ZooNews2024
Well-Known Member
I certainly would never have described Rode's lake as 'disgusting' either. During all my visits it never looked green or silted up at all. As for the 'shabby' description, the lawns were always mown, the gravel paths around the wooded area clean and tidy. I'll allow the aviaries were homemade and made of wood and netting- but how else do you make aviaries on an economic basis ? Everything was very clean and tidy from my memories and I'm one of those folk who immediately notice if they aren't- even as my younger self..
As you say, we will have to disagree. Maybe it turns on that word ‘shabby’, although I can’t agree with Rode’s lake being ‘disgusting’ either!
We both seem to have had high regard for most of the places mentioned.
I’m very fond of my local zoo (Axe Valley) which has fairly similar enclosures, with a wonderful collection, good husbandry and a ‘not too shabby’ breeding record.
Anyway, I’m sorry never to have visited Guilsborough Grange, bits of which I’m sure I wouldn’t have liked.
I did send them some Kalij once….
Yes, I remember the Rode site was pretty with mown lawns, daffodils in the spring, the inherited mature trees and a nice miniature (real-steam) railway.
There are a series of pictures on here showing this, but the one below by Parrotsandrew (taken in 2000 apparently), is how I remember it - with rusty wire, and collapsing fences and aviaries. That is what I meant by 'shabby', and it really did not begin to compare with B-o-W, Kelling, Birdworld, Weston Underwood etc.
This was possibly just before it closed?
Sorry for posting this in the Guilsborough thread, but I did want to explain what I meant & how I remember it.
Last edited: