tour Bronx Zoo for the first time and make lists of species or count how many exhibits are in a particular area, then forget the idea of seeing it all in one day. However, it was great to stroll around with my wife and not have to take many notes and it is clearly possible to see everything if one breaks things up into 30-minute increments and stays on schedule. Hopefully my chronological itinerary of how I toured the zoo is helpful, but it's important to stay on task and keep momentum going while at the zoo as we all know that Bronx's hours of operation are totally ridiculous. ;)

I remember the Rare Animal Range being a large amount of space for species such as Axis Deer, Guanaco, maybe some American Bison, etc. It's not a huge miss for the average visitor, just like the Skyfari and outdated cages inside the Monkey House, but it's still a sore point that the Bronx Zoo has regressed from my first visit in 2008. Usually, any kind of closure in a zoo is something to lament. Omaha has spent in the neighbourhood of $250 million on new exhibits since 2008 and San Diego has also spent around $250 million in the same time period, while Bronx has spent (*checks notes) almost nothing. San Diego and Omaha are now a whole level above Bronx in my opinion. Sometimes vast expenditures on new exhibits at zoos doesn't guarantee universal love, as otherwise Pairi Daiza and Beauval would be the two most popular zoos in Europe for nerds, but at least there's a sign of progress while Bronx is looking a little dusty in many corners. It's a much better zoo than Brookfield, but that's still an appropriate comparison as both have been stagnant for a very long time.

I'm not a fan of the Red Panda exhibit in Wild Asia as it's directly next to the rattling, noisy monorail and seems an odd place for such a species.

@blospz and @NSU42 were a big help with the list of species for World of Darkness and here's the breakdown of the 21 exhibits. The Nocturnal House is very similar to how it was in 2008 (just like pretty much the entire zoo!) and the animals were very easy to see on my visit.

Exhibit 1: Red-rumped Agouti, Hoffmann's Two-toed Sloth and Nancy Ma's Douroucouli.
Exhibit 2: Emperor Scorpion
Exhibit 3: Gray Mouse Lemur
Exhibit 4: Southern Lesser Galago
Exhibit 5: Northern Luzon Giant Cloud Rat (the zoo has FOUR exhibits for this species in THREE different buildings!)
Exhibit 6: Pygmy Slow Loris
Exhibit 7: Blind Cave Fish
Exhibit 8: Broad-snouted Caiman - my favorite exhibit
Exhibit 9: South American Pinktoe Tarantula - didn't see
Exhibit 10: Northern Cacomistle
Exhibit 11: Timor Python and Blood Python
Exhibit 12: Texas Blind Salamander
Exhibit 13: Egyptian Fruit Bat
Exhibit 14: Aye-aye (I did not see any Fat-tailed Dwarf Lemurs and I'm guessing this species is still not on exhibit. I did see two Aye-ayes, with one badly pacing)
Exhibit 15: Sand Cat
Exhibit 16: Naked Mole Rat
Exhibit 17: Guatemalan Beaded Lizard
Exhibit 18: Nine-banded Armadillo
Exhibit 19: Vampire Bat
Exhibit 20: Seba's Short-tailed Bat
Exhibit 21: New Caledonian Giant Gecko
 
Omaha has spent in the neighbourhood of $250 million on new exhibits since 2008 and San Diego has also spent around $250 million in the same time period, while Bronx has spent (*checks notes) almost nothing.
To be fair to the Bronx, the WCS did spend around $250 million on the Aquarium after Sandy. ($158 million on Ocean Wonders: Sharks, an estimated $80 million on Sea Cliffs, and I’m sure much more on the rest of the aquarium.)
 
To be fair to the Bronx, the WCS did spend around $250 million on the Aquarium after Sandy. ($158 million on Ocean Wonders: Sharks, an estimated $80 million on Sea Cliffs, and I’m sure much more on the rest of the aquarium.)
But where are the walrus? A cornerstone of the collection that has been there since its opening in 1957 - when exhibited both Atlantic and Pacific sub species .
The reacquainted the Belugas as well and the fur seals
Not having walrus - the signatures species- is unacceptable to any member
 
It's gratifying to see so many questions and comments, along with 500+ "likes" and remarks on the photos I uploaded. The Bronx Zoo is a hot topic on this forum. ;)

Time to answer some questions:

I had zero plans for any kind of zoo trip this summer, but out of the blue my sister-in-law offered to come out to British Columbia (from Alberta) and watch our 4 kids for a week. Almost immediately I began planning a trip to New York City and my wife and I had an amazing, kid-free vacation where we saw more than 15 ticketed attractions and walked 20,000 steps every day. It was epic. We ended up visiting all 5 Wildlife Conservation Society zoos, so we completed the set. Bronx Zoo was an open to close type day (7 hours) on August 12th, Queens Zoo was literally one hour and done on August 13th, and on August 15th it was two hours at New York Aquarium in the morning, lunch on the brilliant Coney Island boardwalk, one hour at Prospect Park Zoo in the early afternoon and 1.5 hours at Central Park Zoo before leaving that place when it closed at 5:00 p.m. The NYC subway system is fast and efficient, and we rode the subway everywhere all week long. I was obviously with my wife and so I didn't take exhaustive lists of species or go at an ultra-slow zoo nerd's pace, plus these zoos are all very well covered on ZooChat anyway.

I had been to Bronx Zoo once before (2008), Central Park Zoo once before (2008), New York Aquarium once before (2012), but both Queens Zoo and Prospect Park Zoo were first-time visits, and they were zoos #611 and #612 all-time. I've also toured the Long Island Aquarium (2012), but Staten Island Zoo is one I've never been to before and it's the most awkward to visit due to its geographical location.

If someone is reading this and planning to tour Bronx Zoo for the first time and make lists of species or count how many exhibits are in a particular area, then forget the idea of seeing it all in one day. However, it was great to stroll around with my wife and not have to take many notes and it is clearly possible to see everything if one breaks things up into 30-minute increments and stays on schedule. Hopefully my chronological itinerary of how I toured the zoo is helpful, but it's important to stay on task and keep momentum going while at the zoo as we all know that Bronx's hours of operation are totally ridiculous. ;)

I remember the Rare Animal Range being a large amount of space for species such as Axis Deer, Guanaco, maybe some American Bison, etc. It's not a huge miss for the average visitor, just like the Skyfari and outdated cages inside the Monkey House, but it's still a sore point that the Bronx Zoo has regressed from my first visit in 2008. Usually, any kind of closure in a zoo is something to lament. Omaha has spent in the neighbourhood of $250 million on new exhibits since 2008 and San Diego has also spent around $250 million in the same time period, while Bronx has spent (*checks notes) almost nothing. San Diego and Omaha are now a whole level above Bronx in my opinion. Sometimes vast expenditures on new exhibits at zoos doesn't guarantee universal love, as otherwise Pairi Daiza and Beauval would be the two most popular zoos in Europe for nerds, but at least there's a sign of progress while Bronx is looking a little dusty in many corners. It's a much better zoo than Brookfield, but that's still an appropriate comparison as both have been stagnant for a very long time.

I'm not a fan of the Red Panda exhibit in Wild Asia as it's directly next to the rattling, noisy monorail and seems an odd place for such a species.

@blospz and @NSU42 were a big help with the list of species for World of Darkness and here's the breakdown of the 21 exhibits. The Nocturnal House is very similar to how it was in 2008 (just like pretty much the entire zoo!) and the animals were very easy to see on my visit.

Exhibit 1: Red-rumped Agouti, Hoffmann's Two-toed Sloth and Nancy Ma's Douroucouli.
Exhibit 2: Emperor Scorpion
Exhibit 3: Gray Mouse Lemur
Exhibit 4: Southern Lesser Galago
Exhibit 5: Northern Luzon Giant Cloud Rat (the zoo has FOUR exhibits for this species in THREE different buildings!)
Exhibit 6: Pygmy Slow Loris
Exhibit 7: Blind Cave Fish
Exhibit 8: Broad-snouted Caiman - my favorite exhibit
Exhibit 9: South American Pinktoe Tarantula - didn't see
Exhibit 10: Northern Cacomistle
Exhibit 11: Timor Python and Blood Python
Exhibit 12: Texas Blind Salamander
Exhibit 13: Egyptian Fruit Bat
Exhibit 14: Aye-aye (I did not see any Fat-tailed Dwarf Lemurs and I'm guessing this species is still not on exhibit. I did see two Aye-ayes, with one badly pacing)
Exhibit 15: Sand Cat
Exhibit 16: Naked Mole Rat
Exhibit 17: Guatemalan Beaded Lizard
Exhibit 18: Nine-banded Armadillo
Exhibit 19: Vampire Bat
Exhibit 20: Seba's Short-tailed Bat
Exhibit 21: New Caledonian Giant Gecko
In its original incarnation the RARE animal range housed Pete David deer - now moved to the former Roosevelt Elk range (The elk are now displayed at the Quuens Zoo , which specializes in Nearctic species) , Prezwalsky horses (Currently in Wild Asia) and Wisent ( European bison )-which are no longer part of any WCS collection .
Then Formosa Sika deer were moved in .
They were transported to Wild Asia.
Guanaco had previously there after being transferred from a prior South American exhibit - now Congo- that held South American tapir, white lipped peccary, Brocket deer - none, of which, are currently displayed in any WCS facility - although POZ could easily absorb tapir and Queens’ zoo , which is transitioning to an, Americas Zoo - now displaying Chacoan peccary, pudu and Andean bear - could - and should- absorb guanaco , tapir and Rhea - into a South American exhibit by transforming their current “livestock” ( farm) exhibit into a Neo Tropical zoogeographic zone to include the much vaunted but never realized jaguar exhibit permanent housing for reptiles and amphibians
 
Those are good points @KiwiBirb and @AnActualFan in terms of the Wildlife Conservation Society spending a fortune on Ocean Wonders: Sharks! (I just uploaded a lot of photos of that complex into the gallery), Sea Cliffs and the 2023 flood at Prospect Park Zoo. Much of the work on Sea Cliffs was essentially damage control, as the actual 6 exhibits are basically identical to how they were when I visited in 2012 except for some updated graphics. To be honest, the whole Sea Cliffs complex at New York Aquarium has regressed as while there are now California Sea Lions, Harbour Seals, Sea Otters and African Penguins, back in 2012 those same 4 species were present alongside Northern Fur Seals and Pacific Walruses. A far superior lineup! As @Don Majeski points out, the loss of the walruses is particularly disappointing.

The Wildlife Conservation Society is obviously spread too thin, as it's been 17 years since a major exhibit (Madagascar!) opened at Bronx Zoo and even Central Park Zoo (other than Snow Leopards), Prospect Park Zoo and Queens Zoo have hardly been altered in 30+ years. The sharks building at New York Aquarium is terrific, but between that and the Hurricane Sandy repairs, there's been nothing left to spend elsewhere. It's frustrating for all of us on this site.

Omaha's $250 million on new exhibits since 2008 doesn't even include all the big buildings constructed before that time period, plus the zoo is currently working on a master plan that will likely be another $250 million over the next decade. That zoo hardly pauses to catch its breath. And San Diego's $250 million spent since 2008 doesn't include the vast sums of money spent at the San Diego Zoo Safari Park in the shape of Tiger Trail ($20 million), Walkabout Australia ($17 million) and 2026's Elephant Valley (which is an enormous project). San Diego Wildlife Alliance and Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo are focused and driven and have dramatically improved their respective zoos and vast sums of funding are required for such modernization.
 
Last edited:
Omaha's $250 million on new exhibits since 2008 doesn't even include all the big buildings constructed before that time period, plus the zoo is currently working on a master plan that will likely be another $250 million over the next decade. That zoo hardly pauses to catch its breath. And San Diego's $250 million spent since 2008 doesn't include the vast sums of money spent at the San Diego Zoo Safari Park in the shape of Tiger Trail ($20 million), Walkabout Australia ($17 million) and 2026's Elephant Valley (which is an enormous project). San Diego Wildlife Alliance and Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo are focused and driven and have dramatically improved their respective zoos and vast sums of funding are required for such modernization.
Will point out that it's probably much easier to spend this money in Omaha and San Diego than in New York, as construction costs are much higher in NYC than anywhere else in America. Not to mention San Diego, even with all of its improvements, has some glaring flaws (Lions in Elephant Odyssey and all of Urban Jungle).
 
@snowleopard I originally thought some of your criticisms and comparisons were a bit harsh, but was then pleasantly surprised when you ended by saying it was a Top 5 zoo still in your opinion. I live in Brooklyn, am a WCS member, go to the Bronx Zoo regularly, and have been to 350+ zoos at this point (over 300 in the US) and I'm not sure I would rate it that highly. Don't get me wrong, the Bronx is an outstanding zoo and definitely belongs in the conversation still, but you seem to place it in the Top 5 with quite a bit of ease. I agree with your Top 3 (but I think our placements of Omaha and San Diego are switched), but I'm not sure I would follow them up by the Bronx. I have not been to Columbus yet (will be going in the next two weeks finally!), so I can't comment on the other zoo you often have in your Top 5, but I have been to Houston twice now (my last visit was May of this year) and I think it absolutely belongs in this conversation and I would likely put it above the Bronx.

I have been to all of these zoos within last 6-7 months, so have pretty much seen them all in their most recent iterations. I was at San Diego in February, Houston in May, my last visit to the Bronx was in July, I was at St. Louis on Friday and Omaha yesterday. The Bronx is still in my Top 5 for now, but I'm not sure it will remain so after my visit to Columbus in a couple weeks.

Admittedly, I think you have spent way more time than myself meticulously thinking about this question than I have and this conversation is highly subjective as it is.
 
Much of the problem with the New York zoos is a total lack of cohesive civic pride by New York City government but, mostly, by its citizens.
They are a transient population who are more concerned with their racial and ethnic identities - stressed by the politicians who benefit from exploiting this - rather being Gothsmites.
NYC has a budget of around $134,000,000 ,000 and spends, comparably , nothing on cultural institutions .
Four solutions :
1. The largest single industry and revenue source - aside from real estate tax - in NYC is tourism which is fueled by cultural institutions .
The NYC government spends less than 1/2% on cultural affairs .
It shlukd spend 5% ($6 billion) of our tax dollars on cultural institutions - with ,at least,$100,000,000 of our tax dollars , on Living Institutions .
2. Increase revenues you must increase attendance .
There is no advertising - not even markers - at the subway stations serving the Queens and Prospect Park zoos
Horrible marketing, deplorable
Both zoos are stagnant .
No local interest. None
Staten Island is really neglected by NYC government .
3. The aquarium should be separately funded
4. WCS and SIZS needs to drastically increase its membership
Per capita far less than any other cities in the USA compared to population
To me members are tantamount to shareholders - which, perhaps, they should be.
Thus, if members (zealots) want African elephants in the Bronx, walrus in Coney Island, Orangutan in Central Park, an Australasian rain forest in Prospect Park and jaguars , guanaco and a permanent collection of hero’s in Queens -wart hog and spider monkeys , red wolves in SI- they should get them .
5 In my lifetime -a l-o-n-g one- I have never known a bond issue raised to specifically support the zoos of NYC.
Many cities and counties have done this

6. When the demolished the old menageries in Central Park and Prospect Parks and replaced them with those WOA zoos in the 1939s ( Mid depression ) they took a poll asking g the public what animals the wanted to see. THAT is why they displayed elephants, Bile hippos, rhinos, polar bears, asiatic black bears, orangutan, gorillas, tigers , leopards and jaguars and NOT porcupines.
The problem, of course, were the horrendous, dungeon like conditions they were exhibited in.
They needed larger areas to exhibit what they wanted in these free zoos.
Maybe 8 large species instead of 49 smaller ones
If you do not progress you regress
One needs the money, the will and a direction
More zealots willing to put their money whether mouths are. Political will of the perennially apathetic. Wow factors in each institution
 
Bronx Zoo review:

This is not going to be a definitive, comprehensive review of the Bronx Zoo, as I've done with hundreds of other zoo reviews, but instead a general overview because this is already a zoo that is well known on ZooChat. I visited the Bronx Zoo in 2008, and it was eerie to come back 17 years later, and my tour of the zoo's grounds was almost identical!

My biggest stressor beforehand was the time limits imposed by the zoo itself, as opening at 10 a.m. and closing at 5:00 p.m. meant that I had to show some pace in order to squeeze it all in within a single day. I was with my wife and therefore didn't make exhaustive lists of species in each building, as that would have meant a second day for sure. I still took a ton of photos and recently uploaded more than 120 images to this site. We saw everything except the animatronic dinosaurs (only a temporary summer display anyway), the butterflies and the budgies, which I would have likely skipped anyway. Boring. Everything else was seen, done and photographed by me and it was a wonderful day at a legendary zoo.

The zoo is able to be seen in a day, at a reasonable pace, by chunking it up into time slots and it worked out well on August 12th. We were first in line at the Asia Gate at 10:00 a.m. and we spent 30 minutes inside JungleWorld, then hit up the Wild Asia monorail right when it opened and that was approximately another 30 minutes. Then it was 30 minutes inside World of Darkness, 30 for Congo Gorilla Forest, 30 for lunch, 30 for the World of Reptiles, etc., and we left the zoo exactly 7 hours after we entered it.

Here are some cursory thoughts and highlights, in the order that we did the zoo:

JungleWorld - This has some spectacular moments (Gharials, the curving pathway, the different primates), but also some lows (Small-clawed Otters, Matschie's Tree Kangaroos and Malayan Tapirs all have puny enclosures). I loved seeing all the small jungle creatures represented, and it's good to see the Leopards are gone, but this building could use a slight renovation in places. It's very good, but with some obvious flaws.

Wild Asia Monorail - Seeing animals for seconds is of course always an issue for any zoo nerd, but the expansive exhibits make up for the speed of the ride. Other than the Asian Elephant and Red Panda enclosures, everything else is exemplary and the Markhor herd is impressive.

World of Darkness - A fun time was had by us in here, as Nocturnal Houses are such a rare sight these days. I saw every species except for the tarantula, which is a little alarming as some of the exhibits could be larger for their occupants. One of the Aye-ayes was badly pacing, wretchedly spinning round and round for ages, and the exhibit is quite narrow and so that was sad to see. Do the Sand Cats and Cacomistle have enough space? It's no Omaha or Frankfurt, but this is still a very good building and pretty much as I remembered it from 2008 except for the updated graphics. I particularly enjoyed the Broad-snouted Caiman exhibit with the mist wafting out into the swamp. Very cool.

African Plains - Lions is too small, Carter Giraffe House is the same because those Giraffes are inside for most of their lives, but the rest of the exhibits are all top-notch. The big Nyala field is gorgeous.

Congo Gorilla Forest - Still a classic exhibit, although I was a bit shocked at the copious amount of hotwire that is absolutely everywhere. Just like with JungleWorld, there's some megafauna and then a great representation of smaller critters, plus the educational component is wonderful. The signs and interpretative material throughout the zoo are world-class.

Pheasantry/Flamingos/Dancing Crane Cafe - Pheasants and other birds are solid, flamingos need to be netted, and the cafe is ultra-expensive for what you get. Very basic food offering, and the Somba Village Cafe (by the Geladas) was where we ate in 2008, but it was closed this time around.

Mouse House - A joy but of course a bit dated. Black and Rufous Giant Elephant Shrews in a small space, with several adjoining enclosures, is a highlight. The Northern Luzon Giant Cloud Rats are also a bit cramped, but the rest is delightful and how many zoos have a building such as this one? Long may it remain.

World of Reptiles - Pleasant enough but also showing signs of age much like every structure at the Bronx Zoo. Exhibits for the larger species (Cuban Crocodile, Dwarf Crocodile, Reticulated Python, Burmese Python, Green Anaconda) wouldn't look out of place at a roadside zoo in Arkansas or a privately-run Indonesian zoo, far below the Bronx's usual high quality, but the terrariums for smaller lizards and snakes are nicely landscaped.

Gelada Reserve/Himalayan Highlands/Dholes/Grizzlies/Tiger Mountain - All very solid exhibits. Gelada/Ibex/Rock Hyrax hillside enclosure is excellent, the Snow Leopard complex is superb, bears are just okay, Dholes tight on space, Tigers are terrific.

World of Birds - Better than I remembered it to be, especially the first floor. Lots of beautiful murals, brilliantly designed aviaries, and an older building that holds up nicely. Great Hornbills lack space, it was great to see an active Kagu, and I can fully understand why bird nerds adore this complex. It's no Singapore Bird Paradise, but nowhere else is.

Aquatic Bird House/Sea Bird Aviary/Birds of Prey - The house is not as strong as World of Birds, but much smellier! Sea Bird Aviary is packed with Inca Terns pooping everywhere and is an iconic structure. The Lesser Adjutant aviary is splendid. Birds of Prey a slight afterthought and not very memorable. It's a bit like the row of antiquated monkey cages near the Mouse House...they could be torn down and no one would complain.

Madagascar! - Better than I remembered it to be, with some outstanding landscaped exhibits. Lots of active animals, tainted a little by the Bronx Zoo TV series showing how the lemurs spend 17 hours a day in little, off-show metal cages. From a public viewpoint, it's all fantastic, but it's tough for me to compliment it too highly when I've seen huge outdoor lemur walk-throughs in European zoos that probably offer the animals a much better life.

Children's Zoo - Skipped this in 2008 (ran out of time!) and so it was great to tour it this time around. Lots of smaller creatures (Coatis, Squirrel Monkeys, North American Porcupines, Striped Skunks) and it's an okay experience without ever being anything more than average.

Zoo Center - Komodo Dragons, some monitor lizards, White Rhino exhibit, lots of historic architecture in this general area. A nostalgic zone and we watched the California Sea Lion feeding presentation in the late afternoon.

OVERALL:

It's kind of crazy that I visited Bronx Zoo in 2008 directly after Madagascar! opened and then I came back 17 years later just after World of Darkness reopened. The Rare Animal Range, Monkey House and Skyfari ride all closed in the interim, and so it was genuinely odd to stroll around a major zoo from open to close and it was nostalgic in many ways. It's probably fair to say that Bronx has regressed since then and the closure of those 3 attractions helped me squeeze everything into a single day.

If you look at Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, that place since 2008 has opened the Butterfly & Insect Pavilion, Skyfari, Expedition Madagascar, Scott Aquarium renovation, the enormous 28-acre African Grasslands, the Alaskan Waterpark, the 5-acre Children's Adventure Trails, Asian Highlands, Glacier Bay Landing, Sea Lion Shores, and even updated their Gorilla, Orangutan and Simmons Aviary complexes. It's like an entirely new zoo!

San Diego Zoo has opened (again since 2008) Elephant Odyssey, Outback, Africa Rocks, the enormous Bashor Bridge walkway, Reptile Walk, Komodo Kingdom, Hummingbird Habitat and added 80 species to the zoo after the opening of Wildlife Explorers Basecamp.

For me, my personal opinion from visiting more than 600+ zoos in my lifetime is that San Diego and Omaha are clearly the top two zoos in North America with no one else challenging them. Bronx and Saint Louis would be my next two, still excellent facilities but not at the same level as San Diego or Omaha.

I had an amazing day at the Bronx Zoo, and for my money it is clearly the #3 or #4 best zoo on the continent, but there is definitely a sign of stagnation. Is that too strong a word? JungleWorld, the Mouse House, World of Reptiles, the Children's Zoo (even with the renovation from around a decade ago), several of the aviaries here and there, etc., all need a little more TLC than they've received in recent years. It's such a great zoo, but a little freshening up in places wouldn't go amiss and for me to have almost an identical experience 17 years later is just not how a major zoo should be. I fully realize that it all comes down to funding, as the Wildlife Conservation Society has its hands full with 5 facilities and its conservation projects, but the Bronx Zoo could definitely use a lick of paint in a few zones and why not reopen the Monkey House as some kind of new complex as the next big addition?

Thoughts on my review?
Queens Zoo review:

I visited this zoo on August 13th, and it was my first ever trip to the facility. What really surprised me was how small it was, easily seen in an hour although that includes just a few minutes in the farmyard zone. The amenities are bare bones, as there is a single set of restrooms about halfway through the zoo, along with a tiny cafe that serves pre-made sandwiches and a small gift shop. A food truck was the sole offering for lunch and drinks were in a cooler on the ground that a family would take to the beach. For an AZA-accredited, Wildlife Conservation Society establishment, I was a little taken aback.

The good news is that the zoo is of a high standard, with only around 15 exhibits but there is a clear theme of focusing on animals from North and South America. I liked how the outer walking loop was wide and paved, but the short pathways to each enclosure consisted of woodchip paths. My wife and I went in the ornate entrance gates and headed right, past Andean Bears, a delightful aviary for Thick-billed Parrots and Burrowing Owls, Chacoan Peccaries and Southern Pudu, before making it to the approximate halfway point where one can sip a soda and look out at American Bison and California Sea Lions.

Up next are exhibits for species such as Coyote, Elk, Great Horned Owl, Cougar, Canada Lynx, Bald Eagle and American Alligator, plus a waterfowl pond. That's the entire zoo, except for the impressive 1964 Aviary with a winding path that goes up and then down in a one-way fashion. I was happy to see the zoo full of visitors on a smoking hot afternoon, including a couple of summer camp groups, but it is very tiny indeed.

Afterwards, we walked through Queens Park and past the New York Hall of Science and we spent an hour inside Queens Museum, which has a lot of information about the 1964 World's Fair and an absolutely staggering achievement in the shape of a vast panorama model of New York City. It's a massive room and an incredible creation that's well worth seeing and it was built in the 1960s but updated with 60,000 additions to the year 1992. It must be one of the largest scale models on the planet. We then wandered over to the million-pound, gigantic steel 'Unisphere' sculpture and later on that night we went to our first ever Major League Baseball game (Mets vs Braves). From strolling through the neighborhood from the subway station to Queens Park, it's what I'd call a rough-looking area, but between the zoo, the hall of science, the museum and baseball stadium it's well worth visiting the borough of Queens. :)
Loved the reviews for both zoos, it's been awhile since I saw a very detailed full review on Bronx, so glad that you shared it!
 
Late to the party, but I enjoyed reading about your re-visit to the Bronx (and the other NYC reviews of course). It was a surprise to see some new photos uploaded and then boom - a new review posted. Also glad to hear that the new World of Darkness is a solid addition to the Zoo.

This brought back some memories of my one and only visit back in 2022, when it became the big #50 zoo I toured - can't wait to go back at some point!
 
Back
Top