But there was also the 3 foot (9.1 meter) tall Flores "hobbit" (Homo floresiensis)
I always thought floresciensis was an example of island dwarfism instead of gigantism.
But there was also the 3 foot (9.1 meter) tall Flores "hobbit" (Homo floresiensis)
Yeah as an American as well I wish there was more size comparisons using feet and pounds but I suppose that's what happens when your country says "screw you" to the rest of the world "we're using our own measurement system"I'm really enjoying your series, but as an American I must say
1.8 m humans weighing 83 kg barely compute. haha![]()
Clearly you've been misleadI always thought floresciensis was an example of island dwarfism instead of gigantism.![]()
Or so we think... Giant ichthyosaur one of largest animals ever | EarthSky.orgWhenever I look at animals like this I always think "why was everything so much bigger in prehistoric times?" but then I remember the Blue Whale exists and I have to shut up.
~Thylo
Haven''t blue whales been recorded up to 33 meters?
Yes but my point is for the longest time we thought that the blue whale was the largest living animal ever and nothing approached it in size. This find however shows that some prehistoric marine animals had the potential to equal or even surpass the modern blue behemoth in sizeHaven''t blue whales been recorded up to 33 meters?
It's unfortunate we only have two living representatives of Giraffidae as it was once a really diverse family
Whenever I look at animals like this I always think "why was everything so much bigger in prehistoric times?" but then I remember the Blue Whale exists and I have to shut up.
~Thylo