And the Ethiopian wolf or Simien jackal that isn't a jackal or wolf
But the name "fox" is just a common name for most small canids, it isn't specific to members of the genus Vulpes.The Grey Fox is not actually a fox but in a genus of it's own (along with the Island "Fox")
Many of the South American "Foxes" aren't actually foxes either.
I think they're attributing the label of fox to the orange part of the tree so bat eared, raccoon dog, etc. But then you could say foxes is not a taxonomic grouping at all, and it's a term like fish which is polypheletic, yet still used.But the name "fox" is just a common name for most small canids, it isn't specific to members of the genus Vulpes.
Do you maintain a position that only birds of the genus Anas are ducks, and all the other so-called ducks are "not actually" ducks? And what about all the pheasants which aren't in the genus Phasianus? There are well over 4000 species of anurans which aren't in the genera Rana or Bufo, so what are they if they aren't frogs or toads?
Yes, but he specifically said Grey and Island Foxes "aren't actually foxes" because they are in a different genus. Common names of canids are mostly related to size (fox versus wolf or dog), not to genera - same as (for example) "duck" and "goose" in waterfowl.I think they're attributing the label of fox to the orange part of the tree so bat eared, raccoon dog, etc. But then you could say foxes is not a taxonomic grouping at all, and it's a term like fish which is polypheletic, yet still used.
Although isn't canid taxonomy like extremally volatile? Like I tried o find as up to date as I could OneZoom had really weird ones and I think the most recent one I could find had foxes mixed with canids? Although I assume some version of the above tree is correct.
With canids I'd suggest it's big = wolf, small = fox with a couple of dogs dropped in there for good measure.
Probably not, and definitely not the “Brazilian” part of the name. I’m sure, however, that plenty of people (including, of course, the known originator of the name on Wikipedia) unfamiliar with coatis would confuse them with anteaters or aardvarks.“Brazilian Aardvark” for the Coati. That was a thing that happened, wasn’t it? But I think it goes further back than the Wikipedia stuff. There’s this super obscure cartoon called “Spirello” that was basically about animals in the jungle with spiral legs (it wasn’t a very good show…), and there was an “aardvark” who is very clearly a coati. That show came out in 2003, so maybe it’s responsible for the “Brazilian Aardvark” monicker for the coati?
Rather off topic, but that's a really nice cladogram. I like it.The Grey Fox is not actually a fox but in a genus of it's own (along with the Island "Fox")
Many of the South American "Foxes" aren't actually foxes either.
![]()