Snowleopard's 2010 Road Trip

@mweb08: I loved visiting the Philadelphia Zoo, but overall the level of exhibitry is not what it is at the truly great American zoos. At least we both agree that it is better than Los Angeles, which is a zoo that really disappointed me when I visited in 2008. I will quibble on one fact, and that is the new Primate House does actually show not just the indoor holding areas for some primates, but the ENTIRE exhibit for many of them. Squirrel monkeys, spectacled langurs, colobus monkeys and others have zero outdoor access at all, and so they are left living with metal bars, yellow steel frames and nothing but harsh cement and tile in all directions. There was some natural substrate in some of the enclosures, but that entire building is lifted directly from the 1960's.;)

Oh, I'm not saying it's a top 10 zoo or anything, just thought some of your descriptions were a bit harsh. Especially regarding the 3 exhibits I mentioned. I know some of the monkeys only have indoor exhibits, which is not good, but it's not exactly uncommon at zoos which can't keep monkeys outside year round.
 
I have to agree with snowleopard about the primates at the Philadelphia Zoo. Cool seeing Douc Langurs and I think they had a Gentle Lemur there too in the small mammal house when I was there a few years ago. Honestly though, keeping primates indoors in small, glass-fronted cages with some poles for climbing is not going to cut it. I was very surprised when I found out when this was built - it could easily have been from the 1950's or 1960's. The only exhibit I thought was ok was the outdoor one for gibbons and orangutans. At least the gibbons had trees to climb. The gorilla exhibit is how gorillas were displayed 20 or 30 years ago.

I have only seen the old bird house, so can't really comment on the renovation.

I have no problem with animals displayed in a taxonomic order if the exhibits are good. I would rather see them in a geographic or habitat based section but I would not take points away from a zoo just because they're displayed in a way you don't enjoy, if, again, the animals are in modern exhibits. The cat and bear sections were in a taxonomic order but they were nice, especially the leopard enclosure although maybe not for those particular species living in it.
 
Great reviews! I would love to see Providence's great snow leopard enclosure as great snow leopard exhibits are few and far between, and I think most of them are in the Northeast i.e RWP, Bronx, Central Park (either this or Bronx are the best), and Philly.

I'm not surprised you saw a sloth bear pacing, as even in the most naturalistic enclosures that species seems to show horrible stereotypic behavior. Although I would like to add, you can't rate an enclosure bad just because you saw an animal showing stereotypic behavior as that animal may have picked that behavior up living at another zoo in a subpar facility.

I visited the Los Angeles Zoo back in 2007 and really enjoyed my visit. I haven't seen Philly yet, but LA does have a huge elephant habitat opening up this fall which could significantly improve that zoo making it better than Philly.

Have fun at North Carolina Zoo tomorrow!
 
I would also like to add, I think its really dumb for them to put donkeys in the old elephant exhibit, as it would make much more sense to give that space to the elderly rhino living next door. She would then have an extra pool, and double the living space.

and which zoo did you honestly like better, Cleveland or Philly?
 
DAY 21, Part I: Sunday, August 1st

On Sunday, August 1st, the Snowleopard family spent just over 3 hours at the National Aquarium in Baltimore, drove about 12 minutes, and then spent just over 3 hours at the nearby Maryland Zoo. It is quite convenient for a large city to have two major animal attractions so close to each other and both were enjoyable. The aquarium is excellent and one of the best I’ve seen, while the zoo is historic and tiny but still worth a visit. I’ll post separate reviews of the two establishments, and thus this can be considered “Part I”.

Zoo/Aquarium Review # 17: National Aquarium in Baltimore

National Aquarium’s website:

National Aquarium, Baltimore | Home

Aquarium Map:

http://www.aqua.org/downloads/pdf/Map_2009June.pdf

The National Aquarium in Baltimore, not to be confused with the miniscule, one-floor National Aquarium that I visited in Washington D.C. in 2008 (even though they are both run and operated under the Baltimore site’s management), is an excellent facility that is surely one of the best aquariums in North America. With an annual attendance of around 1.4 million it was not a surprise to see it packed on a Sunday morning, and we arrived exactly at opening time of 9:00 a.m. By around 10:00 the aquarium was totally jammed with visitors. It was nice to break up the never-ending stream of zoo visits with an aquarium, although it was much more difficult now that I’m a father to a wriggling little daughter.

Strollers are not allowed in the facility due to the many narrow walkways and escalators, and thus Kylie was put into a “snugli” where she was basically strapped to my chest in a kind of front-facing backpack. Being less than 11 months of age she has a tendency to want to turn around and escape at every moment, as well as bang on the glass whenever possible. My wife and I attempt to stop her from getting overly excited, as on this trip we let her out of the stroller more and more often to explore the various attractions. The highlight was when we were the very first visitors of the day in the Primate, Cat & Aquatic complex at the Cleveland Zoo, and Kylie was let loose on the carpeted floor for a long period of time. Several staff members kept joking that there was an escaped monkey, and I impressed them when I said that she was a species of mangabey. Ahh, zoo jokes! Enough dawdling with family stories…time for a full review.

The National Aquarium is constructed on 3 different structures, called “Glass Pavilion”, “Pier 3 Pavilion” and “Pier 4 Pavilion”. All 3 are excellent, and the aquarium is expertly designed so that there are no issues with wandering pathways or dead-end zones that I found plagued both the Buffalo and Philadelphia zoos. It is nice to have large loops in zoos and aquariums, and the National Aquarium actually has a unique system of rising escalators in the Pier 3 Pavilion. Inside the 3 massive pavilions the National Aquarium also has 3 different gift shops (one of them is huge), 2 different cafes, and a 4-D Immersion Theater that for an extra cost plays 15-minute shows.

THE BEST:

Pier 3 Pavilion – This was my family’s favourite pavilion, and the one area that is packed with the most number of animals. There is an entrance that features about 10 large “Bubble Tubes”, where there are water-filled tanks with bubbles shooting up through them. Interesting but not glamorous, and this area is mainly used for a photo opportunity by visitors. After that entrance there are 5 distinct levels.

Level 1: “Wings in the Water” features a single huge tank that is filled with these species: cownose ray, roughtail ray, bullnose ray, southern stingray, pelagic stingray, spiny butterfly ray, giant guitarfish, tarpon, zebra shark, bonnethead shark, blacknose shark and a single green sea turtle that is missing a front flipper. This tank is jammed with many species, which is a hallmark of the aquarium, and it is a large and intriguing tank that was thronged with visitors. Of note is that as a visitor rises up the 5 levels this large, mixed-species tank is constantly visible by looking over the edge of an escalator.

Level 2: “Maryland: Mountains to the Sea” only has 4 exhibits, and they all shine a spotlight on local critters found in the state of Maryland. Allegheny Stream, Tidal Marsh, Coastal Beach and Atlantic Shelf are 4 large tanks that resemble museum exhibits, as there are expansive murals in the background and a well-detailed animal-filled foreground. This area is nothing special and rather small.

Level 3: “Surviving through Adaptation” has about 4 large exhibits and lots of smaller ones, and it focuses on sea creatures like electric eels that have cool adaptive qualities. Another level that is only average.

Level 4: “Sea Cliffs, Kelp Forest” Pacific Coral Reef, Amazon River Forest” is an excellent section with some fantastic exhibits. There are puffins and other sea birds in Sea Cliffs, a small Kelp Forest exhibit (puny in comparison to the awesome, overwhelming Kelp Forest complex at Monterey Bay), a very nice but average Pacific Coral Reef tank and the best section by far is the Amazon River Forest. It pales in comparison to “Amazon Rising” at Shedd Aquarium, but seeing pygmy marmosets, caiman, giant amazon river turtles and many other species of turtles (there are seemingly hundreds of turtles at this aquarium) and fish make the 2 enormous tanks borderline brilliant. The views from the Harbour View Café are spectacular, and a reminder of how the aquarium has a terrific location on the Baltimore waterfront.

Level 5: “Upland Tropical Rain Forest, Hidden Life” features a lush but disappointingly empty walk-through jungle. There was a two-toed sloth slumbering in a tree, a few scarlet ibises and other birds, but the golden lion tamarins were not in sight and for the most part we were glancing around at a beautiful but strangely silent jungle.

A great section of the Pier 3 Pavilion is the exit, as there is a 5-storey walkway that winds around a massive “Atlantic Coral Reef”, horseshoe-shaped tank that contains some enormous fish. On the bottom level is the “Open Ocean” tank that has a number of sharks prowling the depths. There are nurse sharks, sand tiger sharks, sandbar sharks and other huge sharks in this tank.

Glass Pavilion – This huge pavilion is spectacular on the outside, and just as amazing on the inside. It is called “Animal Planet Australia: Wild Extremes” and features the AZA Best Exhibit award-winning Aussie zone. The entire structure cost $75 million, and is only about 4 years old. A crashing waterfall and superbly designed rockwork precipices tower over visitors as they cross a bridge and stroll through the cavernous hallways that make up the area. The only downside is that this zone ends sooner than it should and is not quite as large as it first appears, but there is a long list of amazing creatures that are difficult to spot outside of Oz. I managed to list a number of the animals below, but I omitted numerous fish species and probably a few birds as well.

There are free-flying birds such as eastern rosellas, northern rosellas, sulfur crested cockatoos, galahs, rainbow lorikeets and cockatiels, and jam-packed tanks with species often rarely seen in North American zoos. Here is a partial list: various finches, kookaburras (free-flying), frilled lizard, northern death adder, Merten’s water monitor, central bearded dragon, Hosmer’s skink and at least 2 other types of skink, spiny-tailed monitor, eastern carpet python, water python, eastern water dragon, freshwater crocodile, black-headed python, northern snake-necked turtle, soft-shelled snake-necked turtle, pig-nosed turtle, Northern Australian snapping turtle, Jardine river turtle, Northern red-faced turtle, saw-shelled turtle, Mary River turtle and fish such as gulf saratoga, barrumundi, sooty grunter, yabby, tailed sole, western rainbowfish, sleepy cod, giant gudgeon, freshwater whipray, lesser salmon catfish, black catfish, toothless catfish and shovel-nosed catfish.

THE AVERAGE:

Pier 4 Pavilion – This area is very nicely designed, with a walkway from the first two pavilions, but the large dolphin pool is something that I’ve seen a few times before. By being AZA members we got into the $30 aquarium for free (and we’ve received admittance for free at practically every single zoo on the trip so far) but we did pay $3 each to watch the 25-minute dolphin show. It was very educational, with 2 large screens that diverted the attention of onlookers, but also quite enjoyable. Perhaps the best dolphin show that I’ve seen (and I think that I’m up to about 6-7 now) is the one at the Indianapolis Zoo, as that show is top-notch and also has the added bonus of the world’s only Dolphin Dome.

Other than the dolphin show there is underwater viewing of that species, a small children’s discovery gallery and “Jellies Invasion: Oceans Out Of Balance”, a small but well-done jellyfish gallery.

THE WORST:

Nothing!

OVERALL:

The National Aquarium in Baltimore is definitely worth visiting, and it is one of the finest aquariums that I’ve ever seen. I’ve given it a fairly glowing review here, but in all honesty it is most definitely not as impressive as America’s “Big 3” of Shedd, Georgia and Monterey Bay. Those 3 are all a cut above Baltimore, and they are so magnificent that in my opinion there really is no comparison. However, Baltimore does have its fans and once I visit Tennessee Aquarium this week perhaps I’ll figure out how close Tennessee and Baltimore are to each other in terms of quality. In terms of great North American aquariums it is interesting at how spread out they are geographically. There is Monterey Bay on the southwest coast, Baltimore on the northeast coast, Georgia inland and near the southeast coast, Dallas World Aquarium in Texas, and Shedd beneath the Great Lakes. The northwest even has Vancouver, which advertises itself as the 5th largest aquarium in North America. It seems as if wherever you live in the United States there is a world-class aquarium within a few hours from your hometown.
 
DAY 21, Part II: Sunday, August 1st

On Sunday, August 1st, the Snowleopard family spent just over 3 hours at the National Aquarium in Baltimore, drove about 12 minutes, and then spent just over 3 hours at the nearby Maryland Zoo. It is quite convenient for a large city to have two major animal attractions so close to each other and both were enjoyable. The aquarium is excellent and one of the best I’ve seen, while the zoo is historic and tiny but still worth a visit. I’ll post separate reviews of the two establishments, and thus this can be considered “Part II”.

Zoo/Aquarium Review # 18: Maryland Zoo

Maryland Zoo’s website:

Our Zoo Is More Fun

Zoo Map:

http://www.marylandzoo.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Zoo-Map-legal-size-rev.pdf

Maryland Zoo is a small zoo that has 3 distinct sections that are separated from the main entrance area. Polar Bear Watch, African Journey and Maryland Wilderness are the 3 zones, and they all have a few highlights.

THE BEST:

Polar Bear Watch – There are 3 tiny mesh enclosures that are far too small and crappy for ravens, snowy owls and an Arctic fox, but those are meaningless to many visitors as the 3 polar bears are the main attraction. There are 2 bear enclosures that are divided by a massive, real-life Arctic Tundra Buggy that was once used in the city of Churchill, in Manitoba, Canada. That location is widely known as the “polar bear capital of the world”, and there is even a large sign proclaiming that statement at this zoo.

In terms of visitor viewing opportunities this exhibit is absolutely outstanding. The first polar bear enclosure has enormous viewing windows that offer up underwater viewing, and the second enclosure has a large set of windows for close-up images of the bruins. Visitors can climb into the tundra buggy and read the interesting literature pasted on the walls, sit in the seats, and gaze at either exhibit from two long rows of viewing windows. There is a 14 year-old bear and two bears that are in their mid-20’s, and on my visit it didn’t appear that the bears could cross over from one enclosure to the next. The enclosures themselves are not overly large for the bears, but they have rocky areas, lots of thick grass, and impressive pools. Other than the size of the enclosures I was content with what I saw on my visit, and all of the zoo visitors around me were in awe at how close they could get to the bears.

THE AVERAGE:

African Journey – There is a fantastic, lush, gargantuan exhibit for sitatunga/West African black crowned cranes/white storks that is very impressive; a so-so enclosure for Demoiselle cranes and lappet-faced vultures; a packed spur-thighed tortoise enclosure; large and small cheetah yards for separated cats; warthogs; lions; giraffes; okapis; a decent but dated elephant yard with a mother and child in one enclosure and a head-bobbing adult in the second enclosure; a large African leopard exhibit with a huge tree for climbing; a pleasant walk-through aviary for African birds; a fairly small metal cage for red ruffed lemurs; a large but ugly metal cage for 9 chimpanzees that does feature lush grass and a few climbing opportunities; a “Chimpanzee Forest” building with the indoor holding area for the chimps, colobus monkeys in with rock hyraxes, slender-snouted crocodiles and Coquerel’s sifakas; a decent white rhino paddock for two rhinos; a very large yard for ostriches and zebras; a massive but old African penguin/white-breasted cormorant island with water that is far too shallow; and an enormous savanna with addra gazelles, greater kudu, saddle-billed storks and southern hornbills.

Some of the hoofstock exhibits are quite impressive (particularly the gorgeous sitatunga enclosure) but overall there are numerous African displays in American zoos that are far superior. The lemur, chimpanzee and penguin exhibits in particular all seemed dated to me, although the animals were all quite active in those 3 areas of the African section.

Maryland Wilderness – The third and final section of the zoo is an 8.5 acre children’s area that is quite pleasant and geared specifically towards children. There are some cute and innovative ideas, such as lilypads across an actual waterway, an underwater river otter tunnel, a giant tree with a slide in it, pop-up tunnels in an enclosure, a cave with plenty of small critters in terrariums, and of course the obligatory farmyard. It seems as if every single zoo that I visit has a red barn, a petting zoo and a bunch of domestic animals in standard farmyard cubicles.

This large kid’s zone is divided up into 7 areas: Bog, Marsh, Stream, Cave, Woodlands, Meadow and Farmyard. For all of the unique ideas in this multi-acre area the main flaw is the lack of animals. The walk-through aviary has a few species of waterfowl, but we had to search high and low just to find a handful of ducks. The beautiful river otter exhibit unveiled no otters, and the snapping turtle and red fox were also nowhere to be seen in their enclosures. There are plenty of invertebrates, bats, reptiles and amphibians in small tanks, but no showcase animal other than perhaps the otters.

Also, there was not 1, not 2, not 3 but bizarrely 4 empty exhibits in the area! At the height of summer, in the peak season for all northern zoos, on a beautiful sunny Sunday…and there are 4 empty exhibits in the same area? I understand that many zoos undergo construction in the off-season, but to have clumsily written signs saying “empty exhibit” in August is simply poor organization. Also, the pop-up tunnels for children are a great idea and I’ve often seen them in use in prairie dog and meerkat exhibits at various zoos. Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo even has them in their gorilla enclosure! However, Maryland has 3 pop-up tunnels in their eastern box turtle exhibit, and I’m not making that up. Turtles! My wife and I saw a grand total of 2 turtles in the enclosure, and they were both moving at the speed of a glacier. What is the point in having non-active animals with kids getting excited to pop-up into the area?

THE WORST:

Entrance – Other than a black-tailed prairie dog exhibit there aren’t any animals anywhere near the historic and tiny entrance gate. Visitors are forced to either load all of their belongings (a lot of gear if you have a child) onto a tram or else take a 10-minute walk through a forested area to actually reach the main part of the zoo. I didn’t mind the walk, as it enabled me to take some cool photos of abandoned hoofstock yards that used to be full of antelope back in some other bygone era.

What is with zoos such as Maryland, Kansas City and Binder Park having large portions of the grounds off in the distance? When I arrive at a new zoo, excited to begin my journey into the unknown, I am not impressed when I have to hike up a 10-minute hill just to see my first furry critter or take a tram with a hundred sweating primates. About a year ago I read a lengthy article online all about first impressions at zoos, as the Minnesota Zoo is currently planning construction for a grand new set of animal exhibits near the entrance. Woodland Park deliberately built a $6.5 million penguin habitat directly inside their new entrance area, and many zoos have premier, eye-catching exhibits that create great first impressions for visitors. Maryland has no food or animals at the entrance, and it was dull and easily one of the worst entrances I’ve seen on this road trip. Even the zoo sign is boring!

OVERALL:

Maryland Zoo has a terrific polar bear exhibit that is a bit on the small side but brilliant for visitors, an average African section that has a decent set of enclosures, and a children’s zone that has the potential to be amazing with a few minor changes. The main flaws to the zoo are its totally impractical entrance and its limited size. I saw some young adults skip the children’s section (they didn’t seem to be too intrigued by the eastern box turtles) and so once they watched the polar bears and took the African loop then they would probably finish the zoo in about an hour and a half. We saw everything on our visit, took loads of photos, had lunch and only spent just over 3 hours on the grounds.

I know from press releases over the last few years that this zoo is struggling for funding, and the long-delayed expansion of the elephant yard was at one time a top priority. There is certainly the space for a large expansion elsewhere around the zoo, but I’m not sure what is planned for the immediate future. Maryland Zoo is an enjoyable little facility to visit, and for the most part the exhibits are quite good, but it is far too small and limited to be compared to the great zoos throughout the United States.
 
re: Maryland Zoo entrance:

When I visited in 2005, it was as you describe - all of the zoo was set further back. What it looked like was the old original cages were in the front and instead of spending money and time to slowly demolish and rebuild them (while keeping visitors in the unaffected areas), they just started in an undeveloped area behind the existing zoo. I would assume they are going to demolish and renovate the front part as money becomes available. There were two paths, the one you described with old empty and grassy hoofstock yards (nicely shaded and could still be used IMO), and a central one that maybe is now closed with a series of old cages and grottoes that were covered with plywood.
 
Concerning the aquarium, I'm glad you liked it. I do think it's better than Shedd though.

Concerning the zoo, some points:

- Why did you separate the rhino's from the ostrich/zebra's? They are in the same exhibit.

- Both aviaries were knocked down this past winter due to massive storms, so that may be the reason why there wasn't much in there. They were not even back up when I visited about two months ago.

- There's more than 3 elephants unless something has changed.

- Concerning the Maryland Wilderness, I thought that would end up in your best section, but I guess the misfortune with seeing animals hurt that. Yes, they don't have greatly exciting animals other than the otters, but that otter exhibit is the best I've seen for the otters and the rest of the section is very nicely done imo. It's also considered one of the best children's zoos by the America's Best Zoos book.

- With the Chimp exhibit, the cage is not very good to look at, but it's a solid exhibit for the animals and has glass viewing at least.

- Regarding the African Journey as a whole, I think the newer section of it is very good, while the elephant, giraffe, penguin, and chimp areas are average. You've been to a lot more zoos than I, but I haven't seen these numerous hoofstock yards that are far superior to the two top hoofstock yards there.

- I do agree that the entrance is weak and they should add to the prairie dogs. I'd suggest a Yellowstone themed exhibit.

-I agree that the penguin exhibit is dated, they do plan on a new exhibit for them according to the person I emailed with.

- The zoo is certainly light on overall species and size (I wouldn't use the word tiny though), but it has a good core of the most important animals and for someone like myself who sees most of the animals exhibited in zoos often, I would rather go to a zoo like Maryland than a zoo like LA where, although they have more animals, the quality is not as good imo.
 
RE: Maryland Zoo
If you read our review of this zoo in America's Best Zoos and then read my earlier review in my 1994 book (The Zoo Book), you will note some huge differences. In the 15 years between my 2 books, this zoo had some severe funding problems and nearly shut down completely. Instead, it closed over half of the zoo's exhibits, which is the reason that entrance area is so empty. This is where all of these outdated exhibits once were. SnowLeopard often says "Bulldoze it!" when he sees and outdated grotto or similar old exhibit -- well the Maryland Zoo (then the Baltimore Zoo) actually did it!

The Children's Zoo here makes me sad. In my first book, I named it the nation's #1 best children's zoo and they put up a big banner announcing that status. Back then all of those innovative exhibits were filled with attractive animals. The pop-up exhibit had woodchucks, and there were also black bears, red foxes, skunks, and much more. We (at America's Best Zoos) still think this is a fun area for children, but it's not like it once was, back in the early 1990s. SnowLeopard is right -- it needs more animals.

One thing SnowLeopard rarely mentions is children's rides. This zoo has a wide variety of them, which makes the Children's Zoo all the more fun.

Polar Bear Watch is a great example of what I like best in zoos -- an exhibit that takes you to another place on earth. In this case, it's very easy to imagine that you are in Churchill, Manitoba.
 
RE: Maryland Zoo
If you read our review of this zoo in America's Best Zoos and then read my earlier review in my 1994 book (The Zoo Book), you will note some huge differences. In the 15 years between my 2 books, this zoo had some severe funding problems and nearly shut down completely. Instead, it closed over half of the zoo's exhibits, which is the reason that entrance area is so empty. This is where all of these outdated exhibits once were. SnowLeopard often says "Bulldoze it!" when he sees and outdated grotto or similar old exhibit -- well the Maryland Zoo (then the Baltimore Zoo) actually did it!

The Children's Zoo here makes me sad. In my first book, I named it the nation's #1 best children's zoo and they put up a big banner announcing that status. Back then all of those innovative exhibits were filled with attractive animals. The pop-up exhibit had woodchucks, and there were also black bears, red foxes, skunks, and much more. We (at America's Best Zoos) still think this is a fun area for children, but it's not like it once was, back in the early 1990s. SnowLeopard is right -- it needs more animals.

One thing SnowLeopard rarely mentions is children's rides. This zoo has a wide variety of them, which makes the Children's Zoo all the more fun.

Polar Bear Watch is a great example of what I like best in zoos -- an exhibit that takes you to another place on earth. In this case, it's very easy to imagine that you are in Churchill, Manitoba.

They still have red foxes in Maryland Wilderness. I'm curious as to where the black bears were and what else they used to have. I didn't know they had black bears, and I thought they could easily add a predator/prey exhibit with them and white-tailed deer over by where the bridge and the fake tree with the slide and such.
 
@mweb08: thanks for all of your comments, and it is great to have a local zoo fan reporting back finely-tuned details. It is always intriguing for me to post long reviews of zoos that people are passionate about, as then I received lots of messages on this thread. Folks love their local zoos and will defend them to the death!:) I'll address some of your comments on Maryland Zoo and National Aquarium:

- I only saw 3 elephants, so the others must have been inside the barn

- the white rhino paddock is definitely part of the zebra/ostrich yard, and that is maybe the only mistake that I made in the extensive review in terms of animal enclosures. I really enjoyed that huge savanna area, but don't forget that I saw a similar and much better enclosure that is about 11 acres in size at Kansas City Zoo, another amazing and massive African Savanna with 10 different species and 18 acres in size at Binder Park Zoo, and there are many other zoos with multi-acre "African Savanna"-style yards. That is why Maryland's is good but not superb.

- I do probably agree with the book "America's Best Zoos" that the Maryland Wilderness area is a top 10 children's zoo, but with river otters and red foxes as the top two animal species then that area is seriously lacking a marquee species. There are other children's zoos with red pandas, servals, alligators, beavers, etc, or one look at Pittsburgh Zoo's huge area shows what can be done with space for kids. Maryland's kid's zone has many terrariums and fun activities, but with a scarcity of animals larger than my hand and 4 different empty exhibits it seemed that the entire area needed some sprucing up. Tiny Eastern box turtles in a pop-up tunnel area...seriously?

- Shedd Aquarium blows Baltimore out of the water! The massive dolphin/beluga/sea lion/sea otter complex there is probably twice as large and much better than the dolphin area at Baltimore, the Amazon Rising area at Shedd is better than at least 3 different levels combined at the Pier 3 Pavilion at Baltimore, and the diversity of species at Shedd is much superior than even Georgia as there are many more galleries and tanks. Also, Shedd has immersive areas such as Amazon Rising and their Wild Reef area, with all sorts of attachments coming out of the walls and ceilings. At Baltimore there are just tanks set into the wall with zero immersive elements. I adore Shedd, and all of the "Big 3" aquariums also have penguins which surprisingly Baltimore lacks. Other than dolphins there are no whales, seals, sea lions, sea otters, river otters or penguins at Baltimore. Don't get me wrong, I LOVED my Baltimore visit, but IMO it is not even close to Shedd, Georgia or Monterey Bay. It might end up #4 on my list, but being the 4th best aquarium that I've seen is still quite impressive. We'll see how much I enjoy my visits at Tennessee and Dallas World.
 
DAY 22: Monday, August 2nd

Today was a casual day, and one of the highlights of this road trip was checking into a motel at 2:00 in the afternoon and then all 3 of us having solid, two-hour naps. At home my wife and I quite frequently have a nap on the weekend, as looking after a little baby can be exhausting and draining. After driving almost 10,000 km and touring 17 zoos and 1 aquarium in the previous 21 days (an insane schedule for most people) we desperately needed to crash and relax and today was truly a great day for doing just that.

I didn’t have any internet connection for two consecutive nights, even though I specifically ask when I check in to each motel whether or not there is a solid Wi-Fi source. I’m always told that my laptop will work fine, and then we get back to the room and there is only one bar of power and I can’t send reviews to my mini “fan club” on this site. I still managed to spend a few hours this weekend typing up reviews, and so today once I had connectivity to the internet I posted extensive reviews of Roger Williams Park Zoo, Philadelphia Zoo, National Aquarium in Baltimore and Maryland Zoo. I hope that you all enjoyed them!

This is a day of reflection, and not counting the excellent aquarium I’ve been analyzing the 17 zoos that we’ve visited so far. Of all of those zoos only 2 of them would crack my North American top 20 list and those would of course be Sedgwick County and Saint Louis. An interesting fact is that those two zoos also have the brightest futures, as Sedgwick County has an amazing master plan and Saint Louis recently received a guarantee of $120 million to improve the zoo (including the bulldozing of the terrible bear pits). It seems as if those two zoos will continue to get even better, while others all around them are struggling for funding in tough economic times.

If Sedgwick County and Saint Louis have been the two highlights, then the two lowlights have been Buffalo and Milwaukee County. Buffalo has a terrific new rainforest building but most of the zoo is extremely poor, and Milwaukee appears to be stuck in the past and the zoo is 80% the exact same that it was in the 1970’s! Overall we saw many better zoos on our 30 zoo/aquarium 2008 road trip, as back then we toured San Diego, Bronx, Omaha, Columbus, Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Phoenix, Detroit, Oklahoma City, Minnesota, Brookfield and many others. We also knocked off Jacksonville, Disney’s Animal Kingdom and Zoo Miami on our mini-Florida road trip that same year, and so now that it is 2010 I feel that we’re seeing a number of “second tier” zoos. Not the cream of the crop, not the absolute worst either, but many zoos that are of average quality with hit-and-miss exhibits and adventures.

With the road trip now having lasted a full 3 weeks, we are at the halfway point in the schedule. The only changes to the original itinerary have been the additions of two smaller establishments (Mesker Park Zoo and Akron Zoo) and the omission of Nashville Zoo. It was a nice bonus to see two zoos that I had not planned to visit, and Nashville will be toured later this week.

Here is the schedule for the next four days:

Tuesday: North Carolina Zoo
Wednesday: Riverbanks Zoo
Thursday: Tennessee Aquarium (and maybe or maybe not Chattanooga Zoo, but to be honest it is not a high priority and we might skip it)
Friday: Nashville Zoo
 
I'm excited to hear about the Philadelphia Zoo as I will be going there hopefully in the fall. And although they may be lacking in exhibits, I'd go for the reason you stated, to see the variety of animals. I saw from pictures that the hippos don't have the best exhibit, but I'm always excited to see them in zoos. I've even seen photos from there where their keepers are massaging their throats with their hands deep in the hippo's mouth. Talk about trust! I'm not sure if I agree with you that the typical zoo visitor would rather see animals in naturalistic settings than horrible exhibits. What I mean is for the typical zoo goer, I think seeing the animal is the most important thing. And let me be clear, I view the typical zoo goer as those who call to the animals and mess up their names. For zoo enthusiasts then yes I agree, they'd rather see naturalistic exhibits, and it varies for all of us if that means a lot of viewing opportunities or hiding spots for the animals to have privacy. And it might be because I come from a zoo that doesn't have spectacular exhibits, but when seeing those annoying, crazy youth groups and their chaperones, all they care about is seeing the animal. One adult may make a comment like, "Oh I feel for sorry for them in there..." but they will only reflect on it for a second.

It was very interesting to hear about the Maryland Zoo's Polar Bear exhibit. I remember seeing a photo from America's Best Zoos and it looked really neat.

And on a side note, I'm glad you brought up Kylie walking about Cleveland PAC building looking like a monkey because I have an interesting story about my one year old niece. My niece has an interesting crawl where one of her legs are still bent and she just uses both hands and one leg to crawl around. It's hard to explain, but every time I see it, I swear she looks like a baby orangutan!
 
I just read your recent post about going to the North Carolina Zoo. I look forward to that review! I've seen photos of their male polar bear, Wally??, and he's absolutely adorable!
 
@snowleopard: I was working Sunday at the National Aquarium and hoped I would bump into you to give you a tour. But like any aquarium and zoo, it was swamped at 10. I'm glad you and your family enjoyed your visit!
 
I just read your recent post about going to the North Carolina Zoo. I look forward to that review! I've seen photos of their male polar bear, Wally??, and he's absolutely adorable!

Well, fi your talking about a bear from after 2008 and after, that would be "Aquila"

@Snowleopard - You guys are doing so well, and I love all your reviews and stories, hope you guys are all doing good!
 
@mweb08: thanks for all of your comments, and it is great to have a local zoo fan reporting back finely-tuned details. It is always intriguing for me to post long reviews of zoos that people are passionate about, as then I received lots of messages on this thread. Folks love their local zoos and will defend them to the death!:) I'll address some of your comments on Maryland Zoo and National Aquarium:

- I only saw 3 elephants, so the others must have been inside the barn

- the white rhino paddock is definitely part of the zebra/ostrich yard, and that is maybe the only mistake that I made in the extensive review in terms of animal enclosures. I really enjoyed that huge savanna area, but don't forget that I saw a similar and much better enclosure that is about 11 acres in size at Kansas City Zoo, another amazing and massive African Savanna with 10 different species and 18 acres in size at Binder Park Zoo, and there are many other zoos with multi-acre "African Savanna"-style yards. That is why Maryland's is good but not superb.

- I do probably agree with the book "America's Best Zoos" that the Maryland Wilderness area is a top 10 children's zoo, but with river otters and red foxes as the top two animal species then that area is seriously lacking a marquee species. There are other children's zoos with red pandas, servals, alligators, beavers, etc, or one look at Pittsburgh Zoo's huge area shows what can be done with space for kids. Maryland's kid's zone has many terrariums and fun activities, but with a scarcity of animals larger than my hand and 4 different empty exhibits it seemed that the entire area needed some sprucing up. Tiny Eastern box turtles in a pop-up tunnel area...seriously?

- Shedd Aquarium blows Baltimore out of the water! The massive dolphin/beluga/sea lion/sea otter complex there is probably twice as large and much better than the dolphin area at Baltimore, the Amazon Rising area at Shedd is better than at least 3 different levels combined at the Pier 3 Pavilion at Baltimore, and the diversity of species at Shedd is much superior than even Georgia as there are many more galleries and tanks. Also, Shedd has immersive areas such as Amazon Rising and their Wild Reef area, with all sorts of attachments coming out of the walls and ceilings. At Baltimore there are just tanks set into the wall with zero immersive elements. I adore Shedd, and all of the "Big 3" aquariums also have penguins which surprisingly Baltimore lacks. Other than dolphins there are no whales, seals, sea lions, sea otters, river otters or penguins at Baltimore. Don't get me wrong, I LOVED my Baltimore visit, but IMO it is not even close to Shedd, Georgia or Monterey Bay. It might end up #4 on my list, but being the 4th best aquarium that I've seen is still quite impressive. We'll see how much I enjoy my visits at Tennessee and Dallas World.

Yes, you saw bigger savanna exhibits no doubt. But I don't think the quality of the hoofstock exhibits were any better in KC than in Baltimore. But their overall Africa section is of course better.

Other than red panda's, I don't see any of those animals being better attractions than otters. Especially considering how good that exhibit is, which I'm surprised you didn't really mention. Plus red panda's usually aren't seen or aren't doing much in exhibits, and otters are usually more exciting, your visit not withstanding. Plus, it's called Maryland Wilderness, they are pretty limited in their species, but as I said, adding black bears and deers and a few more small animals would be great.

I totally disagree that Shedd blows Baltimore out of the water. Yes, they have the great exhibit where the belugas and dolphins and such are, and that is an advantage for them. I really don't think Amazon Rising is as great of an advantage as you suggest though. Otherwise, Baltimore has big advantages with their big tank in the middle of Pier 3, their reef and deep water exhibit where you wind down through it, the Australia exhibit which is amazing, and the rain forest exhibit which I normally see more than you did. Yes, Shedd has more of the big ticket species, but I don't think they have a more diverse species list in general, I don't think their exhibits are of better quality, and they lack the two immersive exhibits of Australia and the rain forest. Shedd is overrated in my opinion. If I hadn't seen some of their big ticket animals plenty of other times, maybe I'd like Shedd better, but I'm more spoiled than most in that regard. Seeing a beluga or penguins aren't go to be huge factors for me, although they do of course count in my ranking.

I saw a PBS Nature show on the Monterey Aquarium, and I'd likely rank that over both the aquariums we're talking about and I'd likely rank Atlanta over all of them.
 
... and I'd likely rank Atlanta over all of them.

It's really tough to argue against those amazing whale sharks! Plus, they have multiple hammerheads, multiple manta rays, belugas, sea otters, and so much more. Later this year, Georgia will add dolphins (including a show) and then it will be a slam dunk as to who is #1.
 
Back
Top