I know this is probably bait, but seriously? Just because the captive orca industry has bred incestuous calves before doesn’t justify them doing it again. “As if it would be the first time” I’m pretty sure everyone here is well-versed enough about captive orcas to know that it wouldn’t be the first time captive orcas were conceived through incest without that big list. Since (presumably) nobody here works as a trainer, we don’t know if these incestuous orcas have suffered any negative health effects from being inbred because we don’t have access to their veterinary history, only to the info the parks release to the public. And the Southern Residents are inbred because their population is too small to maintain healthy genetic diversity, not because they just love to produce
incestuous offspring. Their high levels of inbreeding are actually contributing to their decline:
Inbreeding Contributes to Decline of Endangered Killer Whales
I know that most people here are pro-cap, and even though I am firmly anti-cap for orcas I’m usually able to respect our differences of opinions, because I know that people on this website are usually pretty thoughtful and I myself was pro-cap for a long time. However, defending a marine park allowing such closely related animals to breed just because you want to see more calves in captivity is not right. Yes, if they conceive naturally it will be “their choice”, but since they don’t know they’re related to each other and
haven’t been taught by their families to mate with orcas they aren’t related to because of the messed-up social structures seem in captivity, the mating can’t really be called their “choice” or their “love”. Plus, any facility that cares for animals, no matter the species, has a responsibility to prevent their animals from doing things like this for their own good. If the captive orca population in Japan cannot continue to reproduce without incest, then it shouldn’t reproduce at all.