Andrew Swales
Well-Known Member
Research by whom - the aircraft or tourism industries..? The ventilation systems of modern aircraft can filter out much, but this requires fresh air which is very cold. Whilst theoretically possible, in practice cabin air is re-circulated to save energy and costs. How else can they offer a ticket to Europe for less than £20?Research I have seen seems to indicate the actual time in the air is reasonably safe. This appears to be because of the design of the ventilation systems of modern jet aircraft. Time in airports less so, but as has been said, probably safer than your average supermarket. I actually think an aircraft would be safer than a ferry.
I strongly disagree ref the aircraft/ferry comparison. An air-flight to Europe from the UK would involve a flight of around an hour of very close confinement with hundreds of strangers, but half a day queueing and jostling in crowded indoor departure/arrival buildings. The same journey by ferry and road would probably take longer, but most of it, including the departure/passport/ticket/queueing would be done in the privacy of your own car, and the crossing itself could be outdoors on the deck in the open. I cannot see how the latter is possibly less safe than the former.
Absolutely, and I think given the variation in Europe, the list would be longer than just Australia.The real question is whether your intended destination wants to let you in. You would have absolutely no chance of going to Australia, for instance. That will continue to be an issue until the effectiveness of vaccines is established and a vaccine passport implemented. Qantas plans to restart international flights in late October, which in my mind is a reasonable indicator.
European countries have been shown to be very quick to abandon the central principle of free movement of goods and people, and slap movement restrictions on their own borders.
Last edited: