Snowleopard's 2010 Road Trip

Must have been writing my ealier comment while you were writing that review earlier lol lol :P

Sedgwick sounds very good, would love to visit there some day

BTW, before the amur leopards were in that enclosure, it housed Amur tigers until the 90's :S

The hamadryas baboon enclosure was also the old lion exhibit before "Pride of the Plains" opened in 2000
 
Good to hear all is okay Snowleopard,

Have been a little obsessively checking for your latest review... and was wondering what had happened.

Great to read your review's. I will also now have to visit Sedgwick County Zoo.

I hope these zoo's are looking after you and your family. This kind of viral marketing is priceless.

Tell me Cheyenne Mountain Zoo and the budgie building. The bird shown on the CMZ web site is what l would call a parakeet not a budgie at all. Is it an Australian thing? I am aware budgies are parakeet's. I just think that budgies are significantly more diverse in colour and more attractive.

Safe travels
 
Thank you Snowleopard for writing yet another great review, the Sedgewick County Zoo seems like a very interesting zoo that I need to visit. Sorry to hear about your memory card at the CMZ
 
DAY 6: Saturday, July 17th

Zoo/Aquarium Review #4: Tulsa Zoo & Living Museum

Tulsa Zoo’s website:

Tulsa Zoo & Living Museum :: The Tulsa Zoo & Living Museum

Zoo Map:

http://www.tulsazoo.org/userImages/files/zoomap09_1outlined.pdf

Tulsa Zoo & Living Museum was a disappointment for me, as there was not one single fantastic exhibit and I expected much more out of this Oklahoma zoo. Having seen the brilliant Sedgwick County Zoo the day before, I was doubly dismayed to gaze upon the many outdated enclosures that are randomly scattered on the grounds of the Tulsa establishment. For example, Sedgwick County had amazing lion and tiger exhibits, amongst the best of their kind in any North American zoo, while Tulsa had puny grottoes for those big cats that were an embarrassment to behold. For some folks Tulsa might be a worthwhile zoo, but I’ve been to enough in my life to claim that everything constructed at the Tulsa Zoo has been done much better elsewhere. I’m coming across quite harshly in my opening paragraph, and I should stress that Tulsa Zoo & Living Museum is a thousand times better than many atrocious roadside menageries, but I’d definitely rank it between #50-60 of the 60 best zoos in “America’s Best Zoos”.

THE BEST:

Tropical American Rainforest – This building is what I consider to be Tulsa’s premier exhibit, and I have affection for the gargantuan indoor jungles that are found in a number of American zoos. It does not compare to similar rainforest buildings at Omaha, Bronx or Sedgwick County, but it is somewhere in the next handful of top-class jungles. The paved walkways are easier to push a stroller on, but I prefer the thick mulch and dirt found in Omaha and Sedgwick County. The ruined temple theme is hit-and-miss, but the impressive number of South American animals is great to see. There are species such as: sloth, howler monkey, golden-headed lion tamarin, anaconda, poison dart frog, jaguar, spectacled owl, and a wide variety of other reptiles, amphibians and fish. The jaguar enclosure is disappointing and the lack of signage in many areas is rather alarming, but overall an enjoyable and atmospheric jungle experience.

Chimpanzee Connection – A large, incredibly lush island makes for an amazing enclosure for the chimps but not always popular with humans. There were complaints that the apes were impossible to locate, and of the large troop I saw only the single youngster through the thick undergrowth. It is still great to see such a densely planted exhibit for our nearest relatives.

Siamang/Spectacled langur island – Similar to the chimp island except this one is absolutely enormous and the equivalent of an equatorial rainforest. The sheer volume of foliage made it next to impossible to spot an ape or monkey unless it was moving rapidly along the edge of the enclosure, but it was a joy to attempt to see the occasional animal as it peered out from its island home.

THE AVERAGE:

East African Savanna – A fairly average set of paddocks with many shady spots for the animals, which was essential as it was over 100 degrees Fahrenheit on the day of my visit. Zebras, Grant’s gazelles, marabou storks and African crowned cranes were in a large yard, and there were greater kudu and Cape buffalo in adjacent paddocks that were nice but nothing above what is average in major zoos. Somewhat surprising there was only the single male giraffe in a large yard, as most zoos have at least a handful of that tall species of mammal. Cheetahs have a gorgeously planted yard that is very impressive, while meerkats, ostriches and aldabra tortoises are all found nearby.

Elephant Encounter – An elephant museum found here is rather interesting, but it has terrible indoor viewing with scratched windows and it is not as large as a similar one found at the Oregon Zoo. The bull paddock is tiny and barren, and it comes with terrible viewing opportunities as there is actually wire across the cut-out panels in the small shelter. The female enclosure is actually rather small in comparison to the multi-acre paddocks that are the norm in American zoos these days, although it was a treat to see 4 female elephants all crowding into their pool.

LaFortune North American Living Museum – This aging relic needs to be updated, as while the graphics and educational opportunities are there some of the information is antiquated, many of the exhibits are subpar, and there is an overwhelming sense of age and dust about the place. Peering closely there are many signs of peeling paint, scratched windows, chipped tiles and empty exhibits. The first building of the 4 building complex is the ARCTIC/TUNDRA, and the empty polar bear exhibit might be the smallest of its kind in North America. Thank goodness the bear died so that it doesn’t have to live for another few years in such a tiny, sterile, 1970’s pit. Unfortunately the zoo plans to add grizzlies or Kodiaks to the enclosure, so hopefully there are significant upgrades to the “cement paradise”. A small arctic fox exhibit is indoors, and a tiny, barren snowy owl enclosure as well. There is an empty paddock outdoors, so for the entire building there are 2 owls and a fox. Not exactly brimming with animals! To make matters worse the museum section is outdated, with the word “Eskimo” on all of the placards and signage. I’m a high school teacher, and here in Canada the word “Eskimo” is a racist term that has been changed to “Inuit” probably 20 years ago, and there was a story in the news a few years back of a teacher being suspended for continually using the old terminology.

The second building is the best, SOUTHWEST DESERT, with a walk-through desert environment and a set of terrariums set against the wall. The nocturnal section is nice, but I’ve seen loads of much better desert exhibits in other zoos and the outdoor peccary enclosure is by far the smallest I’ve ever seen for that species.

The EASTERN FOREST building has a pretty white-tailed deer/wild turkey outdoor exhibit, a cool bald eagle aviary, an average black bear enclosure, a skunk/raccoon area, a ridiculously small indoor black crow exhibit (when there are thousands of crows everywhere outdoors) and a decent but small cave section with lots of little tanks and terrariums.

SOUTHERN LOWLANDS has a cool “Bioluminescence” room, an adequate alligator swamp outdoors, and a downright awful interior. A pair of brown penguins is in an algae-covered enclosure, spoonbills and herons are in an unattractive but vertically decent enclosure, and another gator pool is poor at best. A coral reef aquarium is nice but unspectacular.

Helmerich Discovery Center – The typical educational building found at almost every major zoo, complete with terrariums and children’s activities.

African Black-footed Penguins – A scenic enclosure featuring stinky penguins that is nice but nothing too noteworthy.

THE WORST:

Andean Bear Grottoes – Awful in every sense of the word, as there are two cement enclosures with very little natural substrate for at least 3 spectacled bears. I’ve seen so many fantastic, world-class bear exhibits that to see such cement atrocities creates nothing but sadness to the human visitors.

Seal Lion Pool – An unfinished exhibit that was supposed to open in 2009 but is now set for spring of 2011. The pool appears to be mainly complete, and I hope that there will be some natural rockwork added to what is so far a sterile environment. This could be a much exhibit than what it appears to be, but I don’t have high hopes for this zoo to be able to pull off a masterpiece.

Children’s Zoo – The usual red barn and domestic animals, but this farmyard area lacked decent signage and seemed outdated and fairly barren for both visitors and animals. Yet another disappointment.

Big Cats – Lion and tiger grottoes that are totally cramped for the occupants and a disgrace to the zoo. There are at least 20 absolutely fantastic lion exhibits in North America, many that are all grass and at least half an acre in size…and yet Tulsa had two sitting on a stretch of land that they could cross in less than 10 seconds. The Malayan tigers had an equally nasty, horrible little grotto. The snow leopard cage down the walkway was far too small and barren for such wonderful creatures.

Conservation Center – What exactly is being conserved in this antiquated, smelly old building? A total mish-mash of fish, reptiles, amphibians, monkeys and birds with no links between any of the species and a total disregard for quality exhibitry for the primates. The fish tanks are adequate, the reptile/amphibian terrariums are actually rather large and impressive (including a massive blue iguana), the reptile nursery was interesting, but the bird cages are small and outdated and the monkey cells are straight out of Alcatraz prison. Sterile, tiny, filthy indoor areas that are incredibly small and lacking in natural substrate while the outdoor yards are much better but still way too tiny. It seems as if this building is just an area for a hodge-podge of whatever the zoo feels deserves a horrible fate of death of boredom! A row of outdoor aviaries featured numerous macaws that were probably begging to be put out of their misery, but it was a tough call between them and the monkeys (such as Diana guenons, saki monkeys, golden-headed lion tamarins, etc) as to who had the worst enclosures. I vote for the monkeys.

OVERALL:

Tulsa Zoo & Living Museum has a very good tropical rainforest building and a pair of excellent primate islands that are lushly planted. After that the zoo ranges from average to atrocious, and there needs to be a significant amount of upgrading to be done before it can be truly recognized as a decent zoo. Even exhibits that might be considered excellent by some visitors, such as Elephant Encounter, are weak in my mind. With something like 20 or more elephant enclosures in American zoos now packed with walking trails, multiple pools and being 2 acres or greater in size the Tulsa exhibit comes across as a little past its due date. The massive, 4-building complex that is the LaFortune North American Living Museum is badly in need of a paint job, new signage and an upgrade of at least half of its exhibits. With only a new sea lion pool on the horizon I fear for the future of this zoo, as the outdated enclosures will continue to sit and gather dust until funding is provided for better exhibitry.

My wife and I chatted for at least 15 minutes with an elderly docent, and he told us that the zoo has been plagued with financial problems for decades. According to him the slowly aging LaFortune North American Living Museum complex was originally supposed to be a staggering 9 buildings (he even quickly rattled off the names of the other sections), but a lack of funds cut that plan by more than half in the 1970’s. There are zoo council meetings where he claims there are staff divided on whether or not to pursue funding to add additional buildings and update the current ones, as well as staff members who feel that the entire complex is expensive to upkeep and should be demolished due to its deterioration. He said that whenever he goes on vacation with his wife they plan their trip around zoos (sounds familiar!) and that he used to rate his local zoo quite highly until he saw 20,30 or 50 others. The more zoos he saw the more he realized how outdated Tulsa was, and that sums up my thoughts completely.
 
Being one of the only other people who has visited the Tulsa Zoo, I think I agree with you on most of your review. However, I found the North American Living Museum far more enjoyable than you did. I'm glad to see that the Southern Lowlands was open as it was closed during my visit last month. Here's what I do know about Tulsa. In just a few days they will be privatized just like Dallas was last year. The Zoo readily admits to its crumbling facade which is one reason for the privatization. I think that the NALM will be getting a makeover and I know that the grottos are a huge priority for renovation/demolition. The Sea Lion pool you saw is the old one, as far as I know, now new construction has begun on it. Time will tell on Tulsa, but judging on the effect I've seen of privatization it will be a very good thing for the zoo.
 
Snowleopard,

Something I wanted to mention to you reading your past couple reviews. The Buffalo Zoo's rainforest has a sign that request parents to leave their strollers in the lobby area. I can't be sure, not really observing in the past, but I think parents have brought in small strollers regardless and most of the time I hardly see zookeepers in there that may tell you not to bring it in. The only thing is it may be difficult to steer if it's crowded with school groups. But if brought in, the path goes behind the waterfall since a stroller wouldn't work on the shaky bridge and there is an elevator by the stairs that leads to the second floor platform. I wanted to give you a warning so you'd be prepared!
 
Another great review, SnowLeopard, but I tend to agree with JBNBSN99 on the North American Living Museum. I found it to be one of the more unique zoo exhibits in the nation, and certainly one of the most educational. You didn't say much about the "Cave" exhibit in the EASTERN FOREST building. That small exhibit was a runner-up for the AZA Exhibit of the Year award many years ago. I think it's still great. That Crow exhibit used to be a very colorful exhibit of local songbirds. And while you've seen better desert exhibits, quite honestly Tulsa's indoor desert is still one of very few that is an extensive as it is. How many (non-southwestern) zoos have living saguaro cacti growing in their desert exhibit. I would agree, however, that they need to update that initial bear exhibit, and I'll bet they will.

I'd love to hear what those other 5 NALM buildings were supposed to be.
 
I'd love to hear what those other 5 NALM buildings were supposed to be.

I would too! I have an old design map of the place and it doesn't mention any other buildings. I can only guess at 1 further building - Great Plains.
 
I would too! I have an old design map of the place and it doesn't mention any other buildings. I can only guess at 1 further building - Great Plains.

I would also suggest: Pacific Coast and perhaps Mountains. But what else?
 
I have an old design map of the place and it doesn't mention any other buildings. I can only guess at 1 further building - Great Plains.

I'd guess Great Plains, Rocky Mountains, and Western Forest right off the start...then maybe a freshwater building and a saltwater building.

Overall, I think Snowleopard's review of Tulsa Zoo was pretty accurate for the most part - a bit harsh at times but also a bit kind at times. As said by others, that cave exhibit in Eastern Forests is definitely one of the best of its kind and I'm a bit surprised he overlooked it. The Southwest Desert exhibit is also above average, in my opinion, especially for a non-desert zoo. Tulsa Zoo definitely has some tremendous financial obstacles to overcome in the next several years, but if you love zoos, it's worth seeing.
 
I love reading all of the replies to my reviews, so keep them coming and I'll address the Tulsa Zoo comments here:

The 5 other potential NALM buildings were: grasslands, rivers, mountains, boreal forest...and I can't quite recall exactly what the other one was. I gleaned that information from an elderly chap who was a docent, and it would be quite the coincidence if he were reading this as he certainly knew his zoo inside and out!

I suppose that I did gloss over the cave section of the Eastern Forest building, but my reviews are already about 7-8 pages on the computer and I can't fit everything in...haha.:) I've seen much nicer cave areas at Omaha, Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum and Fort Worth (the excellent mining shaft area in "Texas Wild!") but I didn't harshly dismiss the cave section at Tulsa. Also, the educational opportunities and signage within the NALM complex are at times impressive, but I saw at least 100 visitors walk right on by and not read even one sentence in that area of the zoo let alone actually study the museum artifacts. I enjoyed ticking another zoo off of my lifetime list, but there are at least 50 better zoos in America than the Tulsa Zoo & Living Museum.
 
DAY 7: Sunday, July 18th

Zoo/Aquarium Review #5: Kansas City Zoo

Kansas City Zoo’s website:

The Kansas City Zoo

Zoo Map:

http://www.kansascityzoo.org/_FileLibrary/FileImage/2010 6x16 map for web.pdf

Kansas City Zoo is clearly a “Jekyll and Hyde” zoo, as the African section is a brilliant 100 acres that is at times quite outstanding, while the rest of the zoo is average in places and borderline shocking in its Tiger Trail area. The strenuous walking distances and awkward layout makes it a challenging zoo to stroll around, but my wife and I certainly got a workout as we pushed our daughter around in her heavy stroller. The temperature, as it was in Tulsa the day before, was around 40 degrees Celsius (around 100 Fahrenheit) and so we were caked with sweat which ironically seemed to add to the “African experience”!

THE BEST:

Africa – Where to begin? This area is an eye-popping 100 acres, and it is the #1 rated African area of any North American zoo. I’m actually quite intrigued to see if there is a zoo in the world (naturally excluding safari parks) with such an extensive list of species, on around 100 acres of land. The chimpanzee exhibit is a contender for the greatest zoo exhibit I’ve seen in my life (more on that later) and it is 3 acres in size and full of a massive forest that contains zero hotwire. I was told that the gorilla exhibit, including the indoor area, is 1.6 acres in size, and the elephant paddock must be at least 2 acres. However, huge enclosures means a lot of walking, the one major drawback to the area.

The list of species is astonishing and rather comprehensive of most major African animals:
- Elephant, black rhino, nile hippo
- Lion, leopard, cheetah, serval, black-footed cat
- African wild dog, black-backed jackal, bat-eared fox
- Scimitar-horned oryx, impala, giraffe, zebra, lesser kudu, blue duiker, red- flanked duiker, yellow-backed duiker, dik-dik, bongo
- Warthog, red river hog
- Gorilla, chimpanzee, red-capped mangabey, black mangabey, guinea baboon, red ruffed lemur
- Meerkat, rock hyrax
- Leopard tortoise, slender-snouted crocodile, black-throated monitor, Aldabra tortoise, African spurred tortoise
- African crowned crane, southern ground hornbill, saddle-billed stork, masked lovebird, silvery-cheeked hornbill, ostrich, bateleur eagle, lappet-faced vulture, kori bustard, secretary bird, assorted finches and other smaller birds.

The chimpanzee exhibit is massive on such a scale that it is literally impossible to see the back of the enclosure. There is a “chimp classroom” with high viewing windows that look out onto an enormous landscape that on my visit revealed nothing but lush scenery. Outside there is a winding trail that runs alongside the mammoth enclosure, which has a clear-cut area that runs the length of the exhibit. Farther back is a thick, atmospheric jungle that is wildly overgrown and the chimpanzee troop (almost 20) have full access to the entire area. For 10 minutes I waited patiently as I strolled all along the area taking numerous photos, and nothing happened whatsoever.

Then a thrilling occurrence made me fall in love with the exhibit, as one-by-one a troop of about 8 chimps came out from the dense foliage in single file. From photos no one would ever know that the shots were not taken from the wild, and for the next 30 minutes my wife, daughter and I sat and watched at least 12 of the zoo’s 19 or so chimps rummage through the grass, violently attack each other with long sticks (somewhat scary to see the rippling muscles) and gaze at a 2 year-old baby who was the highlight of the day. The enclosure is something that is lush, green, and freakishly large and set in a deep jungle….and if a visitor is patient and willing to wait then an amazing moment can occur as the animals can get within inches of humans. Analyzing only single-species exhibits (not massive complexes) the 3-acre chimp exhibit is just about on par with the gorilla habitats at the Bronx Zoo. Simply and utterly brilliant, and worth the price of admission if one were to leave right then and there.

The gorilla habitat is huge (just like Sedgwick County, Cheyenne Mountain and Saint Louis on this trip) and anything less than half an acre for gorillas is not really up to snuff these days – it makes me laugh when zoos like Brookfield have gorillas in tiny, all-indoor concrete hellholes when so many zoos have lush, 1-2 acre jungles; the African elephant paddock is long and narrow and we watched the 5 pachyderms give a lesson in painting (I’m not joking here); the guinea baboon yard is about half an acre and positively brilliant to watch the monkeys of assorted ages interact with each other; the giraffe/antelope, ostrich/zebra enclosure must be at the very least 5 acres or more in size; the lion enclosure is massive and sloped to allow lots of dense undergrowth on the edges; the cheetah yard is lengthy and very impressive…and overall there is not too much to quibble about in this gargantuan area of the zoo. We spent over 4 hours at the zoo and only then finally left the African section…sweaty and tired and ready to eventually see what else the zoo had to offer.

I could point out that the crocodile pool is a bit small, the hippo yard is average at best, the black-footed cats, servals and bat-eared foxes all have small yards…but 90% of the African section blows many other African savannas out of the water. Most zoos on the planet probably wish that they had anything even close to the quality that Kansas City does in its African expanse that at times made me feel as if I were actually trudging through Kenya, Zaire (should be Democratic Republic of Congo), Botswana, Tanzania and Uganda…all nations featured in specific sections of this enormous African complex.

River Otters – This shiny new exhibit opened in 2009 and is badly needed to convince visitors that there are animals near the entrance of the zoo. It is next to an average-looking trumpeter swan pool.

THE AVERAGE:

Tropics Building – This building was extensively renovated in 2009 and it now features 5 different exhibits that are quite visually appealing. There is a golden-lion tamarin enclosure; a green aracari/freshwater stingray enclosure; an Asian small-clawed otter/white-cheeked gibbon enclosure; a blue monkey/mona monkey/African spurred tortoise enclosure; and a white-faced saki monkey/prehensile-tailed porcupine/crested screamer/capybara enclosure. I really enjoyed this building, and the interesting mixed-species exhibits made it worthwhile. I believe that only Omaha and Kansas City have the beautiful blue monkeys (and there was a baby at Kansas), while the real gem was the otter/gibbon combination. The exhibit seems to be of average quality at first glance, but there is a set of viewing windows set into the floor and I watched the 3 otters swim underneath my feet on numerous occasions. At the same time I took photos of one of the gibbons as it crossed over the viewing windows over my head. What an awesome idea! The gibbon and otters both crisscrossed and were extremely active mammals, making for a terrifically popular exhibit.

Australia – After the 100 acre monster that is the African complex the rest of the zoo feels quaint and outdated. The Aussie section begins brightly, with a themed railway station and café, along with the ubiquitous gift shop. The animal exhibits are all of average quality (walk-through aviary, walk-through red kangaroo enclosure, emu, New Guinea singing dogs, tree kangaroos in a poor enclosure) and the small museum and sheep shearing station are unique but not especially noteworthy. At least there is more on offer here from the continent down under than what is usually shown in North American zoos.

KidZone – A small petting zoo, a tiny building with about 9 snake terrariums, lorikeets in a crappy walk-through metal cage, but the saving grace is “Discovery Barn” with its innovative children’s activities, meerkats, lemurs, squirrel monkeys and few other kid-friendly critters. The Peek-A-Boo Tree is quite amusing, as is the carousel ride with its exotic animals. This area is borderline “worst” but barely squeaks into my “average” category.

Tropical Animals – This row of wood-and-wire enclosures is near the Tropics building and contains such animals as tamanduas, green-winged macaws, military macaws, agoutis, red-handed tamarins, peacocks, green iguanas, swainson’s toucans, golden lion tamarins and spectacled owls. As basic as it gets.

THE WORST:

The Zoo’s Layout – This may appear to be a weird item to list in a “worst” category but this zoo deserves to be reprimanded for an awful layout. The trail through the centre of the zoo to the 100-acre African area is entirely too long, and it includes going up and down a lengthy hill. There are trams that come and go at odd intervals, but they cost extra and aren’t reliable in terms of time. Along the way there are zero exhibits and nothing but baking cement and dust clouds. Also, the African section is so widespread that there are some long walks between exhibits, and when one is finished the main loop there is an offshoot path over a bridge to see the gorillas, bongos, red river hogs, etc, that takes an inordinate amount of time to cross. So all visitors walk far out of their way, see a loop of exhibits, and then come back in the exact same direction.

The same applies to the Asian and Australian areas, as visitors have to walk to the north part of the zoo, see the two loops, and then walk all the way back again. To top it all off the entrance is highly disappointing, as once again there is a scarcity of decent exhibits and so one begins to wonder if there are actually animals at the zoo. To cap it all off the zoo’s parking lot is miniscule, forcing many families to walk great distances just to enter the zoo…only to have to walk many more kilometers in order to find the African wildlife that they have come to observe.

Tiger Trail – Bring on the bulldozers!!! The absolute worst tiger cage that I have ever seen features two Sumatrans just waiting to die so that they can be put out of their miserable existence. The worst outdoor orangutan cage that I’ve ever seen, as there are 5 orangs crammed into a tiny holding area as well as a giant metal hamster cage that must get incredibly hot in the baking Kansas summers. Francois’ langurs, red pandas, demoiselle cranes, and a binturong complete the tiny loop that is an embarrassment to all concerned. If you ever visit this zoo please skip this section as it taints the entire experience.

Sea Lion Pool – Badly outdated and in need of either a desperate overhaul or a wrecking crew. How can a sea lion pool be so poorly conceived?

OVERALL:

Kansas City Zoo has such a brilliant African zone that I highly recommend anyone visiting who loves and adores top-quality zoo exhibit complexes. However, the rest of the zoo is a major letdown and thus it is tough to really classify this zoo by looking at everything that it contains. To have Tiger Trail still in existence is bemusing, even if there is a docent near the orangutan hamster cage looking guilty at the prospect of giving a keeper talk in front of such a shockingly awful “Primadome”. There are signs of recent improvements, as the river otter exhibit is very appealing, the Tropics building is pleasant and interesting, the new polar bear exhibit opens within the next few weeks (however I took a couple of photos through holes in the work-fence and the enclosure looks to be of average quality for the solitary male bear that will reside there) and there are plans for a new penguin habitat in 2011.

If I stick to concentrating on the positives then I’ll point out that the 3-acre chimpanzee exhibit is extraordinary if the chimps show their faces out from the dense undergrowth, the gorilla yard is as impressive as many others in American zoos, the guinea baboon exhibit is terrific, the lion and cheetah yards are huge, and most of the African area is of an incredibly high quality. However, the sheer size and scope of the area is so vast that it makes the rest of the zoo weak in comparison.
 
Excellent reviews of both zoos! I never knew Kansas City's chimp exhibit was that impressive! Question: How were the black rhino and african leopard exhibits? Ive heard they have a pretty good leopard exhibit, and from photos the rhino yard seems spacious with a lot of mud, perfect for rhinos.

In response to what you said about the Tulsa Zoo polar bear exhibit, I visited the Erie Zoo yesterday with my volunteer group at the Cleveland Zoo, and it made our grotto in Cleveland look like a paradise, and ours is pretty bad. The Erie Zoo's polar bear exhibit might just be the worst exhibit in any American Zoo. Its basically just a square block of concrete with a small pool surrounded by a steep massive moat that is larger than the actual area the polar bear is given. Very sad.

Anyways, thanks for the reviews!
 
Good reviews Snow Leopard.

I thought the red kangaroo exhibit at KC was actually quite good. And what makes the tree kangaroo exhibit poor? The cage itself? Space wise, it's quite good imo.

The leopard exhibit is decent Black Rhino, but nothing great. The rhino exhibit is very good.
 
At Kansas City, were you able to see the jackals? Was there anything happening in the space-age former primate house?

You must be exhausted from Saint Louis Zoo today and trying to type a long review of the extensive facility!
 
@BlackRhino: the 3-acre chimpanzee exhibit at Kansas City is incredible and now one of my all-time favourite zoo exhibits. The black rhino paddock there is fairly large, and it comes with mud wallows and is more than adequate for the one rhino that I saw. (The black rhino enclosure at the Saint Louis Zoo might be even better, with close-up viewing and a lush backdrop). The leopard exhibit at Kansas City is a wire cage that has a section where the leopard could walk over the heads of visitors into a smaller area on the other side of the walking trail.

@mweb08: the Matschie's tree kangaroo exhibit has a metal door that goes "clang" everytime someone enters the walk-through enclosure, and the ugly cage is mainly a visitor pathway with a barren area for the roos. The walk-through red kangaroo area is much better, but I preferred a similar experience at the Detroit Zoo and I've also been to loads of Aussie zoos and of course down there the roos are everywhere!:)

@geomorph: I did not see the jackals in the rotation exhibit, as there were 5 African wild dogs in there on my visit. The Saint Louis Zoo is incredible and clearly one of the 10 best in all of North America, thus when I get around to typing up a review it will be quite comprehensive. Both Sedgwick County and Saint Louis have impressed me tremendously, and I'm glad that I have those two massive zoos under my belt.
 
Oh, late to the party again!

DAY 5: Friday, July 16th

Zoo/Aquarium Review #3: Sedgwick County Zoo


The main reason why this zoo is not as highly lauded as perhaps San Diego or Bronx is that it is inland and does not receive anywhere near the same degree of exposure.

Also, keep inn mind that SCZ is not in a major coastal city with heavy media presence and is a municipal run facility. So very different circumstances, support and budget.

THE BEST:

Downing Gorilla Forest – This area was built in 2004 and seems to ape (pardon the pun) the brilliant “Congo Gorilla Forest” at the Bronx Zoo.
That was self-conscious. This exhibit was fully inspired by CGF - both the donors and the zoo looked to the Bronx as a model

Enjoying being along for your trip!
 
DAY 8: Monday, July 19th

Zoo/Aquarium Review #6: Saint Louis Zoo

Saint Louis Zoo’s website:

Saint Louis Zoo

Zoo Map:

http://www.stlzoo.org/downloads/STLZooMap2009.pdf

The Saint Louis Zoo is a large zoo with an enormous collection of creatures all over the grounds. The reptile/amphibian building is incredibly diverse, the bird section is huge, the hoofstock section is larger than what is found at many other zoos, there are terrific pachyderm exhibits, the insectarium is simply awesome, the primate area is diverse, and Saint Louis seems to be a top 5 or 10 zoo in just about every category. There is a lot of history there and in fact 2010 marks the 100th anniversary of this acclaimed zoo and I briefly toured the free “Zootennial” exhibit in Peabody Hall.

Coming up on my road trip there will be a lot of average but enjoyable zoos, so I’m thankful to having recently seen two of my all-time favourites in Sedgwick County and Saint Louis. The exciting thing about each of those zoos is that they are already brilliant and yet have extensive master plans for even more improvements! Saint Louis has $120 million to spend on updating the sea lion pool, the bear grottoes, and many other exhibits. Both of those are without a doubt in North America’s best 10 zoos (if not top 5), and the other two zoos on this 30 zoo trip that I’m looking forward to the most are North Carolina and Dallas. We’ll see if those two can compete with the likes of San Diego, Bronx, Omaha, Sedgwick County, Saint Louis, Columbus, Woodland Park, Miami, San Diego Safari Park, Oklahoma City, Detroit and Minnesota…as in some type of order those are my favourite dozen zoos on the continent. I’m guessing that of all the many zoos that I have left to see in the next month that North Carolina and Dallas might be the only two that have a chance to crack my favourite dozen.

On a side note, during our visit there was an incredibly powerful storm that featured loud cracks of thunder and streaking lightning. Power was lost all over the zoo, and employees were running around and yelling at each other as the wind howled like a banshee. We were eating lunch in the main restaurant when the storm hit, and when the wind died down we went out to see the reminder of the zoo only to be waylaid by a furious pounding of rain that was so loud that we had to raise our voices to be heard. The orangutan exhibit turned out to be our sanctuary, and it was intriguing to see two of the red apes ignore the weather and still move about their lushly planted exhibit. After another 15 minutes of torrential rain the storm passed and everyone poured out from their hiding places. The zoo was crazily busy even for a Monday, but it is free to everyone and regularly receives more than 3 million visitors per year. Thank goodness we did not attend on a weekend!

The zoo is divided up into 6 major sections, with many smaller pieces within those broad guidelines. The 6 areas are: River’s Edge, The Wild, Historic Hill, Red Rocks, Discovery Corner and Lakeside Crossing. I’ll review smaller zones of the zoo within those 6 main areas, but I’ll also list where each exhibit is found.

THE BEST:

River’s Edge – There are animals from 4 different continents represented here (South America, Africa, Asia and North America) and this large section is only about 10 years old and very impressive. I’ve seen too many dusty and barren pachyderm yards featuring swaying mammals, and in contrast Saint Louis has absolutely terrific exhibits for Asian elephants, black rhinos and Nile hippos. The massive underwater viewing area for hippos rivals San Diego as the best I’ve ever seen, the black rhino/sacred ibis paddock is long and narrow to enable visitors to clearly see the animals, and it has a lush, green backdrop. There are actually 3 elephant paddocks, and while they are not huge there has been a lot of thought put into the design and the hidden moats make the enclosures appear to be larger than they really are. Elephants can possibly be rotated throughout the yards, and the exhibits are very scenic and seem tailor-made for both visitor viewing opportunities and animal enrichment.

This water-themed area also has these exhibits: cheetah, spotted hyena, bush dog, red river hog/bat-eared fox, capybara/giant anteater, carmine bee-eater, dwarf mongoose, fish from the Mississippi River. Everything is excellent, the entire area is lushly planted with a beautiful walking trail, and this section of the zoo is just about flawless.

Penguin & Puffin Coast – This is the premier exhibit within “The Wild” section, and it is the one and only walk-through penguin exhibit in all of North America. Rather than seeing Antarctic penguins behind glass, visitors can get close enough to actually touch the birds if they so chose due to the low glass and close proximity of the brave little creatures. There were zoo workers posted in position to stop anyone from being overly exuberant with the creatures, but it was amazing to see the birds up close and seemingly in the frozen southern part of the world. There are king, gentoo and rockhopper in the exhibit, with another area that has horned puffins, tufted puffins and king eider ducks also with only a low glass wall barrier. This area is freezing cold and visitors don’t seem to spend much time in the building as even on a muggy summer day it was unbelievably chilly and I was soon near to shivering. I can’t imagine what the exhibit would seem like in the winter, although I suppose that zoo visitors would be dressed more appropriately.

Insectarium – A geodesic dome with butterflies is of average quality, but inside this building, located in “Discovery Corner”, is a very well designed insect house that is the second best of its kind in North America. Only Cincinnati has a better insectarium, but the diversity of interesting exhibits make the Saint Louis one a place that no one should miss on any visit. I was entranced to see so many children go crazy for the bugs and creepy crawlies that were attractively exhibited.

Lipton Fragile Forest – This the great ape complex of the zoo, located in “The Wild”, with gorillas (a bachelor group), orangutans and chimpanzees in lush, large, naturalistic, modern outdoor habitats. The “Jungle of the Apes” building was closed during my visit, so I did not see the animals in their night quarters, but like most American zoos the apes had massive, extensively planted yards to roam around in. The orangutan exhibit was perhaps my favourite, with a plethora of climbing opportunities for those arboreal apes.

Herpetarium – This building, located in “Historic Hill”, was erected in 1927, and I was not expecting much from such an old structure. I’ve been in enough ancient zoo buildings to see how there are often only band-aid solutions to the ravages of time, but I was pleasantly surprised at how wonderful this reptile & amphibian house truly was. There are some average-sized terrariums scattered along the walls, but for the most part the reptile tanks were much larger than I had anticipated. There are some massive ceiling-to-wall exhibits with animals such as komodo dragons, king cobras, false gharials (two exhibits), tuataras, Yacare caiman, Chinese giant salamanders and an extensive variety of crocodilians, snakes, lizards, frogs, turtles and tortoises. Huge columns separate a central turtle/stingray exhibit from the other galleries, and it is obvious that this is clearly one of the top 5 reptile houses in North America.

Red Rocks – If you’ve ever been to San Diego Zoo before “Elephant Odyssey” was built you’ll recall that there was “Horn & Hoof Mesa” with a bewildering variety of hoofstock in a seemingly endless sea of enclosures. Saint Louis has a smaller version of that area, and I was thrilled to finally see some rare hoofstock in a major zoo. It seems that so many major American zoos (San Diego, Oklahoma City, Denver, etc) have phased out many of their hoofstock species in favour of new exhibits complexes, but Saint Louis is doggedly holding onto their impressive collection. The species found here: Somali wild ass, reticulated giraffe, Grevy’s zebra, red kangaroo, Visayan warty pig, Chacoan peccary, babirusa, okapi, bongo, gerenuk, banteng, Cuvier’s gazelle, Bactrian camel, Indian muntjac, Transcaspian urial, Chinese goral, red-flanked duiker, lowland nyala, addax, lesser kudu, Speke’s gazelle, Sichuan takin, Mhorr gazelle, as well as birds such as wattled cranes, sarus cranes, white storks, Stanley cranes, East African crowned cranes, hemeted guineafowl and ostriches.

Living World – This building, located in “Discovery Corner”, has restrooms, a gift shop, a restaurant, theaters, classrooms, a grand hall with “An Introduction to Animals” exhibit, Chinese giant salamanders and many other visitor amenities.

Love Cypress Swamp – This huge flight cage was built in time for the 1904 World’s Fair, and is found in “Historic Hill” and is the oldest structure at the zoo. There are now 16 North American bird species found here, including spoonbills, cormonrants, herons, ibises, egrets and other waterfowl.

Sea Lion Pool – This is an outdated pool found in “Historic Hill” that is going to receive a multi-million dollar makeover that will be completed by 2012. This exciting development is detailed on a large sign at the zoo, and there will be a tunnel with underwater viewing over the heads of visitors, huge glass windows and an expanded habitat that will include space for a new sea lion show. Nearby exhibits with North American river otters and a startling abundance of waterfowl are attractive but average.

Big Cat Country – These exhibits in “Red Rocks” are borderline average, but they squeak into my “best” category due to their large size. A pair of lions is in a massive pit, but one that is huge, grassy and with some tall trees. The lioness was actually asleep far up in the foliage, as she was resting in a crook of the tree. There is a smaller and fairly standard Amur tiger enclosure, one of the largest (and surprisingly open-topped) jaguar exhibits that I’ve ever seen, and then wire mesh exhibits that were of average quality for Amur leopards, snow leopards (two enclosures) and pumas.

THE AVERAGE:

Bird House – I enjoy ratities, raptors, penguins and many larger bird species, but my wife and I both care little for smaller songbirds or even colourful perching birds. However, this 1930 building in “Historic Hill” has low lighting and a fine steel wire that makes it seem as if there are little or no barriers between visitors and the birds. If you are into birds then the collection is vast. There is an outdoor Bird Garden with average exhibits for bald eagles, bateleur eagles, cinerous vultures, white-naped cranes, Cabot’s tragopans, white-crested laughing thrushes, vulturine guineafowls, blue-bellied rollers, white-crested turacos, white-headed buffalo weavers, speckled pigeons, blue-faced honeyeaters, kookaburras, helmeted curassows, collie’s jays and red-legged seriemas.

Lakeside Crossing – A series of attractive waterfowl pools, with loads of visitor amenities and train-station stops.

THE WORST:

Primate House – Located in “Historic Hill” this 1930’s-era structure has a fantastic collection but so-so exhibits. Some of the primates have access to the outdoors in small wire/mesh enclosures, but many are indoors for life. Tastefully done and not nearly as bad as the prisons at Tulsa or Cheyenne Mountain Zoo (shudder!!) but still disappointing for a zoo of the immense quality of Saint Louis. Here are the species found in this building: Coquerel’s sifaka, mongoose lemur, ring-tailed lemur, black lemur, black-and-white ruffed lemur, lion-tailed macaque, colobus monkey, Francois’ langur, spectacled langur, golden-headed lion tamarin, white-faced saki and pygmy marmoset.

Bear Pits – Located in “The Wild” there are 4 grottoes that the zoo director and everyone else in existence has acknowledged are not just subpar but downright atrocious. There are thankfully no longer polar bears at the zoo (they escaped to greener pastures) but the four species are: spectacled, American black, sun and grizzly. These pits are due to be demolished as part of the $120 million redevelopment of the zoo.

Extra Charges – I know that this might be a touchy subject as the zoo is free and open 363 days of the year…BUT parking is $11 unless one wants to hike from across the park, the Children’s Zoo is $4 per person and doesn’t appear to be much more than average (for once we skipped this section), and the train, carousel ride, simulator ride, 3-D movie and safari pass are all extra and I can understand those costs. The children’s zoo should definitely be free, and it was annoying to find out that the sea lion show was an additional $3 and the stingray petting zone was $3 as in the past we’ve done both of those things on more than one occasion for free. However, I fully understand that this great zoo has to generate revenue from some capacity.

OVERALL:

The Saint Louis Zoo is easily one of the most comprehensive zoos in existence. Looking at all of the hundreds of zoos found throughout North America I’d place Saint Louis in the top 10 for birds, top 10 for hoofstock, top 5 for reptiles/amphibians, top 10 for primates, top 10 for pachyderms and top 2 for insects. Other than the bear pits (which are slated to be demolished/renovated in the next few years) and the Primate House there isn’t a lot to complain about in terms of exhibitry. It is a historic, traditional zoo with the various monkey, bird and reptile houses, and I much prefer geographic zoning in modern zoos. However, at the end of this summer I’ll have to think long and hard whether or not the Saint Louis Zoo is truly impressive enough to crack my top 5 North American zoos. The zoo has $120 million in developments planned (bear pits, sea lion pool, etc) and so the economic future is very bright indeed! On my next visit, whenever that might be, this could well be close to a near-flawless zoo.
 
Back
Top