my post about no zoos having the frogs was from February, so it wasn't long before it was made incorrect! I can think of some reasons the zoos in question may not want to shout about receiving endangered species from a shady animal dealer...Since April 2016, one very well-known USA zoo has maintained Togo Slippery Frogs.
At least 2 well-known USA zoos (other than San Diego) are currently keeping Tree Pangolins, and there have been births to females which were pregnant when imported.
However, it seems clear that these zoos - at least for now - don't wish to shout this information from the rooftops. I don't like the amount of secrecy that seems to pervade parts of the zoo world, but perhaps they have their reasons.
I would assume this may not have been the only breeding at the center ..!???From a recent Facebook post, a male pangolin was born in August last year. Through their media, I've been able to tell that the center should have at least 3.3 now, though of course it's likely a much higher number.
I assume you are correct, but this is the only one that they have announced since the birth that this thread started with.I would assume this may not have been the only breeding at the center ..!???
It's not that the place has only 3.3, it's just that it has at least 3.3. As I posted above, the number is probably much higher, but from various press releases and social media postings that's how many that I can confirm.so what happend to all the other pangolins, if only 3.3 left at this facility ?
Would you mind a explanation Thylo? The Brookfield zoo (Who got their pangolins from this place) has already bred 5 pangolins in a year! Not to mention, they will be going on display in a few months. Thanks to this charity base, the public will soon be educated about the plight the scaly mammal is facing, and it's thanks to this place.I wish this site wouldn't keep promoting this place...
~Thylo
Would you mind a explanation Thylo? The Brookfield zoo (Who got their pangolins from this place) has already bred 5 pangolins in a year! Not to mention, they will be going on display in a few months. Thanks to this charity base, the public will soon be educated about the plight the scaly mammal is facing, and it's thanks to this place.
Fair enough, I was just curious. My point is that they have bred a steady amount of pangolins and that they are doing good work, even though how they got their hands on them was a controversial method.Just because Brookfield got pangolins does not necessarily mean they came from this place. The import of the pangolins to this center and the import of pangolins to the US zoos were two different imports that took place at different times. Yes this center imported pangolins for US zoos in the past but none of those survived. And do not mistake already pregnant wild-caught females giving birth at a zoo as the same thing as breeding the species.
I agree that the plight of this species and its entire family needs to be brought to the public eye and that captive breeding programs are necessary, but I do not wish to support any center that receive their animals through the same means as the ones pushing them towards extinction. There's a body count leading up to the 4.3+ animals at this facility and the means of acquiring these animals and working out their husbandry is far from kosher.
~Thylo
Fair enough, I was just curious. My point is that they have bred a steady amount of pangolins and that they are doing good work, even though how they got their hands on them was a controversial method.
You make a good point, but with only 4.3 known, it's hard to know how many have died and how many have given birth.Are they doing good work if the methods by which they do it is controversial? The word "counterintuitive" comes to mind here; how many pangolins does this guy breed compared to how many die at his hands? I'm not trying to take a stance here, by the way; one could also argue that the husbandry research developed will be worth it in the long run, or that those individuals might not have been better off in their native habitat anyway. Just food for thought.
nobody knows, any more than anybody knows how many Miller has imported and how many have died in his hands. He really doesn't help his "cause" by being so secretive.In the past on this thread it's been implied that births at this facility are just 'imported pregnancies' rather than actual breeding successes. Has this been proved or refuted? That would be useful to know.
I would be interested in a more official confirmation of many pangolins arriving behind the scenes in major zoos.
And please remember, that big factor in keeping pangolins is that in Africa they are commonly captured alive by hunters, bound, and long displayed for sale on local markets as living ladders. Most individuals probably arrive in zoos from that source - so they are very sick and emaciated to begin with. Big mortality is not a surprise then.
There is no proof the animals were taken from a soon-to-be-extinct population and I would highly doubt that they invested sufficient research into population research to see what the impact is of them taking these animals from the wild into captivity. Also I would highly doubt that he set up protocols on how to manage this population in such a way that it is helpful for conservation.
And selling animals to private owners without a studbook or agreement on how to manage them as a single population is trade not conservation. Let's not get fooled by the nice words.
Most, if not all, came through him and were sold to zoos.But did these animals come from this guy? I didn't know about the frogs but I was under the impression that the pangolins were imported separate from him.
~Thylo![]()
It is interesting that one of the zoos that acquired pangolins from him also received 0.0.13 frogs imported from Togo. Hmmmm....Well, the 'Pangolin Conservation' website says "We've already carried out and are stepping up an ex-situ program to secure this species [Togo Slippery Frog] in zoological facilities across the USA, as a 'backup' in case our other efforts fail."
And at the same time, 1 USA zoo is confirmed as recently having acquired the species.
Could be coincidence...but my instinct says probably not.