hey guys. i think some of the points here are kind of irrelevant given the situation.
firstly, if either melbourne or perth loaned their bull to taronga - that would only levae them in the same predicament. mature females and no bull to breed them with. tarongas error in age selection (if you, like me you believe it to be a bit of a ****-up decision), is just that THEIR ERROR. why should melbourne or perth suddenly jeopardise their programs just for taronga?
secondly, on the topic of moving bulls,...... whilst i certainly wouldn't reccomend it now, long-term i think its a better solution than moving cows. is it really true its that much harder to move bulls than females? i dunno if i believe that to be true. heman (tarongas old bull) was moved all the way to dubbo by road without a hitch. likewise, bong su apparently ate food whilst he was crate moved from his old exhibit to the opposite side of the zoo when the new exhibit arrived. as i discussed with one of melbourne zoos keepers - long term the prospect of purchasing (maybe though sponsorship like lindsay fox has done in the past) and modifying a special elephant moving vehicle, is a very real one. it can be shared between the zoos and can be specially designed for the sole purpose of moving elephants of all sizes, including bulls. logic to me indicates its not a big a deal as it often made out and moving bulls rather than cows are a more sensible option for long term group stablity. anyway... like i said earlier, things are mighty flexible.
and lastly, so that leaves us with three options at taronga at present.
a) import another, older bull.
b) make use of AI using the existing immature bull.
c) temporarily laon the two older cows to either melbourne or perth.
now i think taronga made two mistakes regarding bulls (1 moving heman, 2 gungs age) but since whats done is done lets talk about whats easiest and most realistic now...
to me option a) is a bit much. as if they would bring in another bull. forget it. you guys know the costs, housing issues etc that will arise from that. they only need the two oldest cows to fall pregnant once and then by the tme they are dur for their second calf gung might very well be up to the job himself.
so maybe option c) - loaning the females to another zoo. again, thats difficult. perth proably has the more space and that means putting them on a flight etc.. costly exercise, that really just opens them up once again for a bit of criticism and exposes their error. and all that is even if another zoo would agree to do so. besides, like zoopro said, its probably going to be easier at this stage if all first gen offspring are kept un mixed within their respective zoos.
now i'm not a big fan of AI, and i believe it to be expensive but really, like i said, option b) is potentially a one off and is probably cheaper and less of a headche all round than moving elephants or importing more.
thats whats going to happen, and whilst its was a stupid decision, there isn't really "a problem" with the taronga elephants as such.
they just best get a bloody move on.
firstly, if either melbourne or perth loaned their bull to taronga - that would only levae them in the same predicament. mature females and no bull to breed them with. tarongas error in age selection (if you, like me you believe it to be a bit of a ****-up decision), is just that THEIR ERROR. why should melbourne or perth suddenly jeopardise their programs just for taronga?
secondly, on the topic of moving bulls,...... whilst i certainly wouldn't reccomend it now, long-term i think its a better solution than moving cows. is it really true its that much harder to move bulls than females? i dunno if i believe that to be true. heman (tarongas old bull) was moved all the way to dubbo by road without a hitch. likewise, bong su apparently ate food whilst he was crate moved from his old exhibit to the opposite side of the zoo when the new exhibit arrived. as i discussed with one of melbourne zoos keepers - long term the prospect of purchasing (maybe though sponsorship like lindsay fox has done in the past) and modifying a special elephant moving vehicle, is a very real one. it can be shared between the zoos and can be specially designed for the sole purpose of moving elephants of all sizes, including bulls. logic to me indicates its not a big a deal as it often made out and moving bulls rather than cows are a more sensible option for long term group stablity. anyway... like i said earlier, things are mighty flexible.
and lastly, so that leaves us with three options at taronga at present.
a) import another, older bull.
b) make use of AI using the existing immature bull.
c) temporarily laon the two older cows to either melbourne or perth.
now i think taronga made two mistakes regarding bulls (1 moving heman, 2 gungs age) but since whats done is done lets talk about whats easiest and most realistic now...
to me option a) is a bit much. as if they would bring in another bull. forget it. you guys know the costs, housing issues etc that will arise from that. they only need the two oldest cows to fall pregnant once and then by the tme they are dur for their second calf gung might very well be up to the job himself.
so maybe option c) - loaning the females to another zoo. again, thats difficult. perth proably has the more space and that means putting them on a flight etc.. costly exercise, that really just opens them up once again for a bit of criticism and exposes their error. and all that is even if another zoo would agree to do so. besides, like zoopro said, its probably going to be easier at this stage if all first gen offspring are kept un mixed within their respective zoos.
now i'm not a big fan of AI, and i believe it to be expensive but really, like i said, option b) is potentially a one off and is probably cheaper and less of a headche all round than moving elephants or importing more.
thats whats going to happen, and whilst its was a stupid decision, there isn't really "a problem" with the taronga elephants as such.
they just best get a bloody move on.