I read on Google Maps a review about Tierpark Hagenbeck, that was 1 star, which said "The zoo is great, but there was a huge traffic jam on the way to the zoo."
Paignton Zoo:
"snake was not my 34 year olds sons favourite colour"
In all honesty I find number five to be valid. I have not been there myself, so I cannot say if they are overreacting, but I also find the majority of zoo exhibits to be too small.Found some from my local zoo, the Capron Park Zoo:
1. "zoos are horrible, this place is no exception. Euthanize bears much?"
2. "They don't have Alligators or Crocodiles."
3. "Boring"
4. "ATTENTION !!! YOU CAN'T GO IN AT AFTER 15:00 !!! Information only on their website !!!"
5. "The enclosures for the leopard, lion and tiger are so small! They have no room to run, they’re all depressed and stressed out pacing back and fourth! They don’t play and just constantly look sad. The poor Mikey doesn’t even have any real trees, leaves or vines to climb on! This zoo has all the room to expand and give these animals more! That’s the last the could do! Please please please do more for these animals. It’s bad enough they are held captive their whole lives in Tiny enclosures for people’s happiness! At least give them what they deserve!" [Note- the zoo does not have a tiger, and has not for at least seventeen years].
If they are concerned about expanding exhibit size, that is valid. However I find it ridiculous that it mentions a small Tiger exhibit when the zoo has not held tigers for at least seventeen years, likely a lot longer. There is also the misspelling of monkey as "mikey", which is something odd. There is also no room to expand without enfringing on highly-utilized sections of the public park, so I don't know where they got the notion that the zoo has "all the room to expand".In all honesty I find number five to be valid. I have not been there myself, so I cannot say if they are overreacting, but I also find the majority of zoo exhibits to be too small.
Ok fair enough. I thought Mikey was the name of one of the animals!If they are concerned about expanding exhibit size, that is valid. However I find it ridiculous that it mentions a small Tiger exhibit when the zoo has not held tigers for at least seventeen years, likely a lot longer. There is also the misspelling of monkey as "mikey", which is something odd. There is also no room to expand without enfringing on highly-utilized sections of the public park, so I don't know where they got the notion that the zoo has "all the room to expand".
Nope- no animal named Mikey. They might be talking about the zoo's lemurs, but it could also be the debrazza monkey(s), who live in this habitat-Ok fair enough. I thought Mikey was the name of one of the animals!
Wow, that bear must be so stressed without other bears to fight and with shelter protecting it from the sun!solitary polar bear (huddled in a cave)
That final line was not part of the review.So get me right, this person mainly hates conservation and science...![]()
Thank you for pointing that out. I've deleted the post as I've seen I read the whole thing incorrectly...That final line was not part of the review.
Even ignoring the fact that both are solitary species, Lincoln Park has two polar bears and three rhinos so thats a moot point.I found this review from the Lincoln Park Zoo:
"There seems to be a solitary polar bear (huddled in a cave) and rhino."
![]()
Taronga Western Plains Zoo 1 star reviews:
And who plans to take their dog to the zoo? “We didn't get to have an experience there, as we are travelling in a caravan with 2 small, vaccinated dogs. Got to the main gate to find we could not go past there with them.... WHY isn't that put in brochures.”
Quite a lot of Germans. And a few Austrians.And who plans to take their dog to the zoo?
Two things that come up regularly on Tripadvisor:
*’enclosures were too small. Animals didn’t have enough space’.
*’enclosures were too big. Couldn’t see the animals’.
![]()