Still baffled as to why Cincinnati took the option of shipping the three post-reproductive cows out to The Elephant Sanctuary off of the table.
TES is AZA accredited, over 3,000 acres in size, securely fenced, has multiple roomy barns, the resident elephants are cared for by experienced staff and social opportunities are present for virtually any elephant's needs. (Cow, Bull, African, Asian, Exposed to TB, etc and so forth.)
I know it used to have a staunchly anti-elephants-in-zoos stance, but that's died down significantly since it received AZA accreditation.
I know that there's disease concerns, but the elephants who are confirmed carriers of TB (Along with those with a history of TB exposure), are housed separately from the rest of the herd. Those elephants have their own barn, habitat and dedicated care staff. There's no crossover between the two herds as far as I'm aware.
I know that Carol Buckley is a controversial figure within the elephant caretaker community to say the least, but she hasn't been involved with TES for at least a decade now.
I know that there's recently been some deaths of elephants who were (relatively) recently moved to TES from their longtime zoos, but all of those animals were either geriatric or had known chronic health problems. (And more often than not, both!) Other elephants who have been moved to TES within the same span of time have remained healthy.
So... What gives? None of the possible known concerns are insurmountable.
Cincinnati's three post-reproductive cows all appear to be in decent health and while one could certainly characterize them all as seniors, none are exactly geriatric. All of them could live for another decade, easy. Some even longer that that!
It's not like TES and Cincinnati are clear across the country from one another either, you could knock out a transfer within a single day and that would be taking it slow.