There is something not right here, years ago many zoos emerged in the U.K. with main purpose of making money for their owners, there was no suggestion at all of any conservation efforts, if the animal died, simple, get onto the dealer and get a replacement, there was hardly any mention of education apart from sticking up some label outside the animal's cage telling you its scientific name and its country of origin, if you were lucky, these poky little places have now all gone fortunately. Quite a few zoos in the U.K. have closed in recent years, few, although not all will not be missed. What have they been replaced with?. Monkey World in Dorset, although officially not classed as a zoo but a rescue centre for primates, I don't think there is anybody who can question the good work that has been, and continues to be done at this place. South Lakes Wild Animal Park, they have limited space, although I understand this is soon to be enlarged, all housing is of a home made style, with too many animals living in this limited space, including mixed exhibits of animals which are considered by many unsuitable to be sharing mutual accommodation. Noah's Ark. kicked out of B.I.A.Z.A. for obtaining tigers from a circus and not exactly telling the truth about their place of origin. I have not visited this place, all I know of it is from what I have read and seen on here, it does not make attractive reading, particularly from posters who I think always know what they are talking about,not bothered about breeding pure bred animals, a giraffe is a giraffe, a zebra is a zebra as far as the people with their admission money in the hands are concerned, this is progress?, my opinion is these two establishments are no better than the seaside zoological attractions of yesteryear in a very twenty first century way of course!