CGSwans flies north for the winter

I'm glad that you enjoyed Plzen as much as I did; I also had the pleasure of meeting Tomáš and viewing the breeding rooms, but in my case I visited on a particularly busy day and he was unable to spare much time to chat, instead leaving myself and Helly to our own devices. Fortunately, this was on our second day of visiting the collection, so we didn't have to worry about fitting in the rest of the zoo as you did and as such travelled from Prague on both days - we managed to reach the zoo at about 0815 and as such were able to spend over half an hour in the Africa At Night house before night fell.
 
But I think I've told a satisfying enough story as it is.

And how! I've tried many times, but I really couldn't word it better myself. I'm really glad to see you had a great time, as it is indeed a wonderful collection!

I've never had the pleasure of talking to Tomáš for more than 10 minutes, but I would agree with you in saying he's Hall of Fame-worthy. Besides bringing up the collection to what it is now, he's also one of the friendliest people I've met.

It is very unfortunate that you had to race through the rest of the park, and that you had so little time in the African house; the zoo is a wonderful one to casually stroll around in, but that can only really be achieved if you have more than one day...

Lovely review! ;)
 
Two great reviews of two great zoos.

There's nothing particularly wrong with it - it's just a standard, 1980s-ish tropical House, but it was underwhelming, and for a while I thought the orangutans only had an indoor exhibit, so I was unimpressed by that until I found out I was wrong. Also nearby, and also contributing to my sense of disappointment, was the small and badly antiquated polar bear exhibit.

I think the stump-tailed macacaques do only have an indoor enclosure, at least on show, and it isn't at all impressive. Apart from the uninspiring enclosures the tropical walkthough aspect is also poorly executed I think; not that many freeflying birds and no real places to stop and observe them. It's a disappointing house but I imagine it will be some time before it's replaced.

A series of stock-standard small yards for macropods and Australian ratites left me unmoved, understandably enough,

This area will hold the Giant Pandas and Golden Monkeys in the future. It's a pity that they couldn't work out a way to make a contiguous Chinese area with the salamanders and the excellent Sichuan Aviary, but I imagine the flood plain was a pretty decisive factor in that decision.

And the best of the best down here was the series of hoofstock (and Barbary macaque) clffside exhibits. These are as much a triumph of the strategy of using your environment to best advantage as Ljubljana's lynx exhibit from a few days earlier.

Yes, some of the best exhibits the zoo world has to offer.

I'd been planning to use Prague as a long-range base, but from hostel bed to zoo gate was going to take two and a half hours: there was no way I wanted to be leaving at 5:30, so I made a belated decision to decamp to Plzen the night before, and paid the equivalent of €28 for one of the worst hotels I've ever stayed in, all while I had a very comfortable hostel already paid for back in Prague. The wifi worked on a part-time basis, and the mattress was thinner than a supermodel with hyperthyroidism. Urgh.

Not a lot of use to you, but perhaps for future readers: there is a perfectly serviceable hostel in Plzen. It's cheap and comfortable and very near a supermarket which is good for the more budget-concious amongst us. There's a forty minute walk to the zoo across the rather charming town centre and you'd be hard pressed to arrive at the 'wrong' entrance as well.

Along the way we chatted about how it is that Plzen came to have a collection so unique in its breadth and depth. In my ignorance I had assumed it was a legacy, that Plzen had always had so many species. I may have also tacitly assumed that entropy will win out, and that the collection will gradually thin out.

Yes, when I visited Martin made a similar point. At the fall of the iron curtain, apparently, Plzen was a fairly unremarkable Eastern European zoo. Since then there has not only been a huge institutional drive to get it to where it is today, but also I believe substantial investment and support from local government and by extension the community. Something I think everyone could be rather proud of.
 
It's cheap and comfortable and very near a supermarket which is good for the more budget-concious amongst us. There's a forty minute walk to the zoo across the rather charming town centre and you'd be hard pressed to arrive at the 'wrong' entrance as well.

The walk from the train station to the zoo is even quicker - at about 25-30 minutes - and passes through some very pleasant fields where I saw and heard numerous grasshopper warbler, cuckoo and yellowhammers to name but a few species :)
 
The walk from the train station to the zoo is even quicker - at about 25-30 minutes - and passes through some very pleasant fields where I saw and heard numerous grasshopper warbler, cuckoo and yellowhammers to name but a few species :)

Do you mean the fields that would be rendered even more pleasant by, say, 4.7 Asian elephants? :p
 
Those same fields had great spotted woodpecker, middle spotted woodpecker, eurasian jay, nuthatch and sparrowhawk for me! It was about a 25 minute walk from my (very cheap, though that's probably because it was winter) hotel as well, which was coincidentally located 2 houses away from Plzen's AkvaTera. :p

I agree, elephants would make Plzen even better! Has to be said, however, that they're one of the very few large zoos without elephants that pull it off very well.
 
Last edited:
Do you mean the fields that would be rendered even more pleasant by, say, 4.7 Asian elephants?

I'm reasonably sure that the particular fields where I saw said bird species aren't owned by the zoo :p and truth be told I didn't find myself missing the presence of elephants at Plzen at all!
 
I'm reasonably sure that the particular fields where I saw said bird species aren't owned by the zoo :p and truth be told I didn't find myself missing the presence of elephants at Plzen at all!

They look like public land with perhaps a few privately owned gardens and houses scattered amongst them. So the zoo could potentially acquire them quite easily (citation needed). I'm sure many people on here would say that significant change at Plzen would be unwelcome, but if I was the local council I would be thinking: "We've got a truly beautiful town, we've got a world-famous brewery, a world-class zoo and we're one hour away from Prague" (presumably less on the train). I visited in September, which isn't exactly high-season, but Prague was still rammed with tourists and yet Plzen, the town, was very quiet.

I'm not saying that a big expansion featuring elephants, orangutans and Javan leopards (you know they would have them) would change this dramatically, but it wouldn't hurt either.
 
At the fall of the iron curtain, apparently, Plzen was a fairly unremarkable Eastern European zoo. Since then there has not only been a huge institutional drive to get it to where it is today, but also I believe substantial investment and support from local government and by extension the community. Something I think everyone could be rather proud of.

When I first undertook a zoo tour of the Czech Republic, in 1995, visiting seven or eight collections, Pilsen didn't feature on the itinerary: it was very much a minor, backwater zoo, made a bit of a joke at the time due to its having a guidebook which, essentially, lied about its collection (about 75% of the animals suggested weren't actually to be seen at the zoo). Roll forward a quarter of a century, and I really would place it as one of the best half-a-dozen zoos in Europe - and not only because of the nerd-satisfying collection.

Do you mean the fields that would be rendered even more pleasant by, say, 4.7 Asian elephants? :p

For a while, there has been inchoate talk of the zoo expanding into the fields across from (south of?) the main entrance. I would obviously be in favour of any zoo expanding, but in this case it would be especially welcome. I think the next decade will be really interesting for Pilsen. If it were to fade, a little, and slip away from being such a top zoo, then it wouldn't be the first zoo to, fairly quickly, race into an ascendant position and then slip back again. I very, very much hope that it will maintain and build on its position as a major zoo. The expansion would certainly see to that.
 
I think the stump-tailed macacaques do only have an indoor enclosure, at least on show, and it isn't at all impressive. Apart from the uninspiring enclosures the tropical walkthough aspect is also poorly executed I think; not that many freeflying birds and no real places to stop and observe them. It's a disappointing house but I imagine it will be some time before it's replaced.

Whilst I wouldn't argue that the Indonesian Pavilion is a great zoo house, I think its not quite as bad as all that. In some ways it reminds me of Chester's newish tropical house (Monsoon Forest?). I'd agree that the lack of an outdoor area for the macaques is a drawback; a bigger problem for the visitor (or this one, at least) was, as you suggest, the lack of opportunity to just sit and watch and soak up the atmosphere - something which is possible in all great tropical houses, from Chester's old one, to Arnhem, to Zurich, to (on a much smaller scale) Krefeld. Against this, though, it does have that nocturnal corridor, which whilst it has all the faults usually associated with such areas (rather small cages, the whole issue of permanently-indoor animal accommodation), has some very interesting species on show. I think the orang viewing is good. And the Komodo dragon exhibit at the entrance is pretty impressive.

It's a 7/10 house - which stands out because so much of the rest of the zoo is 9/10 (the same criticism might be levelled at the recent Hippo House, I think).
 
For a while, there has been inchoate talk of the zoo expanding into the fields across from (south of?) the main entrance.
I just learned a new word! I actually googled it to make sure it wasn't a typo. I'm not sure I'll really get to use it - at least not as often as I do gallimaufry (which I have used at least three times) - but nice to know it exists. Thanks.
 
I don't think so with the lories. You can see into the indoor sections, and I looked closely for indications there were other birds in each aviary, It seems quite a coincidence if one bird was visible and the other not in four consecutive aviaries.

There is however a part of the indoor enclosure that you cannot see and which the parrots have access to ;)

I am a bit surprised by how high many people here rate Plzen zoo, sure the collection is amazing and as a park it is nicely laid out, but there are so many awfully small or overstocked enclosures and aviaries for which the good things really do not compensate imo.
 
Enclosure-wise, Plzen is indeed far from the best. Certainly in the winter it was very clear that they're never really ready for the winter. A lot of animals were in places they weren't planned to be, just because their own enclosure's moat froze over or was in another way rendered unsuitable by the cold. On top of that, all of the small bird 'islands' are small, wooden shacks that function extremely well in the summer, but are badly insulated in the winter.

I think the main thing that draws me towards it over many other zoos (besides the magnificent collection) is the general feeling; staff are among the most friendly staff I've seen anywhere, the park is very pleasantly laid out, and there's just the right balance of indoor vs outdoor areas to make it enjoyable at any time of the year. It also has some very innovative enclosures (rhinos and pygmy hippos come to mind), while at the same time giving the wonderful feeling of being at a very small zoo - even though the opposite is very much the case.

In my opinion, the Indonesian house is also not as bad as everyone claims it to be. I'd go as far as to say all exhibits in the house are decent to quite good, and I quite like the way the house is laid out. The only major flaws, in my opinion, are that the paths are too narrow around the orangutan viewing area, and that there is indeed not really a place where you can see the whole pavilion and attempt to watch the free-roaming birds. A lookout point (with a few benches!) over the lower part of the pavilion, right after you come upstairs from the nocturnal house, would be a very welcome addition.
 
In some ways it reminds me of Chester's newish tropical house (Monsoon Forest?).
For birdwatching, which I regard as the true raison d'etre of the tropical house, I rather fear this is the case, although my only visit to Monsoon Forest was before the birds had been introduced. I'll return to the comparison later.

I'd agree that the lack of an outdoor area for the macaques is a drawback; a bigger problem for the visitor (or this one, at least) was, as you suggest, the lack of opportunity to just sit and watch and soak up the atmosphere - something which is possible in all great tropical houses, from Chester's old one, to Arnhem, to Zurich, to (on a much smaller scale) Krefeld.
Completely agree. A good bird tropical house (in a good zoo) should invite you to linger until you are forced to drag yourself away. Copenhagen's is the best I've seen, but I'm hopeful I'll find a better one this summer.

Against this, though, it does have that nocturnal corridor, which whilst it has all the faults usually associated with such areas (rather small cages, the whole issue of permanently-indoor animal accommodation), has some very interesting species on show.
Indeed, but I think it was a mistake to make it a key part of the route, even on a not-too-busy day it felt cramped and crowded in there. As an optional side-corridor it would be much more enjoyable for me, although I can appreciate that the zoo wants people to see their collection.

I think the orang viewing is good. And the Komodo dragon exhibit at the entrance is pretty impressive.
I've reviewed the gallery to check and it certainly looks fine, but I remember being so underwhelmed at the time. It's not bad at all, but it just left me indifferent. I think every zoo has a range in the quality of its exhibits, and for most species having some unremarkable, adequate enclosures is fine. But for the As (not even the Bs and Cs) I personally want to see outstanding exhibits, at least in major zoos. I'm thinking elephants, great apes, sea lions and bears primarily. It's completely subjective, obviously.

It's a 7/10 house - which stands out because so much of the rest of the zoo is 9/10 (the same criticism might be levelled at the recent Hippo House, I think).
I agree. I'm sure if it was located in a different zoo it would seem much better. The Hippo House I'm less convinced by.
 
Indeed, but I think it was a mistake to make it a key part of the route, even on a not-too-busy day it felt cramped and crowded in there. As an optional side-corridor it would be much more enjoyable for me, although I can appreciate that the zoo wants people to see their collection.

I quite liked the use of the nocturnal house as a mandatory route, because it makes the hall seem a lot bigger than it actually is. You enter another area, spend quite a few minutes there, exit... And you're still in a tropical rainforest. Not many zoos have that opportunity.

However, a big problem with making the nocturnal part an area that people have to go through is the free-flying bats. Bats, as innocent as they are, are still an animal that some people can easily be scared by. While I was looking for the Bornean earless monitors (what a wonderful addition!), I heard not two, not three, but six screams of people startled by a bat.
It'd be fine if people afraid of them could bypass the area in some way, but as it stands it is literally the only possible way to get to the orangutan, porcupine and tree shrew exhibits - as the house, of course, is one-way.

I agree. I'm sure if it was located in a different zoo it would seem much better. The Hippo House I'm less convinced by.

Agreed. If we were to find this exact house in, for example, Zoo Plzen (which is one of my favorite collections, but the exhibit standard for the pavilions is lower), I think it'd get a lot more praise!
 
However, a big problem with making the nocturnal part an area that people have to go through is the free-flying bats. Bats, as innocent as they are, are still an animal that some people can easily be scared by. While I was looking for the Bornean earless monitors (what a wonderful addition!), I heard not two, not three, but six screams of people startled by a bat.
It'd be fine if people afraid of them could bypass the area in some way, but as it stands it is literally the only possible way to get to the orangutan, porcupine and tree shrew exhibits - as the house, of course, is one-way.
that's a pretty big (basic) flaw! Walk-through enclosures should always be able to be by-passed by the visitors! Even for walk-through aviaries, there are people who have bird phobias who may be able to visit the zoo as a whole without problem but literally would be terrified to be forced to enter an actual aviary. And bats, obviously, are much more of a problem for general visitors.
 
I am a bit surprised by how high many people here rate Plzen zoo, sure the collection is amazing and as a park it is nicely laid out, but there are so many awfully small or overstocked enclosures and aviaries for which the good things really do not compensate imo.
I have wondered about this myself. I haven't been there of course, so have no real comparisons to make, but I often see references to the sort of cages the animals are held in off-show (in particular), and just recently there was a post about the echidnas being kept in plastic bins which just made me think "what?!"
 
Zoo #31: Wroclaw Zoo, 24/06/2017

I should probably apologise to FunkyGibbon, who asked via a private message a few days ago if I was off to Poland next. No, I answered truthfully but perhaps not quite honestly, I was not at that time on my way to Poland. I was already there.

This was an unnecessarily complicated and slightly conflicted visit. Outside the dozen or so recognised Category A zoos across Europe (of which I have so far visited five: Beauval, Basel, Zurich, Vienna and Prague), Wroclaw was my wildcard, with its big and varied collection and one of the biggest new developments in the world, let alone Europe, over the past decade. I wondered if it might actually rank ahead of some of those dozen or so, but be suffering from its (relative) isolation.

By the time I left the hostel a little later than hoped, I only had about 6 hours to play with, because I was in Wroclaw for one thing only and had a bus out of town late that afternoon. I discovered the unnecessary complication on my way to the zoo, when I reached into my bag for a blood testing strip (I have mentioned before that I have diabetes), only to find that I'd neglected to pack any for the day.

A pain in the backside (though not in the finger for once, I suppose), but I didn't double back. Not only would that have come at the cost of a rushed and probably unenjoyable day, but I can typically tell if my blood sugar is low, and I at least had some ketone strips with me. They are what you use when your blood sugar is really high, to tell you if it's something to worry about. So for a few hours I could dead reckon the lows, and I could test for ketones in the afternoon as a double check.

I finally found my way to the zoo - the Plzen blisters were not yet healed, and my hostel was 600m walk from *anything* useful, so it was another painful day - and found a map. They charge 3 zloty for it - about 75 euro cents - which was annoying enough, and they have them in vending machines, so I couldn't get a map until I found a souvenir shop attendant willing to change notes for me. Irritating. As an aside, the zoo also had ticket vending machines: they are further along than most in replacing their paid visitor services staff with unpaid robots. I wonder how long it will be until zoos start to use automatic feed and medicine dispensers and watering systems to reduce keeper numbers, too.

The Afrykarium is really what it's all about here. It's an enormous, modernist slab of a building plonked in the centre of the zoo, and it looks the most like a convention centre or art gallery of any zoo exhibit I've ever seen. In the right setting - a revitalised post-industrial district, perhaps - I think I'd love it, but at the zoo I feel it imposes on and diminishes its surroundings. I intended to go in first but instead diverted in search of a toilet, thanks to another hay fever-induced sneezing fit. It's late June, for goodness sake. I think I might just be allergic to Central Europe.

From the bathrooms it made more sense to knock off the small 'European' loop at the top of the zoo, which turns out to be one of the best parts of the entire park. It has a gorgeous bear exhibit - with Zurich, Vienna, Plzen and now Wroclaw, Central Europe must be the best part of the world to be a zoo bear - and it reminded me of a deciduous Jurassic Park T-rex enclosure. It has the same ugly wire fence at the front, but a huge, leafy expanse behind it. I didn't find the bear, but I didn't mind. I've seen plenty of brown bears and very few enclosures as good as that. The other exhibits around here - for ibex and Barbary macaque, and for lynx and wild cat - were also good. Lynx might just be the exception to the rule that all small cat species get ripped off in zoos.

I delayed my Afrykarium foray further by covering all the exhibits to that side of the zoo, including the lemurs, lions and a variety of hoofstock fields. The latter are pleasant, but don't offer anything that Prague and Plzen hadn't earlier in the week. I gave them all rather short thrift, though that was partly because of my xenophobic immune system too. Getting inside was going to be a blessed relief.

Afrykarium, then. When I've visited 'zoo' aquariums before I've caught myself wondering whether they could get by as standalone attractions. Sometimes the answer is a firm 'no' - I can't imagine anybody ever paying enough money to visit Antwerp's aquatic hall, for instance, to keep it afloat. Sometimes the answer is 'maybe': Zurich's Exotarium comes to mind, though the aquarium exhibits are still only part of the greater whole.

In Wroclaw the question isn't whether Afrykarium could stand on its own two feet. The question is where it would rank alongside Europe's other big aquaria. Clearly behind Valencia and Lisbon, I think, but whether it jumps ahead of Genoa is a matter of taste and species preferences. As an aquarium the Afrykarium is held back by its paucity of small species and habitat tanks, but if you throw in the small aquarium building elsewhere in the zoo, and the excellent Oder River exhibit then that base is covered. There are certainly enough big name drawcards - sharks, penguins, sea lions, manatees, crocs and hippos see to that. Throw in some nice-sized cichlids and Red Sea tanks, and the excellent rainforest aviary and you've got yourself a pretty great aquarium.

I didn't love the hippos - I'll say it again and again, they don't need much water area, what they need is grass - but the manatees, sea lions and especially penguins were all very good. The latter might - no, is - the best I've ever seen. A huge surface area without compromising on depth: it was great to watch the penguins really building up some speed through the water. As an aside, I learned at the Afrykarium that the Polish name for a penguin is a 'pingwin', and I shall probably be running with that from now on.

The rest of the zoo is patchy, to be truthful. As has become a habit, I largely breezed past the various big mammal, and some small mammal, exhibits. Unless a zoo is doing something particularly interesting with them, my attention span has dwindled to almost nothing. The bottom right quarter of the zoo (if looking at the map) is quite weak, with bear pits that aren't worthy of sharing the same zoo as the brown bear one mentioned earlier, an antiquated elephant yard and a few ho-hum other bits and pieces. The monkey house is also a bit humdrum - it's ok, but nothing special and the external cages are small.

There are some excellent Island exhibits for squirrel monkeys and gibbons, though, but here's the thing: yet again they were all in their night quarters. It's becoming my biggest take home message from this trip: given the choice between an expansive, naturalistic, open air environment and the concrete dorm room they sleep in, animals overwhelmingly want to be home-bodies. I can't quite decide whether that's a problem or not.

With Wroclaw's reputation for diversity in mind had wanted to make sure I gave plenty of time to the bird and reptile houses, but I needn't have worried about the bird house. The indoors space was closed - I'm not sure if this is normal or I was just unlucky - and I was underwhelmed by the aviaries that ringed it around, or the small parrot aviaries near the reptile house (the castle-style aviaries for owls were better).

After the disappointments with the bird house and that lower right portion of the zoo generally, I sat down to check my blood sugar using the very rough method I described earlier. I'd felt low about an hour earlier and had some soft drink and now the ketones reading was...

0.3.

A reading of 0.1 is essentially a 'nil' reading and 0.2 is a warning sign (for me, at least) that you might want to take extra insulin, and that now would be a damn good time to do it. My diabetes control, in spite of a slovenly lifestyle, is surprisingly good and I don't think I've ever been at 0.3 before. What blood hadn't been used for the test must have drained from my face. If that test was accurate, and *if* I couldn't bring things back under control quickly, my time in Poland had just become very, very stressful indeed. The sort of stress only an extended stay in hospital could induce.

What I should have done was abandon the zoo, hop on the first tram back and get a proper blood sugar reading so I could figure out what the damage was. But the zoo was no more than 2/3rds seen, and it's likely to be many years before I am back this way. I decided to have an each-way bet. I gave myself a middling-sized extra dose of insulin, to jolt the blood sugar into coming down without it being *too* quick (potentially just as dangerous). And to flush - yes, literally flush - the apparent ketones from my system I bought two litres of water and gulped as much as it down as I could, until my belly was sore.

Those steps taken, I began rushing about the rest of the zoo. I wanted to at least see it, to have a concept of it to take home with me, but to be honest my mind was churning so rapidly that I wasn't enjoying myself. I raced through the terrarium, taking just long enough to realise I could have spent two hours in there. The exhibit quality is so-so, but the collection is remarkable. And they specialise in lizards, the so often over-looked poor cousins of the reptile kingdom.

I dashed about, covering the remaining outdoor exhibits, and resisted testing my blood again, however stressful it was, for 45 minutes. There would be no point testing earlier, because my mitigation efforts wouldn't show up in the test, so I just dashed from exhibit to exhibit trying not to dwell too much on whether disaster may have struck. Finally enough time passed and I, somewhat shakily, performed another test.

0.1.

Deep breath. Lots of deep breaths. I was ok. I think the first one must have been a random error in the reading, as I don't think the ketones, if they were there, could have gone away *that* quickly. Either way, there was now no reason not to stay at the zoo for the hour I still had available. Indeed, there was a compelling reason to stay: if I may be indelicate, that almost two litres of water I'd drunk was still going to require flushing, ketones or not.

I gave the remaining time, then, to the terrarium, which was certainly the most deserving. I couldn't help myself and began counting the lizard species. 86 species. 86, in one building! This must be a world record. And the diversity is from across the entire spectrum of the sub-class, from Komodo dragons to day geckos and from beaded lizards to chameleons. Astonishing.

I'm left struggling to categorise Wroclaw. Its best is enormously ambitious and enormously successful, but then there's also highly antiquated exhibits, and quite a few of them. The collection is remarkable for reptiles but sub-par, comparatively, for birds. I think it's going to be closer than most to cracking into that too dozen or so... but I'll be surprised, and slightly disappointed, if it does.

Later that day I stood at the bus station, more or less at the eastern end of Europe's zoological core that stretches in a wide south-easterly arc from Chester down to Vienna, Prague and Wroclaw. I have not stepped foot in arguably the two most central of those core zoo countries, Germany and the Netherlands. But here's the trouble: Wroclaw was day 78 on my Schengen visa. With only 12 days to go, could I really do credit to those two countries' zoo cultures, let alone their broader cultures? No, and it would be unfair to try. So instead I headed further east.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top