Baboon Rock needs knocking down. Massive safety hazard and isn’t adequate for the animals living there.Good news imho about the baboons. I really like Baboon Rock.
Baboon Rock needs knocking down. Massive safety hazard and isn’t adequate for the animals living there.Good news imho about the baboons. I really like Baboon Rock.
Safety hazard in what way? Imho they could add a flat foraging area and extend the offshow areas at the back. It’s still a very attractive exhibitBaboon Rock needs knocking down. Massive safety hazard and isn’t adequate for the animals living 0 there.
Staff can’t work in the enclosure to clean it without extensive safety gear (ropes/harnesses etc) and the concrete isn’t stable.Safety hazard in what way? Imho they could add a flat foraging area and extend the offshow areas at the back. It’s still a very attractive exhibit
Mappin Terraces all over again then. It’s still imho a very attractive exhibitStaff can’t work in the enclosure to clean it without extensive safety gear (ropes/harnesses etc) and the concrete isn’t stable.
The offshow is decades out of date.
A number of years ago, I suggested building an overhead tunnel to link the grass paddock behind the restaurant, and use the existing footprint of the current spider monkey house (originally built for Celebes Macaque) with an extension to house the Baboon group. The paddock could be hot wired, in the same way the proposed zebra hillside paddock would have been. Baboon rock, could be worked on in stages and eventually phased out or added as part of a larger enclosure.Safety hazard in what way? Imho they could add a flat foraging area and extend the offshow areas at the back. It’s still a very attractive exhibit
I agree re. Markhor.Markhor sounds a great addition, at least as good as Takin, if not better.
So where does the cancellation of the new baboon area leave things? i.e. 1. will the baboons just stay on their rock indefinately, or does its poor state mean they will have to leave the zoo at some stage? 2. What will happen to the partially developed paddock and new building?
As I stated before, I just feel they need to do ‘something’ short term as it’s a HUGE area (combined with the adjacent ex Lechwe and now vacant zebra and camel areas) to leave empty.
The maintenance and primate teams have made some improvements to the rock exhibit including new separation cages off-show, partly to meet zoo license regs, but also when they started to train the troop in readiness for their now cancelled move.
The giraffe herd is very edgy and hates change. They’re only using the elephant paddock infrequently and perhaps the keeper team are waiting until the old elephant barn is fully converted for the giraffe to move in to before adding more zebra/antelope? A confident bull may help?Its a difficult conundrum for them to sort out. Like ffbird, I hope the baboons stay where they are anyway, as I think it is a better and more natural exhibit for them than a field without the 'rocky' topography. But I also know the rock is structurally compromised and perhaps already past its useful life, but hope perhaps they can resurrect it somehow but that's more money needed from somewhere.
Regarding the hillside field and the rest, maybe the paddock and new housing could now be re-adapted for a new ungulate species without too much additional cost?
I think that the entrance doors have to be altered, height wise (?), but also the feeding and husbandry furniture, including the veterinary crush pens, have to be moved/added. Also, to avoid undue stress on the giraffe herd, they didn’t want to physically force the giraffe into the elephant paddock, or knock them out to do so. They’ve had years to pass the threshold between the paddocks and it’s been a very slow process.Is there any reason why they had to move the Giraffes to the elephant side? Could they not have just put the zebras in there in the first place, and avoid this problem?
I think that the entrance doors have to be altered, height wise (?), but also the feeding and husbandry furniture, including the veterinary crush pens, have to be moved/added. Also, to avoid undue stress on the giraffe herd, they didn’t want to physically force the giraffe into the elephant paddock, or knock them out to do so. They’ve had years to pass the threshold between the paddocks and it’s been a very slow process.
Thanks for your response. I think there has been a miscommunication here, for clarity, I meant was there not a reason that the giraffes could stay on there side, and the zebras placed in the old elephant side. Though your answer is illuminating regarding the changes they would have to make to the housing.
Now that would be the dream!Considering it housed elephants I'm persuming it's bigger.
I had hoped that once all renovated they could have converted the old giraffe enclosure to house another large animal(Okapi possibly?)
Now that would be the dream!
I've said this a few times but unfortunately come to the same conclusion as you. If only!Personally I would live to see them house common hippo but that would require so much work and funds which are just sadly never going to materialise
Thanks for your response. I think there has been a miscommunication here, for clarity, I meant was there not a reason that the giraffes could stay on there side, and the zebras placed in the old elephant side. Though your answer is illuminating regarding the changes they would have to make to the housing.
Very sad! Thoughts with all the staff