And what's also crazy, is that 97 is still an outrageously low amount!! And now we think that's a big amount compared to today!97?! A population decline of nearly 90 animals in less than 7.5 years!![]()
And what's also crazy, is that 97 is still an outrageously low amount!! And now we think that's a big amount compared to today!97?! A population decline of nearly 90 animals in less than 7.5 years!![]()
It's a pity that the vaquita didn't get some of the support that conservationists give to better know animals
They probably could be if someone attempted to.I went to an exhibition at London's Natural History Museum today. It included film of vaquitas and the comment that they can't be kept in captivity.
Nobody did, though. It’s a bit too late for any kind of captive breeding program now, though how well that would have worked I don’t know. We need to learn a lesson from this that we as a species should have learned centuries ago, sadly (but unsurprisingly) we haven’t.They probably could be if someone attempted to.
Given that the US shares the Gulf with Mexico it should set up a concurrent vaquita conservation program. That might be contentious, but given the experience of Sea World and like cetacean organisations with captive husbandry relevance they need to be seen to intervene. To allow a species to go extinct is just taking it to extremes, nay nigh on unacceptable.‘Manotazo’ de EU a México por ‘descuido’ a vaquita marina: pide consulta bajo el T-MEC
And according to this news report the US government May consider trade sanctions against México if the vaquita goes extinct.
Given that the US shares the Gulf with Mexico it should set up a concurrent vaquita conservation program.
Mea maxima culpa, Ouch! In all the fervour surrounding the imminent demise of this iconic species, I mistakenly assumed. The historical distribution according to IUCN Red List: Always (??) restricted to the northern part of the (Baja) Gulf of California.It doesn't - the Gulf of California is entirely bordered by Mexico![]()
A non rhetoric question: How can we avoid the imminent extinction of the vaquita?
I do agree ... it is really kind of what I meant when posting. I find it ridiculously infuriating that a politically correct US administration continues to threaten their Mexican couxterparts with economic exclusion measures, but hopelessly fails and botched any credible attempt at saving the vaquite porpoise. Sea World's sites in southern US are certainly well equipped to deal with any cetecean mammal challenge and the 10% chance of success is infinitely higher and preferable over a dead stagemate leading to total extinction. It puts kind of a shame on humanity we again allowed this to happen.At this point, I truly think we cannot.
The only measure which would potentially save them, in my opinion, would be to take the entire population into captivity and attempt to breed them there, but there is zero chance anyone would take that chance for political reasons, ARA reasons, and the fear that something would go wrong and the attempt would kill the final individuals (as more or less happened with Toolache Wallaby).
The problem is that their doom is certain without it.... personally I'd take the 10% chance that taking them into captivity might save them over the 100% knowledge doing nothing would doom them.
That is a plain inaccuracy and fodder from the uninformed, there is almost wilful ignorance in that attitude! We may not have experience with vaquita in captivity, but we do with herbouw porpoise species similar in ecology.I went to an exhibition at London's Natural History Museum today. It included film of vaquitas and the comment that they can't be kept in captivity.