The Scotsman really likes to put the boot in doesn't it?
"Edinburgh Zoo has seen its visitor numbers slump by more than 90,000, despite a bumper year for rival leading attractions"
That claim doesn't really fit with the numbers in the same article:
"TOP ATTRACTIONS
Paid-for attractions, 2010
Edinburgh Castle, 1,210,248 visitors, +1.2% on 2009
Edinburgh Zoo, 547,364, - 14.1 %
Edinburgh Bus Tours, -2.4%
Falkirk Wheel 439,072, - 7.9%
Stirling Castle, 377,204, - 1.6%
Robert Burns Birthplace Museum, 298,460, +5.6%
Our Dynamic Earth, 295,997 -0.8%
Urquhart Castle, 286,262 +1.4%"
Of these top eight attractions, four others (as well as the Zoo) have fallen and of the three that have increased two have done so less than 1.5%. Hardly a "bumper year for rival leading attractions".
"Edinburgh Zoo has seen its visitor numbers slump by more than 90,000, despite a bumper year for rival leading attractions"
That claim doesn't really fit with the numbers in the same article:
"TOP ATTRACTIONS
Paid-for attractions, 2010
Edinburgh Castle, 1,210,248 visitors, +1.2% on 2009
Edinburgh Zoo, 547,364, - 14.1 %
Edinburgh Bus Tours, -2.4%
Falkirk Wheel 439,072, - 7.9%
Stirling Castle, 377,204, - 1.6%
Robert Burns Birthplace Museum, 298,460, +5.6%
Our Dynamic Earth, 295,997 -0.8%
Urquhart Castle, 286,262 +1.4%"
Of these top eight attractions, four others (as well as the Zoo) have fallen and of the three that have increased two have done so less than 1.5%. Hardly a "bumper year for rival leading attractions".